2018-07-31 22:04:20

by Mark Salyzyn

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] HID: Bluetooth: hidp: buffer overflow in hidp_process_report

CVE-2018-9363

The buffer length is unsigned at all layers, but gets cast to int and
checked in hidp_process_report and can lead to a buffer overflow.
Switch len parameter to unsigned int to resolve issue.

This affects 3.18 and newer kernels.

Signed-off-by: Mark Salyzyn <[email protected]>
Fixes: a4b1b5877b514b276f0f31efe02388a9c2836728 ("HID: Bluetooth: hidp: make sure input buffers are big enough")
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]>
Cc: Johan Hedberg <[email protected]>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
---
net/bluetooth/hidp/core.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hidp/core.c b/net/bluetooth/hidp/core.c
index 1036e4fa1ea2..3bba8f4b08a9 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hidp/core.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hidp/core.c
@@ -431,8 +431,8 @@ static void hidp_del_timer(struct hidp_session *session)
del_timer(&session->timer);
}

-static void hidp_process_report(struct hidp_session *session,
- int type, const u8 *data, int len, int intr)
+static void hidp_process_report(struct hidp_session *session, int type,
+ const u8 *data, unsigned int len, int intr)
{
if (len > HID_MAX_BUFFER_SIZE)
len = HID_MAX_BUFFER_SIZE;
--
2.18.0.345.g5c9ce644c3-goog



2018-08-01 07:17:35

by Marcel Holtmann

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: Bluetooth: hidp: buffer overflow in hidp_process_report

Hi Mark,

> CVE-2018-9363
>
> The buffer length is unsigned at all layers, but gets cast to int and
> checked in hidp_process_report and can lead to a buffer overflow.
> Switch len parameter to unsigned int to resolve issue.
>
> This affects 3.18 and newer kernels.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Salyzyn <[email protected]>
> Fixes: a4b1b5877b514b276f0f31efe02388a9c2836728 ("HID: Bluetooth: hidp: make sure input buffers are big enough")
> Cc: Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]>
> Cc: Johan Hedberg <[email protected]>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
> Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
> Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> ---
> net/bluetooth/hidp/core.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

patch has been applied to bluetooth-next tree.

Regards

Marcel


2018-08-01 16:39:16

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: Bluetooth: hidp: buffer overflow in hidp_process_report

On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 03:02:13PM -0700, Mark Salyzyn wrote:
> CVE-2018-9363
>
> The buffer length is unsigned at all layers, but gets cast to int and
> checked in hidp_process_report and can lead to a buffer overflow.
> Switch len parameter to unsigned int to resolve issue.
>
> This affects 3.18 and newer kernels.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Salyzyn <[email protected]>
> Fixes: a4b1b5877b514b276f0f31efe02388a9c2836728 ("HID: Bluetooth: hidp: make sure input buffers are big enough")
> Cc: Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]>
> Cc: Johan Hedberg <[email protected]>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
> Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
> Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]

Nit, you only need to bother security@ if you do not have a fix and need
to figure out one.

Also, you forgot to cc: [email protected] to be included in older
kernel releases :(

thanks,

greg k-h

2018-08-01 16:42:09

by Mark Salyzyn

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: Bluetooth: hidp: buffer overflow in hidp_process_report

On 08/01/2018 09:37 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 03:02:13PM -0700, Mark Salyzyn wrote:
>> CVE-2018-9363
>>
>> The buffer length is unsigned at all layers, but gets cast to int and
>> checked in hidp_process_report and can lead to a buffer overflow.
>> Switch len parameter to unsigned int to resolve issue.
>>
>> This affects 3.18 and newer kernels.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Salyzyn <[email protected]>
>> Fixes: a4b1b5877b514b276f0f31efe02388a9c2836728 ("HID: Bluetooth: hidp: make sure input buffers are big enough")
>> Cc: Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Johan Hedberg <[email protected]>
>> Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <[email protected]>
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected]
> Nit, you only need to bother security@ if you do not have a fix and need
> to figure out one.

Thanks, I thought anything with a CVE was to go there according to
netdev FAQ (dropped security from response list).
> Also, you forgot to cc: [email protected] to be included in older
> kernel releases :(
netdev FAQ said to _not_ copy stable, I am so confused ;-{ (added stable
to response list b/c patch is now taken into bluetooth-next)
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h



2018-08-01 17:44:58

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: Bluetooth: hidp: buffer overflow in hidp_process_report

On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 09:41:04AM -0700, Mark Salyzyn wrote:
> On 08/01/2018 09:37 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 03:02:13PM -0700, Mark Salyzyn wrote:
> > > CVE-2018-9363
> > >
> > > The buffer length is unsigned at all layers, but gets cast to int and
> > > checked in hidp_process_report and can lead to a buffer overflow.
> > > Switch len parameter to unsigned int to resolve issue.
> > >
> > > This affects 3.18 and newer kernels.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mark Salyzyn <[email protected]>
> > > Fixes: a4b1b5877b514b276f0f31efe02388a9c2836728 ("HID: Bluetooth: hidp: make sure input buffers are big enough")
> > > Cc: Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Johan Hedberg <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > Cc: [email protected]
> > Nit, you only need to bother security@ if you do not have a fix and need
> > to figure out one.
>
> Thanks, I thought anything with a CVE was to go there according to netdev
> FAQ (dropped security from response list).
> > Also, you forgot to cc: [email protected] to be included in older
> > kernel releases :(
> netdev FAQ said to _not_ copy stable, I am so confused ;-{ (added stable to
> response list b/c patch is now taken into bluetooth-next)

Ah, well, bluetooth is a bit not normal here, usually stuff that ends up
in a subsystem tree before netdev needs to have a cc: stable on it for
me to catch it. Hopefully the bluetooth maintainers are on it :)

thanks,

greg k-h