Olivier Galibert ([email protected])

Number of posts: 345 (0.14 per day)
First post: 1998-08-07 22:43:57
Last post: 2005-03-22 00:02:19

Date List Subject
2006-03-21 12:48:01 linux-kernel Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.16
2006-03-21 00:13:43 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 04/23] driver core: platform_get_irq*(): return -ENXIO on error
2006-03-20 23:58:56 linux-kernel Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.16
2006-03-14 23:47:16 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Fix SCO on Broadcom Bluetooth adapters
2006-03-14 23:47:15 bluez-devel Re: [PATCH] Fix SCO on Broadcom Bluetooth adapters
2006-03-14 14:08:37 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Fix SCO on Broadcom Bluetooth adapters
2006-03-14 11:12:57 linux-kernel [PATCH] Fix SCO on Broadcom Bluetooth adapters
2006-03-09 16:49:22 linux-kernel Re: [future of drivers?] a proposal for binary drivers.
2006-03-06 16:15:14 linux-kernel Re: Is that an acceptable interface change?
2006-03-06 15:50:30 linux-kernel Re: Is that an acceptable interface change?
2006-03-06 01:18:07 linux-kernel Is that an acceptable interface change?
2006-03-02 14:53:20 linux-kernel Re: My desperation: Oops during mkfs.ext3 on large partitions
2006-03-01 23:25:37 linux-kernel Re: MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE
2006-03-01 22:34:31 linux-kernel Re: MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE
2006-02-27 22:58:29 linux-kernel Re: [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation
2006-02-27 22:56:58 linux-kernel Re: [RFC] Add kernel<->userspace ABI stability documentation
2006-02-20 18:44:36 linux-kernel Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler?
2006-02-20 18:31:45 linux-kernel Re: suspend2 review [was Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)]
2006-02-20 18:17:05 linux-kernel Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-20 17:36:11 linux-kernel Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-20 17:05:39 linux-kernel Re: suspend2 review [was Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)]
2006-02-20 16:52:05 linux-kernel Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler?
2006-02-20 15:39:25 linux-kernel Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-20 12:31:28 linux-kernel Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
2006-02-20 01:26:21 linux-kernel Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler?
2006-02-20 00:56:19 linux-kernel Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler?
2006-02-16 17:45:59 linux-kernel Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
2006-02-15 16:55:58 linux-kernel Re: Device enumeration (was Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest))
2006-02-15 16:40:17 linux-kernel Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
2006-02-15 15:01:48 linux-kernel Re: Device enumeration (was Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest))
2006-02-15 14:54:23 linux-kernel Re: Device enumeration (was Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest))
2006-02-14 23:32:56 linux-kernel Re: Device enumeration (was Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest))
2006-02-14 23:24:10 linux-kernel Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
2006-02-14 23:17:36 linux-kernel Re: Device enumeration (was Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest))
2006-02-14 23:00:32 linux-kernel Re: Device enumeration (was Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest))
2006-02-14 19:14:08 linux-kernel Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler?
2006-02-14 19:06:10 linux-kernel Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
2006-02-14 18:59:32 linux-kernel Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
2006-02-14 18:41:44 linux-kernel Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
2006-02-14 10:40:07 linux-kernel Re: Device enumeration (was Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest))
2006-02-13 19:53:24 linux-kernel Device enumeration (was Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest))
2006-02-13 16:49:19 linux-kernel Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
2006-02-13 14:10:14 linux-kernel Re: max symlink = 5? ?bug? ?feature deficit?
2006-02-12 21:14:16 linux-kernel Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
2006-02-12 12:04:56 linux-kernel Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
2006-02-04 01:08:41 linux-kernel Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
2006-02-04 00:37:02 linux-kernel Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
2006-02-04 00:26:37 linux-kernel Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
2006-02-04 00:02:08 linux-kernel Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
2006-02-03 20:47:21 linux-kernel Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
2006-02-03 18:45:55 linux-kernel Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)