Add a flag for cpufreq drivers to tell cpufreq core to auto-register
themselves as a thermal cooling device.
There series converts over all the drivers except arm_big_little.c.
Tested on SDM845 with the qcom-cpufreq-hw driver. Only compile-tested the
others.
Things needing fixing (but not a blocker for the series):
- Look at how to detect that we're not in IKS mode in arm_big_little's
.ready callback.
Changes since v2:
- Get rid of #ifdef'ery and let the pointer exist in all cases
- Get rid of (!CPU_THERMAL || THERMAL) dependency in all cpufreq drivers'
Kconfig
Changes since v1:
- Fix compilation failures with allmodconfig
- Get rid of #ifdef in cpufreq.c
- Removed miscellaneous patches and sent them separately
- Merged patches 1 and 2 from v1
Amit Kucheria (9):
thermal: cpu_cooling: Require thermal core to be compiled in
cpufreq: Auto-register the driver as a thermal cooling device if asked
cpufreq: qcom-hw: Register as a cpufreq cooling device
cpufreq: imx6q: Use auto-registration of thermal cooling device
cpufreq: cpufreq-dt: Use auto-registration of thermal cooling device
cpufreq: mediatek: Use auto-registration of thermal cooling device
cpufreq: qoriq: Use auto-registration of thermal cooling device
cpufreq: scmi: Use auto-registration of thermal cooling device
cpufreq: scpi: Use auto-registration of thermal cooling device
drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig | 3 ---
drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 5 -----
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 14 ++------------
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 ++++++
drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 24 ++----------------------
drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c | 14 ++------------
drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 3 ++-
drivers/cpufreq/qoriq-cpufreq.c | 15 ++-------------
drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 14 ++------------
drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c | 14 ++------------
drivers/thermal/Kconfig | 1 +
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
12 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
--
2.17.1
All cpufreq drivers do similar things to register as a cooling device.
Provide a cpufreq driver flag so drivers can just ask the cpufreq core
to register the cooling device on their behalf. This allows us to get
rid of duplicated code in the drivers.
In order to allow this, we add a struct thermal_cooling_device pointer
to struct cpufreq_policy so that drivers don't need to store it in a
private data structure.
Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <[email protected]>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 ++++++
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index e35a886e00bc..cf1be057caf4 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1318,6 +1318,9 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
if (cpufreq_driver->ready)
cpufreq_driver->ready(policy);
+ if (cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV)
+ register_cooling_device(policy);
+
pr_debug("initialization complete\n");
return 0;
@@ -1405,6 +1408,9 @@ static int cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu)
goto unlock;
}
+ if (cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV)
+ unregister_cooling_device(policy);
+
if (cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu)
cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu(policy);
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index bd7fbd6a4478..c7eb59b8ce94 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#include <linux/clk.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
+#include <linux/cpu_cooling.h>
#include <linux/completion.h>
#include <linux/kobject.h>
#include <linux/notifier.h>
@@ -151,6 +152,9 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
/* For cpufreq driver's internal use */
void *driver_data;
+
+ /* Pointer to the cooling device if used for thermal mitigation */
+ struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
};
/* Only for ACPI */
@@ -386,6 +390,12 @@ struct cpufreq_driver {
*/
#define CPUFREQ_NO_AUTO_DYNAMIC_SWITCHING BIT(6)
+/*
+ * Set by drivers that want the core to automatically register the cpufreq
+ * driver as a thermal cooling device.
+ */
+#define CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV BIT(7)
+
int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data);
int cpufreq_unregister_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data);
@@ -415,6 +425,17 @@ cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
}
+static inline void register_cooling_device(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+ policy->cdev = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
+}
+
+static inline void unregister_cooling_device(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+ cpufreq_cooling_unregister(policy->cdev);
+ policy->cdev = NULL;
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
void cpufreq_suspend(void);
void cpufreq_resume(void);
--
2.17.1
Add the CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV flag to allow the cpufreq core
to auto-register the driver as a cooling device.
Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
---
drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
index d83939a1b3d4..ed32849a3d40 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
@@ -231,7 +231,8 @@ static struct freq_attr *qcom_cpufreq_hw_attr[] = {
static struct cpufreq_driver cpufreq_qcom_hw_driver = {
.flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY | CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK |
- CPUFREQ_HAVE_GOVERNOR_PER_POLICY,
+ CPUFREQ_HAVE_GOVERNOR_PER_POLICY |
+ CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV,
.verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
.target_index = qcom_cpufreq_hw_target_index,
.get = qcom_cpufreq_hw_get,
--
2.17.1
Use the CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV flag to allow cpufreq core to
automatically register as a thermal cooling device.
