Hmmm,
could the list owner please remove the luser sending this message ?
Rik
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 21:23:44 -0000
From: Trash <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Automatic Reply from Trash
Your message :-
"Re: Scalability problem (kmap_lock) with -aa kernels" on Wed, 20 Mar 2002 16:35:16 -0300 (BRT)
has been trashed.
All e-mail from you has been barred permanently from
being received by any e-mail addresses at this site -
please take your spam and numerous mailing list to
which I have never subscribed and put them elsewhere
From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 18:33:04 -0300 (BRT)
could the list owner please remove the luser sending this message ?
I can't, there is no trash@* or *@thux.net subscribed to any
list.
If this idiot would put a full received: header trace to his
bounces we could actually do something.
David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 18:33:04 -0300 (BRT)
>
> could the list owner please remove the luser sending this message ?
>
> I can't, there is no trash@* or *@thux.net subscribed to any
> list.
>
> If this idiot would put a full received: header trace to his
> bounces we could actually do something.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
There's always the post-notice, contents don't change. We can ban him.
Thunder
--
begin-base64 755 -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====
Extract this and see what will happen if you execute my
signature. Just save it to file and do a
> uudecode $file | perl
From: Thunder from the hill <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 14:22:47 -0700
There's always the post-notice, contents don't change. We can ban him.
How could we "ban him" if he was sending the auto-replies to the
people making list postings, not to the list itself? That is
what this guy was doing.
David S. Miller wrote:
> How could we "ban him" if he was sending the auto-replies to the
> people making list postings, not to the list itself? That is
> what this guy was doing.
He was? Did he stop posting?
The people which were victims (I was, too) can still ban him.
Thunder
--
Thunder from the hill.
Citizen of our universe.
----- Original Message -----
From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 11:00 PM
Subject: Re: Automatic Reply from Trash (fwd)
> I can't, there is no trash@* or *@thux.net subscribed to any
> list.
Common behavior, they use FAKE e-mails, fake headers and fake domain names.
Here in Germany, a lot of serious free-mail providers have complained about
the illegal abuse of their domain names. Thus, this has the effect to
entertain suspicion of the (innocent) free-mail provider.
> If this idiot would put a full received: header trace to his
> bounces we could actually do something.
Haha, just as probable as a burglar leaving his address and phone # for you
on the dining table after burglarizing your home <grin> ;-)
Andreas, quite experienced in handling all kinds of unwanted spam *sigh*