Hi,

I tested this patch on an existing laptop which uses SPI with a GPIO
Chipselect,
(HP EliteBook 860 G9), and I get the error:

[ 2.671655] pxa2xx-spi pxa2xx-spi.2: chipselect 1 already in use
[ 2.671711] spi_master spi0: error -EBUSY: failed to add SPI device
CSC3551:00 from ACPI
[ 2.690903] Serial bus multi instantiate pseudo device driver:
probe of CSC3551:00 failed with error -16

Please don't merge this until we have fully investigated.

Thanks,
Stefan Binding

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <[email protected]>
> Sent: 10 March 2023 17:32
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; chin-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; bcm-
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-arm-
> [email protected]; [email protected];
linux-
> [email protected]; [email protected];
linux-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]; linux-stm32@st-md-
> mailman.stormreply.com; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: [PATCH V6 09/15] spi: Add stacked and parallel memories
> support in SPI core
>
> For supporting multiple CS the SPI device need to be aware of all
the
> CS
> values. So, the "chip_select" member in the spi_device structure is
> now an
> array that holds all the CS values.
>
> spi_device structure now has a "cs_index_mask" member. This acts as
> an
> index to the chip_select array. If nth bit of spi->cs_index_mask is
set
> then the driver would assert spi->chip_select[n].
>
> In parallel mode all the chip selects are asserted/de-asserted
> simultaneously and each byte of data is stored in both devices, the
> even
> bits in one, the odd bits in the other. The split is automatically
handled
> by the GQSPI controller. The GQSPI controller supports a maximum of
> two
> flashes connected in parallel mode. A "multi-cs-cap" flag is added
in
> the
> spi controntroller data, through ctlr->multi-cs-cap the spi core
will
> make
> sure that the controller is capable of handling multiple chip
selects at
> once.
>
> For supporting multiple CS via GPIO the cs_gpiod member of the
> spi_device
> structure is now an array that holds the gpio descriptor for each
> chipselect.
>
> Multi CS support using GPIO is not tested due to unavailability of
> necessary hardware setup.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-
> [email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi.c | 225
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> -
> include/linux/spi/spi.h | 34 ++++--
> 2 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
> index c725b4bab7af..742bd688381c 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
> @@ -612,10 +612,17 @@ static int spi_dev_check(struct device *dev,
> void *data)
> {
> struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
> struct spi_device *new_spi = data;
> -
> - if (spi->controller == new_spi->controller &&
> - spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0) == spi_get_chipselect(new_spi,
0))
> - return -EBUSY;
> + int idx, nw_idx;
> +
> + if (spi->controller == new_spi->controller) {
> + for (idx = 0; idx < SPI_CS_CNT_MAX; idx++) {
> + for (nw_idx = 0; nw_idx < SPI_CS_CNT_MAX;
> nw_idx++) {
> + if (spi_get_chipselect(spi, idx) ==
> + spi_get_chipselect(new_spi,
> nw_idx))
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -629,7 +636,7 @@ static int __spi_add_device(struct spi_device
> *spi)
> {
> struct spi_controller *ctlr = spi->controller;
> struct device *dev = ctlr->dev.parent;
> - int status;
> + int status, idx;
>
> /*
> * We need to make sure there's no other device with this
> @@ -638,8 +645,7 @@ static int __spi_add_device(struct spi_device
> *spi)
> */
> status = bus_for_each_dev(&spi_bus_type, NULL, spi,
> spi_dev_check);
> if (status) {
> - dev_err(dev, "chipselect %d already in use\n",
> - spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0));
> + dev_err(dev, "chipselect %d already in use\n",
> spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0));
> return status;
> }
>
> @@ -649,8 +655,10 @@ static int __spi_add_device(struct spi_device
> *spi)
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> - if (ctlr->cs_gpiods)
> - spi_set_csgpiod(spi, 0, ctlr-
> >cs_gpiods[spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0)]);
> + if (ctlr->cs_gpiods) {
> + for (idx = 0; idx < SPI_CS_CNT_MAX; idx++)
> + spi_set_csgpiod(spi, idx, ctlr-
> >cs_gpiods[spi_get_chipselect(spi, idx)]);
> + }
>
> /*
> * Drivers may modify this initial i/o setup, but will
> @@ -690,13 +698,15 @@ int spi_add_device(struct spi_device *spi)
> {
> struct spi_controller *ctlr = spi->controller;
> struct device *dev = ctlr->dev.parent;
> - int status;
> + int status, idx;
>
> - /* Chipselects are numbered 0..max; validate. */
> - if (spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0) >= ctlr->num_chipselect) {
> - dev_err(dev, "cs%d >= max %d\n",
> spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0),
> - ctlr->num_chipselect);
> - return -EINVAL;
> + for (idx = 0; idx < SPI_CS_CNT_MAX; idx++) {
> + /* Chipselects are numbered 0..max; validate. */
> + if (spi_get_chipselect(spi, idx) >= ctlr-
> >num_chipselect) {
> + dev_err(dev, "cs%d >= max %d\n",
> spi_get_chipselect(spi, idx),
> + ctlr->num_chipselect);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> }
>
> /* Set the bus ID string */
> @@ -713,12 +723,15 @@ static int spi_add_device_locked(struct
> spi_device *spi)
> {
> struct spi_controller *ctlr = spi->controller;
> struct device *dev = ctlr->dev.parent;
> + int idx;
>
> - /* Chipselects are numbered 0..max; validate. */
> - if (spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0) >= ctlr->num_chipselect) {
> - dev_err(dev, "cs%d >= max %d\n",
> spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0),
> - ctlr->num_chipselect);
> - return -EINVAL;
> + for (idx = 0; idx < SPI_CS_CNT_MAX; idx++) {
> + /* Chipselects are numbered 0..max; validate. */
> + if (spi_get_chipselect(spi, idx) >= ctlr-
> >num_chipselect) {
> + dev_err(dev, "cs%d >= max %d\n",
> spi_get_chipselect(spi, idx),
> + ctlr->num_chipselect);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> }
>
> /* Set the bus ID string */
> @@ -966,58 +979,119 @@ static void spi_res_release(struct
> spi_controller *ctlr, struct spi_message *mes