This allows removal of boiler plate code from the driver.
Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <[email protected]>
---
drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c | 14 ++------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
index eb8920d39818..9a937f4c63e7 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
#include <linux/clk.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
-#include <linux/cpu_cooling.h>
#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
@@ -48,7 +47,6 @@ struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info {
struct regulator *sram_reg;
struct clk *cpu_clk;
struct clk *inter_clk;
- struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
struct list_head list_head;
int intermediate_voltage;
bool need_voltage_tracking;
@@ -307,13 +305,6 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
#define DYNAMIC_POWER "dynamic-power-coefficient"
-static void mtk_cpufreq_ready(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
-{
- struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info = policy->driver_data;
-
- info->cdev = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
-}
-
static int mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_init(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info, int cpu)
{
struct device *cpu_dev;
@@ -472,7 +463,6 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info = policy->driver_data;
- cpufreq_cooling_unregister(info->cdev);
dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table(info->cpu_dev, &policy->freq_table);
return 0;
@@ -480,13 +470,13 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
static struct cpufreq_driver mtk_cpufreq_driver = {
.flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY | CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK |
- CPUFREQ_HAVE_GOVERNOR_PER_POLICY,
+ CPUFREQ_HAVE_GOVERNOR_PER_POLICY |
+ CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV,
.verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
.target_index = mtk_cpufreq_set_target,
.get = cpufreq_generic_get,
.init = mtk_cpufreq_init,
.exit = mtk_cpufreq_exit,
- .ready = mtk_cpufreq_ready,
.name = "mtk-cpufreq",
.attr = cpufreq_generic_attr,
};
--
2.17.1
The CPU cooling driver (cpu_cooling.c) allows the platform's cpufreq
driver to register as a cooling device and cool down the platform by
throttling the CPU frequency. In order to be able to auto-register a
cpufreq driver as a cooling device from the cpufreq core, we need access
to code inside cpu_cooling.c which, in turn, accesses code inside
thermal core.
CPU_FREQ is a bool while THERMAL is tristate. In some configurations
(e.g. allmodconfig), CONFIG_THERMAL ends up as a module while
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ is compiled in. This leads to following error:
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.o: In function `cpufreq_offline':
cpufreq.c:(.text+0x407c): undefined reference to `cpufreq_cooling_unregister'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.o: In function `cpufreq_online':
cpufreq.c:(.text+0x70c0): undefined reference to `of_cpufreq_cooling_register'
Given that platforms using CPU_THERMAL usually want it compiled-in so it
is available early in boot, make CPU_THERMAL depend on THERMAL being
compiled-in instead of allowing it to be a module.
As a result of this change, get rid of the ugly (!CPU_THERMAL ||
THERMAL) dependency in all cpufreq drivers using CPU_THERMAL.
Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <[email protected]>
---
drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig | 3 ---
drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 5 -----
drivers/thermal/Kconfig | 1 +
3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
index 608af20a3494..b22e6bba71f1 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
@@ -207,8 +207,6 @@ comment "CPU frequency scaling drivers"
config CPUFREQ_DT
tristate "Generic DT based cpufreq driver"
depends on HAVE_CLK && OF
- # if CPU_THERMAL is on and THERMAL=m, CPUFREQ_DT cannot be =y:
- depends on !CPU_THERMAL || THERMAL
select CPUFREQ_DT_PLATDEV
select PM_OPP
help
@@ -327,7 +325,6 @@ endif
config QORIQ_CPUFREQ
tristate "CPU frequency scaling driver for Freescale QorIQ SoCs"
depends on OF && COMMON_CLK && (PPC_E500MC || ARM || ARM64)
- depends on !CPU_THERMAL || THERMAL
select CLK_QORIQ
help
This adds the CPUFreq driver support for Freescale QorIQ SoCs
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
index 688f10227793..ca8567c3152c 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
@@ -29,8 +29,6 @@ config ARM_ARMADA_37XX_CPUFREQ
config ARM_BIG_LITTLE_CPUFREQ
tristate "Generic ARM big LITTLE CPUfreq driver"
depends on ARM_CPU_TOPOLOGY && HAVE_CLK
- # if CPU_THERMAL is on and THERMAL=m, ARM_BIT_LITTLE_CPUFREQ cannot be =y
- depends on !CPU_THERMAL || THERMAL
select PM_OPP
help
This enables the Generic CPUfreq driver for ARM big.LITTLE platforms.
@@ -38,7 +36,6 @@ config ARM_BIG_LITTLE_CPUFREQ
config ARM_SCPI_CPUFREQ
tristate "SCPI based CPUfreq driver"
depends on ARM_SCPI_PROTOCOL && COMMON_CLK_SCPI
- depends on !CPU_THERMAL || THERMAL
help
This adds the CPUfreq driver support for ARM platforms using SCPI
protocol for CPU power management.
@@ -93,7 +90,6 @@ config ARM_KIRKWOOD_CPUFREQ
config ARM_MEDIATEK_CPUFREQ
tristate "CPU Frequency scaling support for MediaTek SoCs"
depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK && REGULATOR
- depends on !CPU_THERMAL || THERMAL
select PM_OPP
help
This adds the CPUFreq driver support for MediaTek SoCs.
@@ -233,7 +229,6 @@ config ARM_SA1110_CPUFREQ
config ARM_SCMI_CPUFREQ
tristate "SCMI based CPUfreq driver"
depends on ARM_SCMI_PROTOCOL || COMPILE_TEST
- depends on !CPU_THERMAL || THERMAL
select PM_OPP
help
This adds the CPUfreq driver support for ARM platforms using SCMI
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
index 30323426902e..58bb7d72dc2b 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
@@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ config CPU_THERMAL
bool "generic cpu cooling support"
depends on CPU_FREQ
depends on THERMAL_OF
+ depends on THERMAL=y
help
This implements the generic cpu cooling mechanism through frequency
reduction. An ACPI version of this already exists
--
2.17.1
Use the CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV flag to allow cpufreq core to
automatically register as a thermal cooling device.
This allows removal of boiler plate code from the driver.
Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <[email protected]>
---
drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 24 ++----------------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
index 9fedf627e000..9935df234fa1 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
#include <linux/clk.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
-#include <linux/cpu_cooling.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/nvmem-consumer.h>
@@ -52,7 +51,6 @@ static struct clk_bulk_data clks[] = {
};
static struct device *cpu_dev;
-static struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
static bool free_opp;
static struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table;
static unsigned int max_freq;
@@ -193,16 +191,6 @@ static int imx6q_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
return 0;
}
-static void imx6q_cpufreq_ready(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
-{
- cdev = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
-
- if (!cdev)
- dev_err(cpu_dev,
- "running cpufreq without cooling device: %ld\n",
- PTR_ERR(cdev));
-}
-
static int imx6q_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
int ret;
@@ -214,22 +202,14 @@ static int imx6q_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
return ret;
}
-static int imx6q_cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
-{
- cpufreq_cooling_unregister(cdev);
-
- return 0;
-}
-
static struct cpufreq_driver imx6q_cpufreq_driver = {
- .flags = CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK,
+ .flags = CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK |
+ CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV,
.verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
.target_index = imx6q_set_target,
.get = cpufreq_generic_get,
.init = imx6q_cpufreq_init,
- .exit = imx6q_cpufreq_exit,
.name = "imx6q-cpufreq",
- .ready = imx6q_cpufreq_ready,
.attr = cpufreq_generic_attr,
.suspend = cpufreq_generic_suspend,
};
--
2.17.1
Use the CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV flag to allow cpufreq core to
automatically register as a thermal cooling device.
This allows removal of boiler plate code from the driver.
Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <[email protected]>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 14 ++------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
index e58bfcb1169e..2a4c4ea7980b 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
#include <linux/clk.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
-#include <linux/cpu_cooling.h>
#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
@@ -30,7 +29,6 @@
struct private_data {
struct opp_table *opp_table;
struct device *cpu_dev;
- struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
const char *reg_name;
bool have_static_opps;
};
@@ -301,7 +299,6 @@ static int cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
struct private_data *priv = policy->driver_data;
- cpufreq_cooling_unregister(priv->cdev);
dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table(priv->cpu_dev, &policy->freq_table);
if (priv->have_static_opps)
dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table(policy->related_cpus);
@@ -314,21 +311,14 @@ static int cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
return 0;
}
-static void cpufreq_ready(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
-{
- struct private_data *priv = policy->driver_data;
-
- priv->cdev = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
-}
-
static struct cpufreq_driver dt_cpufreq_driver = {
- .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY | CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK,
+ .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY | CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK |
+ CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV,
.verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
.target_index = set_target,
.get = cpufreq_generic_get,
.init = cpufreq_init,
.exit = cpufreq_exit,
- .ready = cpufreq_ready,
.name = "cpufreq-dt",
.attr = cpufreq_dt_attr,
.suspend = cpufreq_generic_suspend,
--
2.17.1
Use the CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV flag to allow cpufreq core to
automatically register as a thermal cooling device.
