Just wanted to give some long-term feedback on an old kernel... My primary
NFS/Samba/DHCP/mail server machine has been running 2.4.9-ac10 for 130 days
under moderate load with no problems whatsoever. Kudos to all developers.
Now I have to reboot the thing to add ext3 and software RAID; I'll be trying
2.4.17 with Andre's IDE patch and Rik's rmap...
Regards,
Dan
naptime@thunder:~$ uptime
8:20pm up 157 days, 6:51, 1 user, load average: 0.08, 0.08, 0.03
naptime@thunder:~$ uname -a
Linux thunder 2.4.9 #2 SMP Tue Aug 21 12:14:00 MST 2001 i686 unknown
naptime@thunder:~$
here is a slackware box, been running fine, doesn't look like the kernel
messed up anywhere for uptime.
j
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:linux-kernel-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Dan Maas
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 7:04 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: kudos - 2.4.9-ac10 @ 130 days
>
> Just wanted to give some long-term feedback on an old kernel... My
primary
> NFS/Samba/DHCP/mail server machine has been running 2.4.9-ac10 for 130
> days
> under moderate load with no problems whatsoever. Kudos to all
developers.
>
> Now I have to reboot the thing to add ext3 and software RAID; I'll be
> trying
> 2.4.17 with Andre's IDE patch and Rik's rmap...
>
> Regards,
> Dan
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/