__kmalloc_node() is considered an "internal" function to the Slab, so
drop it from explicit testing.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
---
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
---
lib/fortify_kunit.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/fortify_kunit.c b/lib/fortify_kunit.c
index 39da5b3bc649..f9cc467334ce 100644
--- a/lib/fortify_kunit.c
+++ b/lib/fortify_kunit.c
@@ -235,9 +235,6 @@ static void fortify_test_alloc_size_##allocator##_dynamic(struct kunit *test) \
kmalloc_array_node(alloc_size, 1, gfp, NUMA_NO_NODE), \
kfree(p)); \
checker(expected_size, __kmalloc(alloc_size, gfp), \
- kfree(p)); \
- checker(expected_size, \
- __kmalloc_node(alloc_size, gfp, NUMA_NO_NODE), \
kfree(p)); \
\
orig = kmalloc(alloc_size, gfp); \
--
2.34.1
On 5/31/24 8:57 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> __kmalloc_node() is considered an "internal" function to the Slab, so
> drop it from explicit testing.
So is __kmalloc() and so I have the removal of both as part of the cleanup here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
which reminds me I should put it to -next at this point. Review still welcome :)
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
> ---
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> ---
> lib/fortify_kunit.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/fortify_kunit.c b/lib/fortify_kunit.c
> index 39da5b3bc649..f9cc467334ce 100644
> --- a/lib/fortify_kunit.c
> +++ b/lib/fortify_kunit.c
> @@ -235,9 +235,6 @@ static void fortify_test_alloc_size_##allocator##_dynamic(struct kunit *test) \
> kmalloc_array_node(alloc_size, 1, gfp, NUMA_NO_NODE), \
> kfree(p)); \
> checker(expected_size, __kmalloc(alloc_size, gfp), \
> - kfree(p)); \
> - checker(expected_size, \
> - __kmalloc_node(alloc_size, gfp, NUMA_NO_NODE), \
> kfree(p)); \
> \
> orig = kmalloc(alloc_size, gfp); \