2019-04-26 14:50:28

by Jim Lin

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] usb: Add Clear_TT_Buffer support for XHCI

Jim Lin (6):
usb: hub:Extend usb_hub_clear_tt_buffer parameter
usb: isp1760:Adjusted for usb_hub_clear_tt_buffer
usb: fotg210:Adjusted for usb_hub_clear_tt_buffer
usb: ehci: Adjusted for usb_hub_clear_tt_buffer
usb: dwc2: Adjusted for usb_hub_clear_tt_buffer
usb: xhci: Add Clear_TT_Buffer

drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 5 +++--
drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd_intr.c | 2 +-
drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c | 2 +-
drivers/usb/host/fotg210-hcd.c | 2 +-
drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 7 +++++++
drivers/usb/host/xhci.h | 3 +++
drivers/usb/isp1760/isp1760-hcd.c | 5 +++--
include/linux/usb/hcd.h | 2 +-
9 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--
2.1.4


2019-04-26 15:35:58

by Alan Stern

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] usb: Add Clear_TT_Buffer support for XHCI

On Fri, 26 Apr 2019, Jim Lin wrote:

> Jim Lin (6):
> usb: hub:Extend usb_hub_clear_tt_buffer parameter
> usb: isp1760:Adjusted for usb_hub_clear_tt_buffer
> usb: fotg210:Adjusted for usb_hub_clear_tt_buffer
> usb: ehci: Adjusted for usb_hub_clear_tt_buffer
> usb: dwc2: Adjusted for usb_hub_clear_tt_buffer
> usb: xhci: Add Clear_TT_Buffer
>
> drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 5 +++--
> drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd_intr.c | 2 +-
> drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c | 2 +-
> drivers/usb/host/fotg210-hcd.c | 2 +-
> drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 7 +++++++
> drivers/usb/host/xhci.h | 3 +++
> drivers/usb/isp1760/isp1760-hcd.c | 5 +++--
> include/linux/usb/hcd.h | 2 +-
> 9 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

This doesn't explain anything. After reading the patches, I could see
that patches 2-5 are needed in order to work with patch 1, but I don't
know why patch 1 was needed in the first place. It looks like patch 1
forces callers to add an extra argument containing information that is
already available, so why is the extra argument needed?

In any case, this is the sort of the thing you should explain to people
instead of forcing them to figure it out for themselves.

Alan Stern

2019-04-29 09:42:05

by Jim Lin

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] usb: Add Clear_TT_Buffer support for XHCI

Thanks for review.

Abandon this series of patches.

And will send out another minimized patch later.

Jim


On 2019年04月26日 23:34, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019, Jim Lin wrote:
>
>> Jim Lin (6):
>> usb: hub:Extend usb_hub_clear_tt_buffer parameter
>> usb: isp1760:Adjusted for usb_hub_clear_tt_buffer
>> usb: fotg210:Adjusted for usb_hub_clear_tt_buffer
>> usb: ehci: Adjusted for usb_hub_clear_tt_buffer
>> usb: dwc2: Adjusted for usb_hub_clear_tt_buffer
>> usb: xhci: Add Clear_TT_Buffer
>>
>> drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 5 +++--
>> drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd_intr.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/usb/host/fotg210-hcd.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 7 +++++++
>> drivers/usb/host/xhci.h | 3 +++
>> drivers/usb/isp1760/isp1760-hcd.c | 5 +++--
>> include/linux/usb/hcd.h | 2 +-
>> 9 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> This doesn't explain anything. After reading the patches, I could see
> that patches 2-5 are needed in order to work with patch 1, but I don't
> know why patch 1 was needed in the first place. It looks like patch 1
> forces callers to add an extra argument containing information that is
> already available, so why is the extra argument needed?
>
> In any case, this is the sort of the thing you should explain to people
> instead of forcing them to figure it out for themselves.
>
> Alan Stern
>
--nvpublic