2006-10-31 05:40:05

by Jesse Huang

Subject: How about current IP100A status? 10/31/2006

Dear All:

How about current IP100A, sundance.c status? Should it be put into kernel or
not?
Is there any sentence should I need to modify?

Thanks for your help!

Jesse Huang

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jesse Huang" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2006 3:57 AM
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] Solve host error problem in low performance
embeddedsystem when continune down and up.


From: Jesse Huang <[email protected]>

2006-11-02 05:21:10

by Jeff Garzik

Subject: Re: How about current IP100A status? 10/31/2006

Jesse Huang wrote:
> Dear All:
>
> How about current IP100A, sundance.c status? Should it be put into kernel or
> not?
> Is there any sentence should I need to modify?

It's in my queue. We are in a bug fix-only cycle right now, so it has
been a bit lower priority, but I will queue it for 2.6.20.

Jeff

2006-11-02 07:58:19

by Jesse Huang

Subject: Re: How about current IP100A status? 10/31/2006

Dear Jeff:

Thanks for your help. We are happy to see new version of
our driver will be support in the new kernel.

Best Regards,
Jesse Huang


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Garzik" <[email protected]>
To: "Jesse Huang" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 1:21 PM
Subject: Re: How about current IP100A status? 10/31/2006


Jesse Huang wrote:
> Dear All:
>
> How about current IP100A, sundance.c status? Should it be put into kernel
or
> not?
> Is there any sentence should I need to modify?

It's in my queue. We are in a bug fix-only cycle right now, so it has
been a bit lower priority, but I will queue it for 2.6.20.

Jeff