2010-11-09 05:39:49

by Tomoya MORINAGA

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: A MMC card transfer issue

I am facing the issue about some MMC cards on Intel EG20T PCH (Platform Controller Hub).
The linux version is 2.6.36.
I can not transfer data the MMC cards (e.g. Transcned MMC card).
The card is 1 bit bus width. And the card is according to MMC specification V3.x.
And the EG20T has a 4 bit bus width capability
Linux MMC standard driver decides the card bus width as 4 bit,
if the MMC specification version is larger than or equal to V4.0 like below.

linux/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c

505 /*
506 * Activate wide bus (if supported).
507 */
508 if ((card->csd.mmca_vsn >= CSD_SPEC_VER_4) &&
509 (host->caps & (MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA | MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA))) {
510 unsigned ext_csd_bit, bus_width;
511
512 if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA) {
513 ext_csd_bit = EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_8;
514 bus_width = MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8;
515 } else {
516 ext_csd_bit = EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_4;
517 bus_width = MMC_BUS_WIDTH_4;
518 }
519
520 err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
521 EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH, ext_csd_bit);
522
523 if (err && err != -EBADMSG)
524 goto free_card;
525
526 if (err) {
527 printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: switch to bus width %d "
528 "failed\n", mmc_hostname(card->host),
529 1 << bus_width);
530 err = 0;
531 } else {
532 mmc_set_bus_width(card->host, bus_width);
533 }
534 }
535

However the MMC specification version id is the same as V3.x and V4.0.
Therefore the driver uses the 4 bit bus width for the MMC card
even if the card has only 1 bit bus width.
I modified the driver to use 1 bit bus width only tentatively and confirmed that
we can mount the card and R/W correctly.

I think we can not support MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA or MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA in MMC V4.0.

How do you think ?

--
Thanks,
Tomoya MORINAGA(OKI SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.)


2010-11-09 05:53:04

by Kyungmin Park

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: A MMC card transfer issue

2010/11/9 Tomoya MORINAGA <[email protected]>:
> I am facing the issue about some MMC cards on Intel EG20T PCH (Platform Controller Hub).
> The linux version is 2.6.36.
> I can not transfer data the MMC cards (e.g. Transcned MMC card).
> The card is 1 bit bus width. And the card is according to MMC specification V3.x.
> And the EG20T has a 4 bit bus width capability
> Linux MMC standard driver decides the card bus width as 4 bit,
> if the MMC specification version is larger than or equal to V4.0 like below.
>
> linux/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>
> ?505 ? ? ? ?/*
> ?506 ? ? ? ? * Activate wide bus (if supported).
> ?507 ? ? ? ? */
> ?508 ? ? ? ?if ((card->csd.mmca_vsn >= CSD_SPEC_VER_4) &&
> ?509 ? ? ? ? ? ?(host->caps & (MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA | MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA))) {
> ?510 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?unsigned ext_csd_bit, bus_width;
> ?511
> ?512 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA) {
> ?513 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?ext_csd_bit = EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_8;
> ?514 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?bus_width = MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8;
> ?515 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?} else {
> ?516 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?ext_csd_bit = EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_4;
> ?517 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?bus_width = MMC_BUS_WIDTH_4;
> ?518 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?}
> ?519
> ?520 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
> ?521 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH, ext_csd_bit);
> ?522
> ?523 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?if (err && err != -EBADMSG)
> ?524 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?goto free_card;
> ?525
> ?526 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?if (err) {
> ?527 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: switch to bus width %d "
> ?528 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? "failed\n", mmc_hostname(card->host),
> ?529 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 1 << bus_width);
> ?530 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?err = 0;
> ?531 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?} else {
> ?532 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?mmc_set_bus_width(card->host, bus_width);
> ?533 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?}
> ?534 ? ? ? ?}
> ?535
>
> However the MMC specification version id is the same as V3.x and V4.0.
> Therefore the driver uses the 4 bit bus width for the MMC card
> even if the card has only 1 bit bus width.
> I modified the driver to use 1 bit bus width only tentatively and confirmed that
> we can mount the card and R/W correctly.
>
> I think we can not support MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA or MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA in MMC V4.0.
>
> How do you think ?

