This patch deals with checkpatch complaint as fixing line length
exceeding 80 characters.
WARNING: line over 80 characters
Signed-off-by: Jungseok Lee <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Sungjinn Chung <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
index 80bb1e6..e0d4f24 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -563,8 +563,8 @@ void kvm_free_stage2_pgd(struct kvm *kvm)
kvm->arch.pgd = NULL;
}
-static pmd_t *stage2_get_pmd(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
- phys_addr_t addr)
+static pmd_t *stage2_get_pmd(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache
+ *cache, phys_addr_t addr)
{
pgd_t *pgd;
pud_t *pud;
--
1.7.10.4
On 14/04/14 08:40, Jungseok Lee wrote:
> This patch deals with checkpatch complaint as fixing line length
> exceeding 80 characters.
>
> WARNING: line over 80 characters
>
> Signed-off-by: Jungseok Lee <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Sungjinn Chung <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
> index 80bb1e6..e0d4f24 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -563,8 +563,8 @@ void kvm_free_stage2_pgd(struct kvm *kvm)
> kvm->arch.pgd = NULL;
> }
>
> -static pmd_t *stage2_get_pmd(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
> - phys_addr_t addr)
> +static pmd_t *stage2_get_pmd(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache
> + *cache, phys_addr_t addr)
Please don't. This makes the code unreadable (and no, I don't care about
checkpatch ;-).
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
On Tuesday, April 15, 2014 1:19 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 14/04/14 08:40, Jungseok Lee wrote:
> > This patch deals with checkpatch complaint as fixing line length
> > exceeding 80 characters.
> >
> > WARNING: line over 80 characters
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jungseok Lee <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Sungjinn Chung <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c index
> > 80bb1e6..e0d4f24 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
> > @@ -563,8 +563,8 @@ void kvm_free_stage2_pgd(struct kvm *kvm)
> > kvm->arch.pgd = NULL;
> > }
> >
> > -static pmd_t *stage2_get_pmd(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
> > - phys_addr_t addr)
> > +static pmd_t *stage2_get_pmd(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache
> > + *cache, phys_addr_t addr)
>
> Please don't. This makes the code unreadable (and no, I don't care about checkpatch ;-).
Okay. I will drop this patch from the next version.
It would be good to change stage2_set_pmd_huge function for readability
if you don't care about checkpatch.
Best Regards
Jungseok Lee
On 15/04/14 01:38, Jungseok Lee wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 15, 2014 1:19 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 14/04/14 08:40, Jungseok Lee wrote:
>>> This patch deals with checkpatch complaint as fixing line length
>>> exceeding 80 characters.
>>>
>>> WARNING: line over 80 characters
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jungseok Lee <[email protected]>
>>> Reviewed-by: Sungjinn Chung <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c index
>>> 80bb1e6..e0d4f24 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
>>> @@ -563,8 +563,8 @@ void kvm_free_stage2_pgd(struct kvm *kvm)
>>> kvm->arch.pgd = NULL;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static pmd_t *stage2_get_pmd(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
>>> - phys_addr_t addr)
>>> +static pmd_t *stage2_get_pmd(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache
>>> + *cache, phys_addr_t addr)
>>
>> Please don't. This makes the code unreadable (and no, I don't care about checkpatch ;-).
>
> Okay. I will drop this patch from the next version.
>
> It would be good to change stage2_set_pmd_huge function for readability
> if you don't care about checkpatch.
We usually don't change that kind of thing just for the sake of changing
it. It feels like fairly pointless churn. *IF* someone happens to rework
that code, then they're welcome to fix it.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...