> static void spi_set_cs(struct spi_device *spi, bool enable, bool
force)
> {
> bool activate = enable;
> + u32 cs_num = __ffs(spi->cs_index_mask);
> + int idx;
>
> /*
> - * Avoid calling into the driver (or doing delays) if the chip
> select
> - * isn't actually changing from the last time this was called.
> + * In parallel mode all the chip selects are
asserted/de-asserted
> + * at once
> */
> - if (!force && ((enable && spi->controller->last_cs ==
> spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0)) ||
> - (!enable && spi->controller->last_cs !=
> spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0))) &&
> - (spi->controller->last_cs_mode_high == (spi->mode &
> SPI_CS_HIGH)))
> - return;
> -
> - trace_spi_set_cs(spi, activate);
> -
> - spi->controller->last_cs = enable ? spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0)
: -
> 1;
> - spi->controller->last_cs_mode_high = spi->mode &
> SPI_CS_HIGH;
> -
> - if ((spi_get_csgpiod(spi, 0) ||
!spi->controller->set_cs_timing)
> && !activate)
> - spi_delay_exec(&spi->cs_hold, NULL);
> -
> - if (spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH)
> - enable = !enable;
> + if ((spi->cs_index_mask & SPI_PARALLEL_CS_MASK) ==
> SPI_PARALLEL_CS_MASK) {
> + spi->controller->last_cs_mode_high = spi->mode &
> SPI_CS_HIGH;
> +
> + if ((spi_get_csgpiod(spi, 0) || !spi->controller-
> >set_cs_timing) && !activate)
> + spi_delay_exec(&spi->cs_hold, NULL);
> +
> + if (spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH)
> + enable = !enable;
> +
> + if (spi_get_csgpiod(spi, 0) && spi_get_csgpiod(spi,
1)) {
> + if (!(spi->mode & SPI_NO_CS)) {
> + /*
> + * Historically ACPI has no means of
the
> GPIO polarity and
> + * thus the SPISerialBus() resource
> defines it on the per-chip
> + * basis. In order to avoid a chain of
> negations, the GPIO
> + * polarity is considered being Active
> High. Even for the cases
> + * when _DSD() is involved (in the
> updated versions of ACPI)
> + * the GPIO CS polarity must be
> defined Active High to avoid
> + * ambiguity. That's why we use
> enable, that takes SPI_CS_HIGH
> + * into account.
> + */
> + if (has_acpi_companion(&spi->dev)) {
> + for (idx = 0; idx <
> SPI_CS_CNT_MAX; idx++)
> +
> gpiod_set_value_cansleep(spi_get_csgpiod(spi, idx),
> +
> !enable);
> + } else {
> + for (idx = 0; idx <
> SPI_CS_CNT_MAX; idx++)
> + /* Polarity handled by
> GPIO library */
> +
> gpiod_set_value_cansleep(spi_get_csgpiod(spi, idx),
> +
> activate);
> + }
> + }
> + /* Some SPI masters need both GPIO CS &
> slave_select */
> + if ((spi->controller->flags &
> SPI_MASTER_GPIO_SS) &&
> + spi->controller->set_cs)
> + spi->controller->set_cs(spi, !enable);
> + else if (spi->controller->set_cs)
> + spi->controller->set_cs(spi, !enable);
> + }
>
> - if (spi_get_csgpiod(spi, 0)) {
> - if (!(spi->mode & SPI_NO_CS)) {
> - /*
> - * Historically ACPI has no means of the GPIO
> polarity and
> - * thus the SPISerialBus() resource defines it
on
> the per-chip
> - * basis. In order to avoid a chain of
negations,
> the GPIO
> - * polarity is considered being Active High.
Even
> for the cases
> - * when _DSD() is involved (in the updated
> versions of ACPI)
> - * the GPIO CS polarity must be defined Active
> High to avoid
> - * ambiguity. That's why we use enable, that
> takes SPI_CS_HIGH
> - * into account.
> - */
> - if (has_acpi_companion(&spi->dev))
> -
> gpiod_set_value_cansleep(spi_get_csgpiod(spi, 0), !enable);
> - else
> - /* Polarity handled by GPIO library */
> -
> gpiod_set_value_cansleep(spi_get_csgpiod(spi, 0), activate);
> + for (idx = 0; idx < SPI_CS_CNT_MAX; idx++) {
> + if (spi_get_csgpiod(spi, idx) ||
!spi->controller-
> >set_cs_timing) {
> + if (activate)
> + spi_delay_exec(&spi-
> >cs_setup, NULL);
> + else
> + spi_delay_exec(&spi-
> >cs_inactive, NULL);
> + }
> }
> - /* Some SPI masters need both GPIO CS &
> slave_select */
> - if ((spi->controller->flags & SPI_MASTER_GPIO_SS) &&
> - spi->controller->set_cs)
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * Avoid calling into the driver (or doing delays) if
the
> chip select
> + * isn't actually changing from the last time this was
> called.
> + */
> + if (!force && ((enable && spi->controller->last_cs ==
> + spi_get_chipselect(spi, cs_num)) ||
> + (!enable && spi->controller->last_cs
!=
> + spi_get_chipselect(spi, cs_num))) &&
> + (spi->controller->last_cs_mode_high ==
> + (spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH)))
> + return;
> +
> + trace_spi_set_cs(spi, activate);
> +
> + spi->controller->last_cs = enable ?
> spi_get_chipselect(spi, cs_num) : -1;
> + spi->controller->last_cs_mode_high = spi->mode &
> SPI_CS_HIGH;
> +
> + if ((spi_get_csgpiod(spi, cs_num) || !spi->controller-
> >set_cs_timing) && !activate)
> + spi_delay_exec(&spi->cs_hold, NULL);
> +
> + if (spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH)
> + enable = !enable;
> +
> + if (spi_get_csgpiod(spi, cs_num)) {
> + if (!(spi->mode & SPI_NO_CS)) {
> + /*
> + * Historically ACPI has no means of
the
> GPIO polarity and
> + * thus the SPISerialBus() resource
> defines it on the per-chip
> + * basis. In order to avoid a chain of
> negations, the GPIO
> + * polarity is considered being Active
> High. Even for the cases
> + * when _DSD() is involved (in the
> updated versions of ACPI)
> + * the GPIO CS polarity must be
> defined Active High to avoid
> + * ambiguity. That's why we use
> enable, that takes SPI_CS_HIGH
> + * into account.
> + */
> + if (has_acpi_companion(&spi->dev))
> +
> gpiod_set_value_cansleep(spi_get_csgpiod(spi, cs_num),
> +
> !enable);
> + else
> + /* Polarity handled by GPIO
> library */
> +
> gpiod_set_value_cansleep(spi_get_csgpiod(spi, cs_num),
> +
> activate);
> + }
> + /* Some SPI masters need both GPIO CS &
> slave_select */
> + if ((spi->controller->flags &
> SPI_MASTER_GPIO_SS) &&
> + spi->controller->set_cs)
> + spi->controller->set_cs(spi, !enable);
> + } else if (spi->controller->set_cs) {
> spi->controller->set_cs(spi, !enable);
> - } else if (spi->controller->set_cs) {
> - spi->controller->set_cs(spi, !enable);
> - }
> + }
>
> - if (spi_get_csgpiod(spi, 0) ||
!spi->controller->set_cs_timing) {
> - if (activate)
> - spi_delay_exec(&spi->cs_setup, NULL);
> - else
> - spi_delay_exec(&spi->cs_inactive, NULL);