You can find a patch for 4-bit support. the problem is there's some
bug related so it set the 4 & 8 bit support both.
So line 512 is always true. you can just remove the one line like this.

It's quirk-and-dirty patch. now we try to find a generic solution to
solve this issue.
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -1849,7 +1849,7 @@ int sdhci_add_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ;

if (!(host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_FORCE_1_BIT_DATA))
- mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA | MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA;
+ mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA;

if (caps & SDHCI_CAN_DO_HISPD)
mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED | MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED;

Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Tomoya MORINAGA(OKI SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.)
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at ?http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

2010-11-09 07:29:39

by Tomoya MORINAGA

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: A MMC card transfer issue

Hi Park,

Thank you for your information.
I will try it soon.

Thanks,
Tomoya MORINAGA
OKI SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kyungmin Park" <[email protected]>
To: "Tomoya MORINAGA" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; "Andrew"" <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: A MMC card transfer issue


> 2010/11/9 Tomoya MORINAGA <[email protected]>:
> > I am facing the issue about some MMC cards on Intel EG20T PCH (Platform Controller Hub).
> > The linux version is 2.6.36.
> > I can not transfer data the MMC cards (e.g. Transcned MMC card).
> > The card is 1 bit bus width. And the card is according to MMC specification V3.x.
> > And the EG20T has a 4 bit bus width capability
> > Linux MMC standard driver decides the card bus width as 4 bit,
> > if the MMC specification version is larger than or equal to V4.0 like below.
> >
> > linux/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> >
> > 505 /*
> > 506 * Activate wide bus (if supported).
> > 507 */
> > 508 if ((card->csd.mmca_vsn >= CSD_SPEC_VER_4) &&
> > 509 (host->caps & (MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA | MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA))) {
> > 510 unsigned ext_csd_bit, bus_width;
> > 511
> > 512 if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA) {
> > 513 ext_csd_bit = EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_8;
> > 514 bus_width = MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8;
> > 515 } else {
> > 516 ext_csd_bit = EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_4;
> > 517 bus_width = MMC_BUS_WIDTH_4;
> > 518 }
> > 519
> > 520 err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
> > 521 EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH, ext_csd_bit);
> > 522
> > 523 if (err && err != -EBADMSG)
> > 524 goto free_card;
> > 525
> > 526 if (err) {
> > 527 printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: switch to bus width %d "
> > 528 "failed\n", mmc_hostname(card->host),
> > 529 1 << bus_width);
> > 530 err = 0;
> > 531 } else {
> > 532 mmc_set_bus_width(card->host, bus_width);
> > 533 }
> > 534 }
> > 535
> >
> > However the MMC specification version id is the same as V3.x and V4.0.
> > Therefore the driver uses the 4 bit bus width for the MMC card
> > even if the card has only 1 bit bus width.
> > I modified the driver to use 1 bit bus width only tentatively and confirmed that
> > we can mount the card and R/W correctly.
> >
> > I think we can not support MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA or MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA in MMC V4.0.
> >
> > How do you think ?
>
> You can find a patch for 4-bit support. the problem is there's some
> bug related so it set the 4 & 8 bit support both.
> So line 512 is always true. you can just remove the one line like this.
>
> It's quirk-and-dirty patch. now we try to find a generic solution to
> solve this issue.
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -1849,7 +1849,7 @@ int sdhci_add_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
> mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ;
>
> if (!(host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_FORCE_1_BIT_DATA))
> - mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA | MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA;
> + mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA;
>
> if (caps & SDHCI_CAN_DO_HISPD)
> mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED | MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED;
>
> Thank you,
> Kyungmin Park
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > Tomoya MORINAGA(OKI SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.)
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> > the body of a message to [email protected]
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

2010-11-11 02:59:25

by Tomoya MORINAGA

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: A MMC card transfer issue

Hi Park,

Though I tried to patch yours to "sdhci.c" of linux-2.6.36,
but it seems your patch has already patched in linux-2.6.36.