This allows removal of boiler plate code from the driver.
Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <[email protected]>
---
drivers/cpufreq/qoriq-cpufreq.c | 15 ++-------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qoriq-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qoriq-cpufreq.c
index 3d773f64b4df..b206e6cb55f0 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/qoriq-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qoriq-cpufreq.c
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
#include <linux/clk.h>
#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
-#include <linux/cpu_cooling.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
@@ -31,7 +30,6 @@
struct cpu_data {
struct clk **pclk;
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table;
- struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
};
/*
@@ -239,7 +237,6 @@ static int qoriq_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
struct cpu_data *data = policy->driver_data;
- cpufreq_cooling_unregister(data->cdev);
kfree(data->pclk);
kfree(data->table);
kfree(data);
@@ -258,23 +255,15 @@ static int qoriq_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
return clk_set_parent(policy->clk, parent);
}
-
-static void qoriq_cpufreq_ready(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
-{
- struct cpu_data *cpud = policy->driver_data;
-
- cpud->cdev = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
-}
-
static struct cpufreq_driver qoriq_cpufreq_driver = {
.name = "qoriq_cpufreq",
- .flags = CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS,
+ .flags = CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS |
+ CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV,
.init = qoriq_cpufreq_cpu_init,
.exit = qoriq_cpufreq_cpu_exit,
.verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
.target_index = qoriq_cpufreq_target,
.get = cpufreq_generic_get,
- .ready = qoriq_cpufreq_ready,
.attr = cpufreq_generic_attr,
};
--
2.17.1
Use the CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV flag to allow cpufreq core to
automatically register as a thermal cooling device.
This allows removal of boiler plate code from the driver.
Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <[email protected]>
---
drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c | 14 ++------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
index 99449738faa4..82420e8e5f0d 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@
#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
-#include <linux/cpu_cooling.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
@@ -34,7 +33,6 @@
struct scpi_data {
struct clk *clk;
struct device *cpu_dev;
- struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
};
static struct scpi_ops *scpi_ops;
@@ -186,7 +184,6 @@ static int scpi_cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
struct scpi_data *priv = policy->driver_data;
- cpufreq_cooling_unregister(priv->cdev);
clk_put(priv->clk);
dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table(priv->cpu_dev, &policy->freq_table);
kfree(priv);
@@ -195,23 +192,16 @@ static int scpi_cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
return 0;
}
-static void scpi_cpufreq_ready(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
-{
- struct scpi_data *priv = policy->driver_data;
-
- priv->cdev = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
-}
-
static struct cpufreq_driver scpi_cpufreq_driver = {
.name = "scpi-cpufreq",
.flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY | CPUFREQ_HAVE_GOVERNOR_PER_POLICY |
- CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK,
+ CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK |
+ CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV,
.verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
.attr = cpufreq_generic_attr,
.get = scpi_cpufreq_get_rate,
.init = scpi_cpufreq_init,
.exit = scpi_cpufreq_exit,
- .ready = scpi_cpufreq_ready,
.target_index = scpi_cpufreq_set_target,
};
--
2.17.1
Use the CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV flag to allow cpufreq core to
automatically register as a thermal cooling device.
This allows removal of boiler plate code from the driver.
Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <[email protected]>
---
drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 14 ++------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
index 242c3370544e..b19e9d129f8f 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
@@ -11,7 +11,6 @@
#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
-#include <linux/cpu_cooling.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/pm_opp.h>
@@ -22,7 +21,6 @@
struct scmi_data {
int domain_id;
struct device *cpu_dev;
- struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
};
static const struct scmi_handle *handle;
@@ -185,7 +183,6 @@ static int scmi_cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
struct scmi_data *priv = policy->driver_data;
- cpufreq_cooling_unregister(priv->cdev);
dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table(priv->cpu_dev, &policy->freq_table);
kfree(priv);
dev_pm_opp_remove_all_dynamic(priv->cpu_dev);
@@ -193,17 +190,11 @@ static int scmi_cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
return 0;
}
-static void scmi_cpufreq_ready(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
-{
- struct scmi_data *priv = policy->driver_data;
-
- priv->cdev = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
-}
-
static struct cpufreq_driver scmi_cpufreq_driver = {
.name = "scmi",
.flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY | CPUFREQ_HAVE_GOVERNOR_PER_POLICY |
- CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK,
+ CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK |
+ CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV,
.verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
.attr = cpufreq_generic_attr,
.target_index = scmi_cpufreq_set_target,
@@ -211,7 +202,6 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver scmi_cpufreq_driver = {
.get = scmi_cpufreq_get_rate,
.init = scmi_cpufreq_init,
.exit = scmi_cpufreq_exit,
- .ready = scmi_cpufreq_ready,
};
static int scmi_cpufreq_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
--
2.17.1
On 25-01-19, 12:32, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> All cpufreq drivers do similar things to register as a cooling device.