> + if (spi_get_csgpiod(spi, cs_num) || !spi->controller-
> >set_cs_timing) {
> + if (activate)
> + spi_delay_exec(&spi->cs_setup,
> NULL);
> + else
> + spi_delay_exec(&spi->cs_inactive,
> NULL);
> + }
> }
> }
>
> @@ -2246,8 +2320,8 @@ static void of_spi_parse_dt_cs_delay(struct
> device_node *nc,
> static int of_spi_parse_dt(struct spi_controller *ctlr, struct
spi_device
> *spi,
> struct device_node *nc)
> {
> - u32 value;
> - int rc;
> + u32 value, cs[SPI_CS_CNT_MAX] = {0};
> + int rc, idx;
>
> /* Mode (clock phase/polarity/etc.) */
> if (of_property_read_bool(nc, "spi-cpha"))
> @@ -2320,13 +2394,21 @@ static int of_spi_parse_dt(struct
> spi_controller *ctlr, struct spi_device *spi,
> }
>
> /* Device address */
> - rc = of_property_read_u32(nc, "reg", &value);
> - if (rc) {
> + rc = of_property_read_variable_u32_array(nc, "reg", &cs[0], 1,
> + SPI_CS_CNT_MAX);
> + if (rc < 0 || rc > ctlr->num_chipselect) {
> dev_err(&ctlr->dev, "%pOF has no valid 'reg' property
> (%d)\n",
> nc, rc);
> return rc;
> + } else if ((of_property_read_bool(nc, "parallel-memories"))
> &&
> + (!ctlr->multi_cs_cap)) {
> + dev_err(&ctlr->dev, "SPI controller doesn't support
> multi CS\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
> - spi_set_chipselect(spi, 0, value);
> + for (idx = 0; idx < rc; idx++)
> + spi_set_chipselect(spi, idx, cs[idx]);
> + /* By default set the spi->cs_index_mask as 1 */
> + spi->cs_index_mask = 0x01;
>
> /* Device speed */
> if (!of_property_read_u32(nc, "spi-max-frequency", &value))
> @@ -3846,6 +3928,7 @@ static int __spi_validate(struct spi_device
> *spi, struct spi_message *message)
> struct spi_controller *ctlr = spi->controller;
> struct spi_transfer *xfer;
> int w_size;
> + u32 cs_num = __ffs(spi->cs_index_mask);
>
> if (list_empty(&message->transfers))
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -3858,7 +3941,7 @@ static int __spi_validate(struct spi_device
> *spi, struct spi_message *message)
> * cs_change is set for each transfer.
> */
> if ((spi->mode & SPI_CS_WORD) && (!(ctlr->mode_bits &
> SPI_CS_WORD) ||
> - spi_get_csgpiod(spi, 0))) {
> + spi_get_csgpiod(spi,
> cs_num))) {
> size_t maxsize;
> int ret;
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/spi/spi.h b/include/linux/spi/spi.h
> index bdb35a91b4bf..452682aa1a39 100644
> --- a/include/linux/spi/spi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/spi/spi.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,11 @@
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/u64_stats_sync.h>
>
> +/* Max no. of CS supported per spi device */
> +#define SPI_CS_CNT_MAX 2
> +
> +/* chip select mask */
> +#define SPI_PARALLEL_CS_MASK (BIT(0) | BIT(1))
> struct dma_chan;
> struct software_node;
> struct ptp_system_timestamp;
> @@ -166,6 +171,7 @@ extern void
> spi_transfer_cs_change_delay_exec(struct spi_message *msg,
> * deasserted. If @cs_change_delay is used from @spi_transfer,
> then the
> * two delays will be added up.
> * @pcpu_statistics: statistics for the spi_device
> + * @cs_index_mask: Bit mask of the active chipselect(s) in the
> chipselect array
> *
> * A @spi_device is used to interchange data between an SPI slave
> * (usually a discrete chip) and CPU memory.
> @@ -181,7 +187,7 @@ struct spi_device {
> struct spi_controller *controller;
> struct spi_controller *master; /* Compatibility layer
> */
> u32 max_speed_hz;
> - u8 chip_select;
> + u8 chip_select[SPI_CS_CNT_MAX];
> u8 bits_per_word;
> bool rt;
> #define SPI_NO_TX BIT(31) /* No transmit wire */
> @@ -202,7 +208,7 @@ struct spi_device {
> void *controller_data;
> char modalias[SPI_NAME_SIZE];
> const char *driver_override;
> - struct gpio_desc *cs_gpiod; /* Chip select gpio
desc
> */
> + struct gpio_desc *cs_gpiod[SPI_CS_CNT_MAX]; /*
Chip
> select gpio desc */
> struct spi_delay word_delay; /* Inter-word delay */
> /* CS delays */
> struct spi_delay cs_setup;
> @@ -212,6 +218,13 @@ struct spi_device {
> /* The statistics */
> struct spi_statistics __percpu *pcpu_statistics;
>
> + /* Bit mask of the chipselect(s) that the driver need to use
> from
> + * the chipselect array.When the controller is capable to
handle
> + * multiple chip selects & memories are connected in parallel
> + * then more than one bit need to be set in cs_index_mask.
> + */
> + u32 cs_index_mask : 2;
> +
> /*
> * likely need more hooks for more protocol options affecting
> how
> * the controller talks to each chip, like:
> @@ -268,22 +281,22 @@ static inline void *spi_get_drvdata(struct
> spi_device *spi)
>
> static inline u8 spi_get_chipselect(struct spi_device *spi, u8 idx)
> {
> - return spi->chip_select;
> + return spi->chip_select[idx];
> }
>
> static inline void spi_set_chipselect(struct spi_device *spi, u8
idx, u8
> chipselect)
> {
> - spi->chip_select = chipselect;
> + spi->chip_select[idx] = chipselect;
> }
>
> static inline struct gpio_desc *spi_get_csgpiod(struct spi_device
*spi,
> u8 idx)
> {
> - return spi->cs_gpiod;
> + return spi->cs_gpiod[idx];
> }
>
> static inline void spi_set_csgpiod(struct spi_device *spi, u8 idx,
struct
> gpio_desc *csgpiod)
> {
> - spi->cs_gpiod = csgpiod;
> + spi->cs_gpiod[idx] = csgpiod;
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -388,6 +401,8 @@ extern struct spi_device
> *spi_new_ancillary_device(struct spi_device *spi, u8 ch
> * @bus_lock_spinlock: spinlock for SPI bus locking
> * @bus_lock_mutex: mutex for exclusion of multiple callers
> * @bus_lock_flag: indicates that the SPI bus is locked for
exclusive
> use
> + * @multi_cs_cap: indicates that the SPI Controller can assert/de-
> assert
> + * more than one chip select at once.
> * @setup: updates the device mode and clocking records used by a
> * device's SPI controller; protocol code may call this. This
> * must fail if an unrecognized or unsupported mode is
> requested.
> @@ -585,6 +600,13 @@ struct spi_controller {
> /* Flag indicating that the SPI bus is locked for exclusive
use */
> bool bus_lock_flag;
>
> + /*
> + * Flag indicating that the spi-controller has multi chip
select
> + * capability and can assert/de-assert more than one chip
> select
> + * at once.
> + */
> + bool multi_cs_cap;
> +
> /* Setup mode and clock, etc (spi driver may call many times).
> *
> * IMPORTANT: this may be called when transfers to another
> --
> 2.25.1

2023-03-15 13:46:56

by Łukasz Stelmach

[permalink] [raw]

Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 02/15] net: Replace all spi->chip_select and spi->cs_gpiod references with function call

It was <2023-03-10 pią 23:02>, when Amit Kumar Mahapatra wrote:
> Supporting multi-cs in spi drivers would require the chip_select & cs_gpiod
> members of struct spi_device to be an array. But changing the type of these
> members to array would break the spi driver functionality. To make the
> transition smoother introduced four new APIs to get/set the
> spi->chip_select & spi->cs_gpiod and replaced all spi->chip_select and
> spi->cs_gpiod references with get or set API calls.
> While adding multi-cs support in further patches the chip_select & cs_gpiod
> members of the spi_device structure would be converted to arrays & the
> "idx" parameter of the APIs would be used as array index i.e.,
> spi->chip_select[idx] & spi->cs_gpiod[idx] respectively.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Michal Simek <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/adi/adin1110.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/asix/ax88796c_main.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/davicom/dm9051.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/qualcomm/qca_debug.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/wan/slic_ds26522.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/if_spi.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/wireless/silabs/wfx/bus_spi.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/cw1200_spi.c | 2 +-
> 9 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>

Reviewed-by: Lukasz Stelmach <[email protected]>

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/adi/adin1110.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/adi/adin1110.c
> index 3f316a0f4158..f5c2d7a9abc1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/adi/adin1110.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/adi/adin1110.c
> @@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ static int adin1110_register_mdiobus(struct adin1110_priv *priv,
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> snprintf(priv->mii_bus_name, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE, "%s-%u",
> - priv->cfg->name, priv->spidev->chip_select);
> + priv->cfg->name, spi_get_chipselect(priv->spidev, 0));
>
> mii_bus->name = priv->mii_bus_name;
> mii_bus->read = adin1110_mdio_read;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/asix/ax88796c_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/asix/ax88796c_main.c
> index 21376c79f671..e551ffaed20d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/asix/ax88796c_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/asix/ax88796c_main.c
> @@ -1006,7 +1006,7 @@ static int ax88796c_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> ax_local->mdiobus->parent = &spi->dev;
>
> snprintf(ax_local->mdiobus->id, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE,
> - "ax88796c-%s.%u", dev_name(&spi->dev), spi->chip_select);
> + "ax88796c-%s.%u", dev_name(&spi->dev), spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0));
>
> ret = devm_mdiobus_register(&spi->dev, ax_local->mdiobus);
> if (ret < 0) {
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/davicom/dm9051.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/davicom/dm9051.c
> index de7105a84747..70728b2e5f18 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/davicom/dm9051.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/davicom/dm9051.c
> @@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ static int dm9051_mdio_register(struct board_info *db)
> db->mdiobus->phy_mask = (u32)~BIT(1);
> db->mdiobus->parent = &spi->dev;
> snprintf(db->mdiobus->id, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE,
> - "dm9051-%s.%u", dev_name(&spi->dev), spi->chip_select);
> + "dm9051-%s.%u", dev_name(&spi->dev), spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0));
>
> ret = devm_mdiobus_register(&spi->dev, db->mdiobus);
> if (ret)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qualcomm/qca_debug.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/qualcomm/qca_debug.c
> index f62c39544e08..6f2fa2a42770 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qualcomm/qca_debug.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qualcomm/qca_debug.c
> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ qcaspi_info_show(struct seq_file *s, void *what)
> seq_printf(s, "SPI mode : %x\n",
> qca->spi_dev->mode);
> seq_printf(s, "SPI chip select : %u\n",
> - (unsigned int)qca->spi_dev->chip_select);
> + (unsigned int)spi_get_chipselect(qca->spi_dev, 0));
> seq_printf(s, "SPI legacy mode : %u\n",
> (unsigned int)qca->legacy_mode);
> seq_printf(s, "SPI burst length : %u\n",
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
> index e1a569b99e4a..7093a07141bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
> @@ -2967,7 +2967,7 @@ static int ca8210_test_interface_init(struct ca8210_priv *priv)
> sizeof(node_name),
> "ca8210@%d_%d",
> priv->spi->master->bus_num,
> - priv->spi->chip_select
> + spi_get_chipselect(priv->spi, 0)
> );
>
> test->ca8210_dfs_spi_int = debugfs_create_file(
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/slic_ds26522.c b/drivers/net/wan/slic_ds26522.c
> index 6063552cea9b..8a51cfcff99e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wan/slic_ds26522.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wan/slic_ds26522.c
> @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static int slic_ds26522_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>
> ret = slic_ds26522_init_configure(spi);
> if (ret == 0)
> - pr_info("DS26522 cs%d configured\n", spi->chip_select);
> + pr_info("DS26522 cs%d configured\n", spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0));
>
> return ret;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/if_spi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/if_spi.c
> index ff1c7ec8c450..1225fc0e3352 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/if_spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/if_spi.c
> @@ -1051,7 +1051,7 @@ static int if_spi_init_card(struct if_spi_card *card)
> "spi->max_speed_hz=%d\n",
> card->card_id, card->card_rev,
> card->spi->master->bus_num,
> - card->spi->chip_select,
> + spi_get_chipselect(card->spi, 0),
> card->spi->max_speed_hz);
> err = if_spi_prog_helper_firmware(card, helper);
> if (err)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/silabs/wfx/bus_spi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/silabs/wfx/bus_spi.c
> index 7fb1afb8ed31..160b90114aad 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/silabs/wfx/bus_spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/silabs/wfx/bus_spi.c
> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static int wfx_spi_probe(struct spi_device *func)
>
> /* Trace below is also displayed by spi_setup() if compiled with DEBUG */
> dev_dbg(&func->dev, "SPI params: CS=%d, mode=%d bits/word=%d speed=%d\n",
> - func->chip_select, func->mode, func->bits_per_word, func->max_speed_hz);
> + spi_get_chipselect(func, 0), func->mode, func->bits_per_word, func->max_speed_hz);
> if (func->bits_per_word != 16 && func->bits_per_word != 8)
> dev_warn(&func->dev, "unusual bits/word value: %d\n", func->bits_per_word);
> if (func->max_speed_hz > 50000000)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/cw1200_spi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/cw1200_spi.c
> index fe0d220da44d..c82c0688b549 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/cw1200_spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/cw1200_spi.c
> @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ static int cw1200_spi_probe(struct spi_device *func)
> func->mode = SPI_MODE_0;
>
> pr_info("cw1200_wlan_spi: Probe called (CS %d M %d BPW %d CLK %d)\n",
> - func->chip_select, func->mode, func->bits_per_word,
> + spi_get_chipselect(func, 0), func->mode, func->bits_per_word,
> func->max_speed_hz);
>
> if (cw1200_spi_on(plat_data)) {

