Hi all,
After merging the mm-hotfixes tree, today's linux-next build (arm
allmodconfig) failed like this:
mm/vmscan.c:4090:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘pmd_young’; did you mean ‘pte_young’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Caused by commit
3f85e711d5af ("mm: introduce arch_has_hw_nonleaf_pmd_young()")
This error was found by the kernel.ci bot and so is still int today's
tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
On 25.11.22 02:10, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the mm-hotfixes tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> mm/vmscan.c:4090:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘pmd_young’; did you mean ‘pte_young’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 3f85e711d5af ("mm: introduce arch_has_hw_nonleaf_pmd_young()")
A patch fixing this is available already (see attached mail).
Juergen
On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 12:10:51 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the mm-hotfixes tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> mm/vmscan.c:4090:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘pmd_young’; did you mean ‘pte_young’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 3f85e711d5af ("mm: introduce arch_has_hw_nonleaf_pmd_young()")
>
> This error was found by the kernel.ci bot and so is still int today's
> tree.
Thanks. Did that tree include "mm: add dummy pmd_young() for
architectures not having it"?
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 21:24:57 -0800 Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 12:10:51 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the mm-hotfixes tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > mm/vmscan.c:4090:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘pmd_young’; did you mean ‘pte_young’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >
> > Caused by commit
> >
> > 3f85e711d5af ("mm: introduce arch_has_hw_nonleaf_pmd_young()")
> >
> > This error was found by the kernel.ci bot and so is still int today's
> > tree.
>
> Thanks. Did that tree include "mm: add dummy pmd_young() for
> architectures not having it"?
It did not when I merged the mm-hotfixes branch, but then I refetched
your trees during the day and so that patch appeared when I merged the
mm tree (which is now based on a later version of the mm-hotfixes
branch). So next-20221125 as a whole will not have the build failure.
After I merge all the "fixes" branches, I upload a "pending-updates"
branch that feeds into the various bots independently of the full next
tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell