This patch looks like it should be in the 3.9-stable tree, should we apply
it?
------------------
From: "Micha? Miros?aw <[email protected]>"
commit c80712c793febdf1b13ad0e1c71a051e071b3fd8 upstream
This fixes 'preenable failed: -EINVAL' error when using this driver.
Signed-off-by: Micha? Miros?aw <[email protected]>"
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <[email protected]>
---
drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
index 55a459b..f5e9e55 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
@@ -693,7 +693,6 @@ static void mxs_lradc_trigger_remove(struct iio_dev
*iio)
static int mxs_lradc_buffer_preenable(struct iio_dev *iio)
{
struct mxs_lradc *lradc = iio_priv(iio);
- struct iio_buffer *buffer = iio->buffer;
int ret = 0, chan, ofs = 0;
unsigned long enable = 0;
uint32_t ctrl4_set = 0;
@@ -701,7 +700,7 @@ static int mxs_lradc_buffer_preenable(struct iio_dev
*iio)
uint32_t ctrl1_irq = 0;
const uint32_t chan_value = LRADC_CH_ACCUMULATE |
((LRADC_DELAY_TIMER_LOOP - 1) <<
LRADC_CH_NUM_SAMPLES_OFFSET);
- const int len = bitmap_weight(buffer->scan_mask,
LRADC_MAX_TOTAL_CHANS);
+ const int len = bitmap_weight(iio->active_scan_mask,
LRADC_MAX_TOTAL_CHANS);
if (!len)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -728,7 +727,7 @@ static int mxs_lradc_buffer_preenable(struct iio_dev
*iio)
lradc->base + LRADC_CTRL1 + STMP_OFFSET_REG_CLR);
writel(0xff, lradc->base + LRADC_CTRL0 + STMP_OFFSET_REG_CLR);
- for_each_set_bit(chan, buffer->scan_mask, LRADC_MAX_TOTAL_CHANS) {
+ for_each_set_bit(chan, iio->active_scan_mask, LRADC_MAX_TOTAL_CHANS)
{
ctrl4_set |= chan << LRADC_CTRL4_LRADCSELECT_OFFSET(ofs);
ctrl4_clr |= LRADC_CTRL4_LRADCSELECT_MASK(ofs);
ctrl1_irq |= LRADC_CTRL1_LRADC_IRQ_EN(ofs);
--
1.7.9.5