--
Łukasz Stelmach
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics

Attachments:

signature.asc (487.00 B)

2023-03-20 19:24:16

by Mahapatra, Amit Kumar

[permalink] [raw]

Subject: RE: [PATCH V6 09/15] spi: Add stacked and parallel memories support in SPI core

Hello,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonas Gorski <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2023 9:30 PM
> To: Mahapatra, Amit Kumar <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; Mehta, Sanju <[email protected]>; chin-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; git (AMD-Xilinx)
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> Simek, Michal <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-rpi-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; linuxppc-
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 09/15] spi: Add stacked and parallel memories
> support in SPI core
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 18:37, Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > For supporting multiple CS the SPI device need to be aware of all the
> > CS values. So, the "chip_select" member in the spi_device structure is
> > now an array that holds all the CS values.
> >
> > spi_device structure now has a "cs_index_mask" member. This acts as an
> > index to the chip_select array. If nth bit of spi->cs_index_mask is
> > set then the driver would assert spi->chip_select[n].
> >
> > In parallel mode all the chip selects are asserted/de-asserted
> > simultaneously and each byte of data is stored in both devices, the
> > even bits in one, the odd bits in the other. The split is
> > automatically handled by the GQSPI controller. The GQSPI controller
> > supports a maximum of two flashes connected in parallel mode. A
> > "multi-cs-cap" flag is added in the spi controntroller data, through
> > ctlr->multi-cs-cap the spi core will make sure that the controller is
> > capable of handling multiple chip selects at once.
> >
> > For supporting multiple CS via GPIO the cs_gpiod member of the
> > spi_device structure is now an array that holds the gpio descriptor
> > for each chipselect.
> >
> > Multi CS support using GPIO is not tested due to unavailability of
> > necessary hardware setup.
>
> Can you pinmux your SPI controller's (cs) pins as GPIO? If so, you should be
> able use that for testing.
>

Xilinx Controller drivers that support multi cs are registered under
spi-mem framework. So even if I modify the pinmux the chip selection
will not go through the SPI core.
So, we cannot test the CS GPIO changes in SPI core on our platforms.

> >
> > Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-
> [email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/spi/spi.c | 225 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > include/linux/spi/spi.h | 34 ++++--
> > 2 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c index
> > c725b4bab7af..742bd688381c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
> > @@ -612,10 +612,17 @@ static int spi_dev_check(struct device *dev,
> > void *data) {
> > struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
> > struct spi_device *new_spi = data;
> > -
> > - if (spi->controller == new_spi->controller &&
> > - spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0) == spi_get_chipselect(new_spi, 0))
> > - return -EBUSY;
> > + int idx, nw_idx;
> > +
> > + if (spi->controller == new_spi->controller) {
> > + for (idx = 0; idx < SPI_CS_CNT_MAX; idx++) {
> > + for (nw_idx = 0; nw_idx < SPI_CS_CNT_MAX; nw_idx++) {
> > + if (spi_get_chipselect(spi, idx) ==
> > + spi_get_chipselect(new_spi, nw_idx))
> > + return -EBUSY;
> > + }
> > + }
>
> AFAICT unused chip selects are initialized to 0, so all single chip select devices
> would have it as their second one. This will then cause this check to reject
> every single chip select device after the first one. So you first need to make
> sure to only compare valid chip selects.
>
> So the loop condition should be something along idx <
> spi_get_num_chipselect(), not idx < SPI_CS_CNT_MAX.
>

Agreed, will update the loop condition as per num_cs.

> > + }
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -629,7 +636,7 @@ static int __spi_add_device(struct spi_device
> > *spi) {
> > struct spi_controller *ctlr = spi->controller;
> > struct device *dev = ctlr->dev.parent;
> > - int status;
> > + int status, idx;
> >
> > /*
> > * We need to make sure there's no other device with this @@
> > -638,8 +645,7 @@ static int __spi_add_device(struct spi_device *spi)
> > */
> > status = bus_for_each_dev(&spi_bus_type, NULL, spi, spi_dev_check);
> > if (status) {
> > - dev_err(dev, "chipselect %d already in use\n",
> > - spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0));
> > + dev_err(dev, "chipselect %d already in use\n",
> > + spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0));
>
> The message might be misleading for multi cs devices where the first one is
> free, but the second one is already in use.
>
> So maybe move this error message into spi_dev_check(), where you have
> that information available. You then even have the chance to state what is
> using the CS then, but that might be something for a different patch.
>
>

Agreed, I will move the error message to spi_dev_check().

