Mark Mielke ([email protected])

Number of posts: 202 (0.21 per day)
First post: 2002-03-06 20:09:01
Last post: 2004-10-17 18:12:36

Date List Subject
2002-11-20 07:47:20 linux-kernel Re: [rfc] epoll interface change and glibc bits ...
2002-11-20 07:34:34 linux-kernel Re: [rfc] epoll interface change and glibc bits ...
2002-11-19 20:44:29 linux-kernel Re: [rfc] epoll interface change and glibc bits ...
2002-11-19 06:07:49 linux-kernel Re: [rfc] epoll interface change and glibc bits ...
2002-11-19 05:55:26 linux-kernel Re: [rfc] epoll interface change and glibc bits ...
2002-11-19 03:50:16 linux-kernel Re: [rfc] epoll interface change and glibc bits ...
2002-11-19 03:39:33 linux-kernel Re: [rfc] epoll interface change and glibc bits ...
2002-11-18 22:19:31 linux-kernel Re: [rfc] epoll interface change and glibc bits ...
2002-11-18 17:37:15 linux-kernel Re: [rfc] epoll interface change and glibc bits ...
2002-11-12 16:14:13 linux-kernel Re: File Limit in Kernel?
2002-11-11 22:56:16 linux-kernel Re: PROT_SEM + FUTEX
2002-11-11 21:34:23 linux-kernel Re: PROT_SEM + FUTEX
2002-11-11 06:00:27 linux-kernel PROT_SEM + FUTEX
2002-11-02 04:47:52 linux-kernel Re: Unifying epoll,aio,futexes etc. (What I really want from epoll)
2002-11-01 20:14:10 linux-kernel Re: and nicer too - Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll
2002-11-01 04:21:24 linux-kernel Re: Unifying epoll,aio,futexes etc. (What I really want from epoll)
2002-10-31 17:04:12 linux-kernel Re: CONFIG_TINY
2002-10-31 16:43:14 linux-kernel Re: CONFIG_TINY
2002-10-31 05:26:34 linux-kernel Re: CONFIG_TINY
2002-10-23 07:18:00 linux-kernel Re: Bitkeeper outrage, old and new
2002-10-22 19:19:08 linux-kernel Re: Bitkeeper outrage, old and new
2002-10-22 17:18:17 linux-kernel Re: Use of yield() in the kernel
2002-10-22 17:16:39 linux-kernel Re: epoll (was Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5)
2002-10-20 08:34:17 linux-kernel Re: Bitkeeper outrage, old and new
2002-10-20 08:32:02 linux-kernel Re: Bitkeeper outrage, old and new
2002-10-20 08:30:41 linux-kernel Re: Bitkeeper outrage, old and new
2002-10-20 08:26:46 linux-kernel Re: Bitkeeper outrage, old and new
2002-10-19 06:53:09 linux-kernel Re: epoll (was Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5)
2002-10-19 06:50:21 linux-kernel Re: epoll (was Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5)
2002-10-18 18:57:18 linux-kernel Re: epoll (was Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5)
2002-10-18 18:51:55 linux-kernel Re: epoll (was Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5)
2002-10-18 17:39:43 linux-kernel Re: epoll (was Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5)
2002-10-16 21:41:07 linux-kernel Re: Kernel reports 4 CPUS instead of 2...
2002-10-16 20:02:16 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5
2002-10-11 01:59:13 linux-kernel Re: More on O_STREAMING (goodby read pauses)
2002-10-10 17:55:59 linux-kernel Re: More on O_STREAMING (goodby read pauses)
2002-10-10 17:44:56 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] O_STREAMING - flag for optimal streaming I/O
2002-10-10 04:51:04 linux-kernel Re: BK is *evil* corporate software [was Re: New BK License Problem?]
2002-10-10 03:44:24 linux-kernel Re: BK is *evil* corporate software [was Re: New BK License Problem?]
2002-10-10 03:36:23 linux-kernel Re: More on O_STREAMING (goodby read pauses)
2002-10-10 03:02:03 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] O_STREAMING - flag for optimal streaming I/O
2002-10-09 22:19:09 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] O_STREAMING - flag for optimal streaming I/O
2002-10-09 17:00:21 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] O_STREAMING - flag for optimal streaming I/O
2002-10-08 01:00:55 linux-kernel Re: New BK License Problem?
2002-10-07 16:49:21 linux-kernel Re: The end of embedded Linux?
2002-10-06 19:17:17 linux-kernel Re: New BK License Problem?
2002-10-05 20:54:40 linux-kernel Re: The end of embedded Linux?
2002-09-25 21:14:21 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH][2.5] Single linked lists for Linux
2002-09-25 18:54:56 linux-kernel Re: Offtopic: (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native POSIX Thread Library 0.1)
2002-09-24 04:31:45 linux-kernel Re: Nanosecond resolution for stat(2)
2002-09-24 03:34:34 linux-kernel Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native POSIX Thread Library 0.1