Using this linux, MMC card is not recognized.
Inserting the MMC card, I saw the following erro message.

[ 11.035441] sdhci: Secure Digital Host Controller Interface driver
[ 11.035450] sdhci: Copyright(c) Pierre Ossman
[ 11.058295] sdhci-pci 0000:02:04.0: SDHCI controller found [8086:8809] (rev 1)
[ 11.058342] alloc irq_desc for 18 on node -1
[ 11.058350] alloc kstat_irqs on node -1
[ 11.058373] sdhci-pci 0000:02:04.0: PCI INT C -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
[ 11.058385] sdhci-pci 0000:02:04.0: Invalid iomem size. You may experience problems.
[ 11.058487] sdhci-pci 0000:02:04.0: setting latency timer to 64
[ 11.058623] Registered led device: mmc0::
[ 11.058736] mmc0: SDHCI controller on PCI [0000:02:04.0] using DMA
[ 11.058774] sdhci-pci 0000:02:04.1: SDHCI controller found [8086:880a] (rev 1)
[ 11.058816] sdhci-pci 0000:02:04.1: PCI INT C -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
[ 11.058828] sdhci-pci 0000:02:04.1: Invalid iomem size. You may experience problems.
[ 11.058904] sdhci-pci 0000:02:04.1: setting latency timer to 64
[ 11.059047] Registered led device: mmc1::
[ 11.059153] mmc1: SDHCI controller on PCI [0000:02:04.1] using DMA
[ 11.547645] mmc1: new high speed SD card at address 0ec7
[ 11.629400] mmcblk0: mmc1:0ec7 SV02G 1.87 GiB (ro)
[ 11.630314] mmcblk0: p1
[ 12.076459] gzip used greatest stack depth: 6008 bytes left
[ 12.321795] ip used greatest stack depth: 5724 bytes left
[ 13.786510] EXT3-fs (dm-0): using internal journal
[ 13.887463] EXT3-fs: barriers not enabled
[ 13.887872] kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
[ 13.888154] EXT3-fs (sda1): using internal journal
[ 13.888178] EXT3-fs (sda1): mounted filesystem with writeback data mode
[ 23.183874] Adding 2064380k swap on /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol01. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:2064380k
[ 39.171225] gconfd-2 used greatest stack depth: 5692 bytes left
[ 86.545435] metacity[2318]: segfault at 0 ip 080aa093 sp bfd899a0 error 4 in metacity[8048000+82000]
[ 115.124784] hda-intel: Invalid position buffer, using LPIB read method instead.
[ 115.124821] hda-intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj.
[ 346.630117] mmc1: card 0ec7 removed
[ 408.266730] mmc1: new MMC card at address 0001
[ 408.268142] mmcblk0: mmc1:0001 MMC 1.87 GiB
[ 408.275970] mmcblk0: retrying using single block read
[ 408.278451] mmcblk0: error -84 transferring data, sector 0, nr 8, card status 0x900
[ 408.278464] end_request: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 0
[ 408.280966] mmcblk0: error -84 transferring data, sector 1, nr 7, card status 0x900
[ 408.280978] end_request: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 1


I have suspected mmc.c is buggy.
I tried to disable like the following in "mmc_init_card".
As a result, the MMC card to be recognized correctly.
What's do you think ?

*/
static int mmc_init_card(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr,
struct mmc_card *oldcard)
{
......