> > return status;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -649,8 +655,10 @@ static int __spi_add_device(struct spi_device *spi)
> > return -ENODEV;
> > }
> >
> > - if (ctlr->cs_gpiods)
> > - spi_set_csgpiod(spi, 0, ctlr->cs_gpiods[spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0)]);
> > + if (ctlr->cs_gpiods) {
> > + for (idx = 0; idx < SPI_CS_CNT_MAX; idx++)
> > + spi_set_csgpiod(spi, idx, ctlr-
> >cs_gpiods[spi_get_chipselect(spi, idx)]);
> > + }
> >
> > /*
> > * Drivers may modify this initial i/o setup, but will @@
> > -690,13 +698,15 @@ int spi_add_device(struct spi_device *spi) {
> > struct spi_controller *ctlr = spi->controller;
> > struct device *dev = ctlr->dev.parent;
> > - int status;
> > + int status, idx;
> >
> > - /* Chipselects are numbered 0..max; validate. */
> > - if (spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0) >= ctlr->num_chipselect) {
> > - dev_err(dev, "cs%d >= max %d\n", spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0),
> > - ctlr->num_chipselect);
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > + for (idx = 0; idx < SPI_CS_CNT_MAX; idx++) {
> > + /* Chipselects are numbered 0..max; validate. */
> > + if (spi_get_chipselect(spi, idx) >= ctlr->num_chipselect) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "cs%d >= max %d\n", spi_get_chipselect(spi,
> idx),
> > + ctlr->num_chipselect);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > /* Set the bus ID string */
> > @@ -713,12 +723,15 @@ static int spi_add_device_locked(struct
> > spi_device *spi) {
> > struct spi_controller *ctlr = spi->controller;
> > struct device *dev = ctlr->dev.parent;
> > + int idx;
> >
> > - /* Chipselects are numbered 0..max; validate. */
> > - if (spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0) >= ctlr->num_chipselect) {
> > - dev_err(dev, "cs%d >= max %d\n", spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0),
> > - ctlr->num_chipselect);
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > + for (idx = 0; idx < SPI_CS_CNT_MAX; idx++) {
> > + /* Chipselects are numbered 0..max; validate. */
> > + if (spi_get_chipselect(spi, idx) >= ctlr->num_chipselect) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "cs%d >= max %d\n", spi_get_chipselect(spi,
> idx),
> > + ctlr->num_chipselect);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > /* Set the bus ID string */
> > @@ -966,58 +979,119 @@ static void spi_res_release(struct
> > spi_controller *ctlr, struct spi_message *mes static void
> > spi_set_cs(struct spi_device *spi, bool enable, bool force) {
> > bool activate = enable;
> > + u32 cs_num = __ffs(spi->cs_index_mask);
> > + int idx;
> >
> > /*
> > - * Avoid calling into the driver (or doing delays) if the chip select
> > - * isn't actually changing from the last time this was called.
> > + * In parallel mode all the chip selects are asserted/de-asserted
> > + * at once
> > */
> > - if (!force && ((enable && spi->controller->last_cs ==
> spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0)) ||
> > - (!enable && spi->controller->last_cs != spi_get_chipselect(spi,
> 0))) &&
> > - (spi->controller->last_cs_mode_high == (spi->mode &
> SPI_CS_HIGH)))
> > - return;
> > -
> > - trace_spi_set_cs(spi, activate);
> > -
> > - spi->controller->last_cs = enable ? spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0) : -1;
> > - spi->controller->last_cs_mode_high = spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH;
> > -
> > - if ((spi_get_csgpiod(spi, 0) || !spi->controller->set_cs_timing) &&
> !activate)
> > - spi_delay_exec(&spi->cs_hold, NULL);
> > -
> > - if (spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH)
> > - enable = !enable;
> > + if ((spi->cs_index_mask & SPI_PARALLEL_CS_MASK) ==
> SPI_PARALLEL_CS_MASK) {
> > + spi->controller->last_cs_mode_high = spi->mode &
> > + SPI_CS_HIGH;
> > +
> > + if ((spi_get_csgpiod(spi, 0) || !spi->controller->set_cs_timing) &&
> !activate)
> > + spi_delay_exec(&spi->cs_hold, NULL);
> > +
> > + if (spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH)
> > + enable = !enable;
> > +
> > + if (spi_get_csgpiod(spi, 0) && spi_get_csgpiod(spi, 1)) {
> > + if (!(spi->mode & SPI_NO_CS)) {
> > + /*
> > + * Historically ACPI has no means of the GPIO polarity
> and
> > + * thus the SPISerialBus() resource defines it on the per-
> chip
> > + * basis. In order to avoid a chain of negations, the GPIO
> > + * polarity is considered being Active High. Even for the
> cases
> > + * when _DSD() is involved (in the updated versions of
> ACPI)
> > + * the GPIO CS polarity must be defined Active High to
> avoid
> > + * ambiguity. That's why we use enable, that takes
> SPI_CS_HIGH
> > + * into account.
> > + */
> > + if (has_acpi_companion(&spi->dev)) {
> > + for (idx = 0; idx < SPI_CS_CNT_MAX; idx++)
> > + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(spi_get_csgpiod(spi,
> idx),
> > + !enable);
> > + } else {
> > + for (idx = 0; idx < SPI_CS_CNT_MAX; idx++)
> > + /* Polarity handled by GPIO library */
> > + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(spi_get_csgpiod(spi,
> idx),
> > + activate);
> > + }
> > + }
> > + /* Some SPI masters need both GPIO CS & slave_select */
> > + if ((spi->controller->flags & SPI_MASTER_GPIO_SS) &&
> > + spi->controller->set_cs)
> > + spi->controller->set_cs(spi, !enable);
>
> > + else if (spi->controller->set_cs)
> > + spi->controller->set_cs(spi, !enable);
>
> this else if belongs to the following brace as the else of the if
> (spi_get_csgpiod(spi, 0) && spi_get_csgpiod(spi, 1). Currently it would make

Agreed, will fix it in the next series.

> the first check redundant, as the second case would always be true if the first
> one is.
>
> Actually shouldn't you iterate over the cs's here in case one is using
> set_cs() and the other one is gpiod? You can only get here if both are backed
> by gpiods. And you would only set the first cs, but not the second one. The -
> >set_cs() callback doesn't allow specifying which of the (multiple) cs's should
> be set though.
>

After fixing the else if indentation we will get here if either one of the
CS support gpiod or both the CS support set_cs. Yes, one is using set_cs()
and the other one is gpiod use case handling is missing. I need to iterate
over the CS’s to find the CS GPIO, call gpiod_set_value_cansleep ( ) and
then call set_cs( ). In the set_cs( ) driver API the driver needs to first check
if any of the cs_index_mask enabled CS's is not a CS GPIO and then enable
only the non-gpio CS.
Please let me your thoughts on this approach.