> Provide a cpufreq driver flag so drivers can just ask the cpufreq core
> to register the cooling device on their behalf. This allows us to get
> rid of duplicated code in the drivers.
>
> In order to allow this, we add a struct thermal_cooling_device pointer
> to struct cpufreq_policy so that drivers don't need to store it in a
> private data structure.
>
> Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
> Suggested-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <[email protected]>
> Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 ++++++
> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index e35a886e00bc..cf1be057caf4 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1318,6 +1318,9 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
> if (cpufreq_driver->ready)
> cpufreq_driver->ready(policy);
>
> + if (cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV)
> + register_cooling_device(policy);
> +
> pr_debug("initialization complete\n");
>
> return 0;
> @@ -1405,6 +1408,9 @@ static int cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu)
> goto unlock;
> }
>
> + if (cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV)
> + unregister_cooling_device(policy);
> +
> if (cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu)
> cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu(policy);
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index bd7fbd6a4478..c7eb59b8ce94 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> +#include <linux/cpu_cooling.h>
> #include <linux/completion.h>
> #include <linux/kobject.h>
> #include <linux/notifier.h>
> @@ -151,6 +152,9 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
>
> /* For cpufreq driver's internal use */
> void *driver_data;
> +
> + /* Pointer to the cooling device if used for thermal mitigation */
> + struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
> };
>
> /* Only for ACPI */
> @@ -386,6 +390,12 @@ struct cpufreq_driver {
> */
> #define CPUFREQ_NO_AUTO_DYNAMIC_SWITCHING BIT(6)
>
> +/*
> + * Set by drivers that want the core to automatically register the cpufreq
> + * driver as a thermal cooling device.
> + */
> +#define CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV BIT(7)
> +
> int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data);
> int cpufreq_unregister_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data);
>
> @@ -415,6 +425,17 @@ cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
> }
>
> +static inline void register_cooling_device(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +{
> + policy->cdev = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void unregister_cooling_device(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +{
> + cpufreq_cooling_unregister(policy->cdev);
> + policy->cdev = NULL;
> +}
I thought that we discussed over chat that you wouldn't add any
wrapper routines. How do you see these getting used ? I will suggest
that this should be open coded in the core itself.
--
viresh
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 11:32 AM Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 25-01-19, 12:32, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> > All cpufreq drivers do similar things to register as a cooling device.
> > Provide a cpufreq driver flag so drivers can just ask the cpufreq core
> > to register the cooling device on their behalf. This allows us to get
> > rid of duplicated code in the drivers.
> >
> > In order to allow this, we add a struct thermal_cooling_device pointer
> > to struct cpufreq_policy so that drivers don't need to store it in a
> > private data structure.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
> > Suggested-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <[email protected]>
> > Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 ++++++
> > include/linux/cpufreq.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > index e35a886e00bc..cf1be057caf4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > @@ -1318,6 +1318,9 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
> > if (cpufreq_driver->ready)
> > cpufreq_driver->ready(policy);
> >
> > + if (cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV)
> > + register_cooling_device(policy);
> > +
> > pr_debug("initialization complete\n");
> >
> > return 0;
> > @@ -1405,6 +1408,9 @@ static int cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu)
> > goto unlock;
> > }
> >
> > + if (cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV)
> > + unregister_cooling_device(policy);
> > +
> > if (cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu)
> > cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu(policy);
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > index bd7fbd6a4478..c7eb59b8ce94 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> >
> > #include <linux/clk.h>
> > #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> > +#include <linux/cpu_cooling.h>
> > #include <linux/completion.h>
> > #include <linux/kobject.h>
> > #include <linux/notifier.h>
> > @@ -151,6 +152,9 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
> >
> > /* For cpufreq driver's internal use */
> > void *driver_data;
> > +
> > + /* Pointer to the cooling device if used for thermal mitigation */
> > + struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
> > };
> >
> > /* