Richard M. Stallman ([email protected])

Number of posts: 78 (0.06 per day)
First post: 2002-07-21 20:11:48
Last post: 2005-12-12 00:45:00

Next Page
Date List Subject
2005-12-12 00:45:00 linux-kernel Re: GNU/Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
2005-12-12 00:33:09 linux-kernel Re: GNU/Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
2005-12-10 05:17:39 linux-kernel Re: GNU/Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
2005-12-10 05:16:50 linux-kernel Re: GNU/Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
2003-07-18 19:36:44 linux-kernel Bitkeeper
2003-01-23 11:28:36 linux-kernel Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him
2003-01-22 09:50:30 linux-kernel Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him
2003-01-21 18:08:44 linux-kernel Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him
2003-01-20 00:41:38 linux-kernel Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him
2003-01-20 00:41:34 linux-kernel Re: [OFFTOPIC] Is the repository of a GPL'd program itself under the GPL?
2003-01-19 01:27:49 linux-kernel Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him
2003-01-18 00:38:15 linux-kernel Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him
2003-01-18 00:38:05 linux-kernel Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him
2003-01-15 23:19:53 linux-kernel Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him
2003-01-15 23:19:42 linux-kernel Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him
2003-01-14 18:46:15 linux-kernel Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
2003-01-14 18:46:02 linux-kernel Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
2003-01-14 05:38:49 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
2003-01-14 05:38:48 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
2003-01-12 11:47:53 linux-kernel Re: OT Naming. was: Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
2003-01-12 11:47:32 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in proprietary drivers?
2003-01-12 11:46:33 linux-kernel Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
2003-01-12 11:46:23 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
2003-01-11 00:14:19 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
2003-01-11 00:12:40 linux-kernel Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
2003-01-11 00:12:40 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
2003-01-10 09:44:18 linux-kernel Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
2003-01-09 23:07:18 linux-kernel Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
2003-01-09 23:07:17 linux-kernel Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
2003-01-09 23:06:25 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
2003-01-09 23:05:02 linux-kernel Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
2003-01-09 23:04:27 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
2003-01-09 07:20:07 linux-kernel Re: Gauntlet Set NOW!
2003-01-09 07:19:19 linux-kernel Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
2003-01-08 07:52:53 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
2003-01-08 07:52:52 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
2003-01-08 07:52:47 linux-kernel Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
2003-01-07 18:35:29 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-freedrivers?
2003-01-07 13:31:54 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
2003-01-07 13:31:50 linux-kernel Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
2003-01-07 13:31:13 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
2003-01-06 20:41:30 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-freedrivers?
2003-01-06 20:41:16 linux-kernel Re: Linux iSCSI Initiator, OpenSource (fwd) (Re: Gauntlet Set NOW!)
2003-01-06 17:04:53 linux-kernel Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
2003-01-06 17:04:26 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
2003-01-06 03:19:46 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
2003-01-06 03:17:40 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-freedrivers?
2003-01-06 03:17:36 linux-kernel Re: Linux iSCSI Initiator, OpenSource (fwd) (Re: Gauntlet Set NOW!)
2003-01-06 03:16:32 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers?
2003-01-06 03:16:31 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers?
2003-01-05 18:25:26 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?