> > + }
> >
> > - if (spi_get_csgpiod(spi, 0)) {
> > - if (!(spi->mode & SPI_NO_CS)) {
> > - /*
> > - * Historically ACPI has no means of the GPIO polarity and
> > - * thus the SPISerialBus() resource defines it on the per-chip
> > - * basis. In order to avoid a chain of negations, the GPIO
> > - * polarity is considered being Active High. Even for the cases
> > - * when _DSD() is involved (in the updated versions of ACPI)
> > - * the GPIO CS polarity must be defined Active High to avoid
> > - * ambiguity. That's why we use enable, that takes
> SPI_CS_HIGH
> > - * into account.
> > - */
> > - if (has_acpi_companion(&spi->dev))
> > - gpiod_set_value_cansleep(spi_get_csgpiod(spi, 0),
> !enable);
> > - else
> > - /* Polarity handled by GPIO library */
> > - gpiod_set_value_cansleep(spi_get_csgpiod(spi, 0),
> activate);
> > + for (idx = 0; idx < SPI_CS_CNT_MAX; idx++) {
> > + if (spi_get_csgpiod(spi, idx) || !spi->controller-
> >set_cs_timing) {
> > + if (activate)
> > + spi_delay_exec(&spi->cs_setup, NULL);
> > + else
> > + spi_delay_exec(&spi->cs_inactive, NULL);
> > + }
>
> Won't you delay twice if both CS's are backed by gpiod (and the controller
> does not implement set_cs_timing)? You should probably break after the
> first or so.
>

True, I will add a check to avoid extra delay.

> I wonder if it would makes sense to have a helper function to set cs state to
> all cs's indicated by cs_index_mask so you can share most of the logic
> between the single and multi cs paths.
>
> Currently it seems both paths have a lot of code (and comment) duplication,
> with the difference being one path is touching one cs and the other two (or
> all).
>

Agreed, will update the logic.

> > }
> > - /* Some SPI masters need both GPIO CS & slave_select */
> > - if ((spi->controller->flags & SPI_MASTER_GPIO_SS) &&
> > - spi->controller->set_cs)
> > + } else {
> > + /*
> > + * Avoid calling into the driver (or doing delays) if the chip select
> > + * isn't actually changing from the last time this was called.
> > + */
> > + if (!force && ((enable && spi->controller->last_cs ==
> > + spi_get_chipselect(spi, cs_num)) ||
> > + (!enable && spi->controller->last_cs !=
> > + spi_get_chipselect(spi, cs_num))) &&
> > + (spi->controller->last_cs_mode_high ==
> > + (spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH)))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + trace_spi_set_cs(spi, activate);
> > +
> > + spi->controller->last_cs = enable ? spi_get_chipselect(spi, cs_num)
> : -1;
> > + spi->controller->last_cs_mode_high = spi->mode &
> > + SPI_CS_HIGH;
> > +
> > + if ((spi_get_csgpiod(spi, cs_num) || !spi->controller-
> >set_cs_timing) && !activate)
> > + spi_delay_exec(&spi->cs_hold, NULL);
> > +
> > + if (spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH)
> > + enable = !enable;
> > +
> > + if (spi_get_csgpiod(spi, cs_num)) {
> > + if (!(spi->mode & SPI_NO_CS)) {
> > + /*
> > + * Historically ACPI has no means of the GPIO polarity
> and
> > + * thus the SPISerialBus() resource defines it on the per-
> chip
> > + * basis. In order to avoid a chain of negations, the GPIO
> > + * polarity is considered being Active High. Even for the
> cases
> > + * when _DSD() is involved (in the updated versions of
> ACPI)
> > + * the GPIO CS polarity must be defined Active High to
> avoid
> > + * ambiguity. That's why we use enable, that takes
> SPI_CS_HIGH
> > + * into account.
> > + */
> > + if (has_acpi_companion(&spi->dev))
> > + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(spi_get_csgpiod(spi,
> cs_num),
> > + !enable);
> > + else
> > + /* Polarity handled by GPIO library */
> > + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(spi_get_csgpiod(spi,
> cs_num),
> > + activate);
> > + }
> > + /* Some SPI masters need both GPIO CS & slave_select */
> > + if ((spi->controller->flags & SPI_MASTER_GPIO_SS) &&
> > + spi->controller->set_cs)
> > + spi->controller->set_cs(spi, !enable);
> > + } else if (spi->controller->set_cs) {
> > spi->controller->set_cs(spi, !enable);
> > - } else if (spi->controller->set_cs) {
> > - spi->controller->set_cs(spi, !enable);
> > - }
> > + }
> >
> > - if (spi_get_csgpiod(spi, 0) || !spi->controller->set_cs_timing) {
> > - if (activate)
> > - spi_delay_exec(&spi->cs_setup, NULL);
> > - else
> > - spi_delay_exec(&spi->cs_inactive, NULL);
> > + if (spi_get_csgpiod(spi, cs_num) || !spi->controller-
> >set_cs_timing) {
> > + if (activate)
> > + spi_delay_exec(&spi->cs_setup, NULL);
> > + else
> > + spi_delay_exec(&spi->cs_inactive, NULL);
> > + }
> > }
> > }
> >
> > @@ -2246,8 +2320,8 @@ static void of_spi_parse_dt_cs_delay(struct
> > device_node *nc, static int of_spi_parse_dt(struct spi_controller *ctlr,
> struct spi_device *spi,
> > struct device_node *nc) {
> > - u32 value;
> > - int rc;
> > + u32 value, cs[SPI_CS_CNT_MAX] = {0};
> > + int rc, idx;
> >
> > /* Mode (clock phase/polarity/etc.) */
> > if (of_property_read_bool(nc, "spi-cpha")) @@ -2320,13
> > +2394,21 @@ static int of_spi_parse_dt(struct spi_controller *ctlr, struct
> spi_device *spi,
> > }
> >
> > /* Device address */
> > - rc = of_property_read_u32(nc, "reg", &value);
> > - if (rc) {
> > + rc = of_property_read_variable_u32_array(nc, "reg", &cs[0], 1,
> > + SPI_CS_CNT_MAX);
> > + if (rc < 0 || rc > ctlr->num_chipselect) {
> > dev_err(&ctlr->dev, "%pOF has no valid 'reg' property (%d)\n",
> > nc, rc);
> > return rc;
> > + } else if ((of_property_read_bool(nc, "parallel-memories")) &&
> > + (!ctlr->multi_cs_cap)) {
> > + dev_err(&ctlr->dev, "SPI controller doesn't support multi CS\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > - spi_set_chipselect(spi, 0, value);
> > + for (idx = 0; idx < rc; idx++)
> > + spi_set_chipselect(spi, idx, cs[idx]);
> > + /* By default set the spi->cs_index_mask as 1 */
> > + spi->cs_index_mask = 0x01;
> >
> > /* Device speed */
> > if (!of_property_read_u32(nc, "spi-max-frequency", &value)) @@
> > -3846,6 +3928,7 @@ static int __spi_validate(struct spi_device *spi, struct
> spi_message *message)
> > struct spi_controller *ctlr = spi->controller;
> > struct spi_transfer *xfer;
> > int w_size;
> > + u32 cs_num = __ffs(spi->cs_index_mask);
> >
> > if (list_empty(&message->transfers))
> > return -EINVAL;
> > @@ -3858,7 +3941,7 @@ static int __spi_validate(struct spi_device *spi,
> struct spi_message *message)
> > * cs_change is set for each transfer.
> > */
> > if ((spi->mode & SPI_CS_WORD) && (!(ctlr->mode_bits &
> SPI_CS_WORD) ||
> > - spi_get_csgpiod(spi, 0))) {
> > + spi_get_csgpiod(spi,
> > + cs_num))) {
>
> Wouldn't you need to check for any of the cs_index_mask enabled CS's, and
> not just the first one? AFAICT you would currently fail to catch a
> SPI_CS_WORD transfer with both cs enabled where the first one is a
> SPI_CS_WORD capable native CS and the second one a gpiod.
>