/*
* Activate wide bus (if supported).
*/
#if 0 //101111
if ((card->csd.mmca_vsn >= CSD_SPEC_VER_4) &&
(host->caps & (MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA | MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA))) {
unsigned ext_csd_bit, bus_width;

if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA) {
ext_csd_bit = EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_8;
bus_width = MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8;
} else {
ext_csd_bit = EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_4;
bus_width = MMC_BUS_WIDTH_4;
}

err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH, ext_csd_bit);

if (err && err != -EBADMSG)
goto free_card;

if (err) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: switch to bus width %d "
"failed\n", mmc_hostname(card->host),
1 << bus_width);
err = 0;
} else {
mmc_set_bus_width(card->host, bus_width);
}
}
#endif //101111




------
Thanks,

Tomoya MORINAGA
OKI SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Kyungmin Park" <[email protected]>
To: "Tomoya MORINAGA" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; "Andrew"" <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: A MMC card transfer issue


> 2010/11/9 Tomoya MORINAGA <[email protected]>:
> > I am facing the issue about some MMC cards on Intel EG20T PCH (Platform Controller Hub).
> > The linux version is 2.6.36.
> > I can not transfer data the MMC cards (e.g. Transcned MMC card).
> > The card is 1 bit bus width. And the card is according to MMC specification V3.x.
> > And the EG20T has a 4 bit bus width capability
> > Linux MMC standard driver decides the card bus width as 4 bit,
> > if the MMC specification version is larger than or equal to V4.0 like below.
> >
> > linux/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> >
> > 505 /*
> > 506 * Activate wide bus (if supported).
> > 507 */
> > 508 if ((card->csd.mmca_vsn >= CSD_SPEC_VER_4) &&
> > 509 (host->caps & (MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA | MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA))) {
> > 510 unsigned ext_csd_bit, bus_width;
> > 511
> > 512 if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA) {
> > 513 ext_csd_bit = EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_8;
> > 514 bus_width = MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8;
> > 515 } else {
> > 516 ext_csd_bit = EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_4;
> > 517 bus_width = MMC_BUS_WIDTH_4;
> > 518 }
> > 519
> > 520 err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
> > 521 EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH, ext_csd_bit);
> > 522
> > 523 if (err && err != -EBADMSG)
> > 524 goto free_card;
> > 525
> > 526 if (err) {
> > 527 printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: switch to bus width %d "
> > 528 "failed\n", mmc_hostname(card->host),
> > 529 1 << bus_width);
> > 530 err = 0;
> > 531 } else {
> > 532 mmc_set_bus_width(card->host, bus_width);
> > 533 }
> > 534 }
> > 535
> >
> > However the MMC specification version id is the same as V3.x and V4.0.
> > Therefore the driver uses the 4 bit bus width for the MMC card
> > even if the card has only 1 bit bus width.
> > I modified the driver to use 1 bit bus width only tentatively and confirmed that
> > we can mount the card and R/W correctly.
> >
> > I think we can not support MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA or MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA in MMC V4.0.
> >
> > How do you think ?
>
> You can find a patch for 4-bit support. the problem is there's some
> bug related so it set the 4 & 8 bit support both.
> So line 512 is always true. you can just remove the one line like this.
>
> It's quirk-and-dirty patch. now we try to find a generic solution to
> solve this issue.
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -1849,7 +1849,7 @@ int sdhci_add_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
> mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ;
>
> if (!(host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_FORCE_1_BIT_DATA))
> - mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA | MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA;
> + mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA;
>
> if (caps & SDHCI_CAN_DO_HISPD)
> mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED | MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED;
>
> Thank you,
> Kyungmin Park
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > Tomoya MORINAGA(OKI SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.)
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> > the body of a message to [email protected]
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

2010-12-01 01:08:46

by Tomoya MORINAGA

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: A MMC card transfer issue

Hi Park,

How's the issue going ?

