2013-05-06 04:33:25

by Jonghwan Choi

Subject: [PATCH 3.9-stable] mmc: dw_mmc: fix fifo access for 64-bit

This patch looks like it should be in the 3.9-stable tree, should we apply
it?

------------------

From: "Seungwon Jeon <[email protected]>"

commit c09fbd7451b797213b3df8bf077776b9ec33f954 upstream

mci_writew causes a failure of fifo access for 64-bit.
mci_writeq is correct.

Signed-off-by: Seungwon Jeon <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <[email protected]>
---
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
index 9834221..cc8d8de 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
@@ -1353,7 +1353,7 @@ static void dw_mci_push_data64(struct dw_mci *host,
void *buf, int cnt)
buf += len;
cnt -= len;
if (!sg_next(host->sg) || host->part_buf_count == 8) {
- mci_writew(host, DATA(host->data_offset),
+ mci_writeq(host, DATA(host->data_offset),
host->part_buf);
host->part_buf_count = 0;
}
--
1.7.9.5

2013-05-17 03:55:08

by Greg KH

Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.9-stable] mmc: dw_mmc: fix fifo access for 64-bit

On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 01:33:22PM +0900, Jonghwan Choi wrote:
> This patch looks like it should be in the 3.9-stable tree, should we apply
> it?

It doesn't apply to the 3.9 tree, so it's going to be bit hard to do
this...

sorry,

greg k-h