That’s true, I will add a loop and check for each of the cs_index_mask
enabled CS's.

> > size_t maxsize;
> > int ret;
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/spi/spi.h b/include/linux/spi/spi.h index
> > bdb35a91b4bf..452682aa1a39 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/spi/spi.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/spi/spi.h
> > @@ -19,6 +19,11 @@
> > #include <linux/acpi.h>
> > #include <linux/u64_stats_sync.h>
> >
> > +/* Max no. of CS supported per spi device */ #define SPI_CS_CNT_MAX 2
> > +
> > +/* chip select mask */
> > +#define SPI_PARALLEL_CS_MASK (BIT(0) | BIT(1))
> > struct dma_chan;
> > struct software_node;
> > struct ptp_system_timestamp;
> > @@ -166,6 +171,7 @@ extern void
> spi_transfer_cs_change_delay_exec(struct spi_message *msg,
> > * deasserted. If @cs_change_delay is used from @spi_transfer, then
> the
> > * two delays will be added up.
> > * @pcpu_statistics: statistics for the spi_device
> > + * @cs_index_mask: Bit mask of the active chipselect(s) in the
> > + chipselect array
> > *
> > * A @spi_device is used to interchange data between an SPI slave
> > * (usually a discrete chip) and CPU memory.
> > @@ -181,7 +187,7 @@ struct spi_device {
> > struct spi_controller *controller;
> > struct spi_controller *master; /* Compatibility layer */
> > u32 max_speed_hz;
> > - u8 chip_select;
> > + u8 chip_select[SPI_CS_CNT_MAX];
> > u8 bits_per_word;
> > bool rt;
> > #define SPI_NO_TX BIT(31) /* No transmit wire */
> > @@ -202,7 +208,7 @@ struct spi_device {
> > void *controller_data;
> > char modalias[SPI_NAME_SIZE];
> > const char *driver_override;
> > - struct gpio_desc *cs_gpiod; /* Chip select gpio desc */
> > + struct gpio_desc *cs_gpiod[SPI_CS_CNT_MAX]; /* Chip select
> gpio desc */
> > struct spi_delay word_delay; /* Inter-word delay */
> > /* CS delays */
> > struct spi_delay cs_setup;
> > @@ -212,6 +218,13 @@ struct spi_device {
> > /* The statistics */
> > struct spi_statistics __percpu *pcpu_statistics;
> >
> > + /* Bit mask of the chipselect(s) that the driver need to use from
> > + * the chipselect array.When the controller is capable to handle
> > + * multiple chip selects & memories are connected in parallel
> > + * then more than one bit need to be set in cs_index_mask.
> > + */
> > + u32 cs_index_mask : 2;
>
> SPI_CS_CNT_MAX?
>

Agreed, will replace 2 with SPI_CS_CNT_MAX.

> > +
> > /*
> > * likely need more hooks for more protocol options affecting how
> > * the controller talks to each chip, like:
> > @@ -268,22 +281,22 @@ static inline void *spi_get_drvdata(struct
> > spi_device *spi)
> >
> > static inline u8 spi_get_chipselect(struct spi_device *spi, u8 idx)
> > {
> > - return spi->chip_select;
> > + return spi->chip_select[idx];
> > }
> >
> > static inline void spi_set_chipselect(struct spi_device *spi, u8 idx,
> > u8 chipselect) {
> > - spi->chip_select = chipselect;
> > + spi->chip_select[idx] = chipselect;
> > }
> >
> > static inline struct gpio_desc *spi_get_csgpiod(struct spi_device
> > *spi, u8 idx) {
> > - return spi->cs_gpiod;
> > + return spi->cs_gpiod[idx];
> > }
> >
> > static inline void spi_set_csgpiod(struct spi_device *spi, u8 idx,
> > struct gpio_desc *csgpiod) {
> > - spi->cs_gpiod = csgpiod;
> > + spi->cs_gpiod[idx] = csgpiod;
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -388,6 +401,8 @@ extern struct spi_device
> *spi_new_ancillary_device(struct spi_device *spi, u8 ch
> > * @bus_lock_spinlock: spinlock for SPI bus locking
> > * @bus_lock_mutex: mutex for exclusion of multiple callers
> > * @bus_lock_flag: indicates that the SPI bus is locked for exclusive
> > use
> > + * @multi_cs_cap: indicates that the SPI Controller can assert/de-assert
> > + * more than one chip select at once.
> > * @setup: updates the device mode and clocking records used by a
> > * device's SPI controller; protocol code may call this. This
> > * must fail if an unrecognized or unsupported mode is requested.
> > @@ -585,6 +600,13 @@ struct spi_controller {
> > /* Flag indicating that the SPI bus is locked for exclusive use */
> > bool bus_lock_flag;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Flag indicating that the spi-controller has multi chip select
> > + * capability and can assert/de-assert more than one chip select
> > + * at once.
> > + */
> > + bool multi_cs_cap;
>
> I admit I haven't followed the first iterations, but Is there a reason this isn't a
> SPI_XXX flag in spi.h? There seem to be quite a few free bits left.
>

Yes, it can be a SPI_XX flag as well. I will add a flag & remove this
structure member.

> I would think multi_cs can be emulated (somewhat) via gpiod for the second
> CS as long as the controller supports set_cs() (and SPI_NO_CS?).
>

It is not just about handling the CS's, but rather this flag indicates
that the controller can communicate (reading & writing data) with
both the devices simultaneously.

Regards,
Amit

> > +
> > /* Setup mode and clock, etc (spi driver may call many times).
> > *
> > * IMPORTANT: this may be called when transfers to another
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
>
> Regards
> Jonas