With best regards.
---
Tomoya MORINAGA
OKI SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tomoya MORINAGA" <[email protected]>
To: "Kyungmin Park" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>; "Andrew"" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: A MMC card transfer issue


> Hi Park,
>
> Though I tried to patch yours to "sdhci.c" of linux-2.6.36,
> but it seems your patch has already patched in linux-2.6.36.
>
> Using this linux, MMC card is not recognized.
> Inserting the MMC card, I saw the following erro message.
>
> [ 11.035441] sdhci: Secure Digital Host Controller Interface driver
> [ 11.035450] sdhci: Copyright(c) Pierre Ossman
> [ 11.058295] sdhci-pci 0000:02:04.0: SDHCI controller found [8086:8809] (rev 1)
> [ 11.058342] alloc irq_desc for 18 on node -1
> [ 11.058350] alloc kstat_irqs on node -1
> [ 11.058373] sdhci-pci 0000:02:04.0: PCI INT C -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
> [ 11.058385] sdhci-pci 0000:02:04.0: Invalid iomem size. You may experience problems.
> [ 11.058487] sdhci-pci 0000:02:04.0: setting latency timer to 64
> [ 11.058623] Registered led device: mmc0::
> [ 11.058736] mmc0: SDHCI controller on PCI [0000:02:04.0] using DMA
> [ 11.058774] sdhci-pci 0000:02:04.1: SDHCI controller found [8086:880a] (rev 1)
> [ 11.058816] sdhci-pci 0000:02:04.1: PCI INT C -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
> [ 11.058828] sdhci-pci 0000:02:04.1: Invalid iomem size. You may experience problems.
> [ 11.058904] sdhci-pci 0000:02:04.1: setting latency timer to 64
> [ 11.059047] Registered led device: mmc1::
> [ 11.059153] mmc1: SDHCI controller on PCI [0000:02:04.1] using DMA
> [ 11.547645] mmc1: new high speed SD card at address 0ec7
> [ 11.629400] mmcblk0: mmc1:0ec7 SV02G 1.87 GiB (ro)
> [ 11.630314] mmcblk0: p1
> [ 12.076459] gzip used greatest stack depth: 6008 bytes left
> [ 12.321795] ip used greatest stack depth: 5724 bytes left
> [ 13.786510] EXT3-fs (dm-0): using internal journal
> [ 13.887463] EXT3-fs: barriers not enabled
> [ 13.887872] kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
> [ 13.888154] EXT3-fs (sda1): using internal journal
> [ 13.888178] EXT3-fs (sda1): mounted filesystem with writeback data mode
> [ 23.183874] Adding 2064380k swap on /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol01. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:2064380k
> [ 39.171225] gconfd-2 used greatest stack depth: 5692 bytes left
> [ 86.545435] metacity[2318]: segfault at 0 ip 080aa093 sp bfd899a0 error 4 in metacity[8048000+82000]
> [ 115.124784] hda-intel: Invalid position buffer, using LPIB read method instead.
> [ 115.124821] hda-intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj.
> [ 346.630117] mmc1: card 0ec7 removed
> [ 408.266730] mmc1: new MMC card at address 0001
> [ 408.268142] mmcblk0: mmc1:0001 MMC 1.87 GiB
> [ 408.275970] mmcblk0: retrying using single block read
> [ 408.278451] mmcblk0: error -84 transferring data, sector 0, nr 8, card status 0x900
> [ 408.278464] end_request: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 0
> [ 408.280966] mmcblk0: error -84 transferring data, sector 1, nr 7, card status 0x900
> [ 408.280978] end_request: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 1
>
>
> I have suspected mmc.c is buggy.
> I tried to disable like the following in "mmc_init_card".
> As a result, the MMC card to be recognized correctly.
> What's do you think ?
>
> */
> static int mmc_init_card(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr,
> struct mmc_card *oldcard)
> {
> ......
>
> /*
> * Activate wide bus (if supported).
> */
> #if 0 //101111
> if ((card->csd.mmca_vsn >= CSD_SPEC_VER_4) &&
> (host->caps & (MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA | MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA))) {
> unsigned ext_csd_bit, bus_width;
>
> if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA) {
> ext_csd_bit = EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_8;
> bus_width = MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8;
> } else {
> ext_csd_bit = EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_4;
> bus_width = MMC_BUS_WIDTH_4;
> }
>
> err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
> EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH, ext_csd_bit);
>
> if (err && err != -EBADMSG)
> goto free_card;
>
> if (err) {
> printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: switch to bus width %d "
> "failed\n", mmc_hostname(card->host),
> 1 << bus_width);
> err = 0;
> } else {
> mmc_set_bus_width(card->host, bus_width);
> }
> }
> #endif //101111
>
>
>
>
> ------
> Thanks,
>
> Tomoya MORINAGA
> OKI SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kyungmin Park" <[email protected]>
> To: "Tomoya MORINAGA" <[email protected]>
> Cc: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; "Andrew"" <[email protected]>;
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 2:53 PM
> Subject: Re: A MMC card transfer issue
>
>
> > 2010/11/9 Tomoya MORINAGA <[email protected]>:
> > > I am facing the issue about some MMC cards on Intel EG20T PCH (Platform Controller Hub).
> > > The linux version is 2.6.36.
> > > I can not transfer data the MMC cards (e.g. Transcned MMC card).
> > > The card is 1 bit bus width. And the card is according to MMC specification V3.x.
> > > And the EG20T has a 4 bit bus width capability
> > > Linux MMC standard driver decides the card bus width as 4 bit,
> > > if the MMC specification version is larger than or equal to V4.0 like below.
> > >
> > > linux/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> > >
> > > 505 /*
> > > 506 * Activate wide bus (if supported).
> > > 507 */
> > > 508 if ((card->csd.mmca_vsn >= CSD_SPEC_VER_4) &&
> > > 509 (host->caps & (MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA | MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA))) {
> > > 510 unsigned ext_csd_bit, bus_width;
> > > 511
> > > 512 if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA) {
> > > 513 ext_csd_bit = EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_8;
> > > 514 bus_width = MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8;
> > > 515 } else {
> > > 516 ext_csd_bit = EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_4;
> > > 517 bus_width = MMC_BUS_WIDTH_4;
> > > 518 }
> > > 519
> > > 520 err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
> > > 521 EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH, ext_csd_bit);
> > > 522
> > > 523 if (err && err != -EBADMSG)
> > > 524 goto free_card;
> > > 525
> > > 526 if (err) {
> > > 527 printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: switch to bus width %d "
> > > 528 "failed\n", mmc_hostname(card->host),
> > > 529 1 << bus_width);
> > > 530 err = 0;
> > > 531 } else {
> > > 532 mmc_set_bus_width(card->host, bus_width);
> > > 533 }
> > > 534 }
> > > 535
> > >
> > > However the MMC specification version id is the same as V3.x and V4.0.
> > > Therefore the driver uses the 4 bit bus width for the MMC card
> > > even if the card has only 1 bit bus width.
> > > I modified the driver to use 1 bit bus width only tentatively and confirmed that
> > > we can mount the card and R/W correctly.
> > >
> > > I think we can not support MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA or MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA in MMC V4.0.
> > >
> > > How do you think ?
> >
> > You can find a patch for 4-bit support. the problem is there's some
> > bug related so it set the 4 & 8 bit support both.
> > So line 512 is always true. you can just remove the one line like this.
> >
> > It's quirk-and-dirty patch. now we try to find a generic solution to
> > solve this issue.
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> > @@ -1849,7 +1849,7 @@ int sdhci_add_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
> > mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ;
> >
> > if (!(host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_FORCE_1_BIT_DATA))
> > - mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA | MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA;
> > + mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA;
> >
> > if (caps & SDHCI_CAN_DO_HISPD)
> > mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED | MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED;
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Kyungmin Park
> > >
> > > --
> > > Thanks,
> > > Tomoya MORINAGA(OKI SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.)
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> > > the body of a message to [email protected]
> > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to [email protected]
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>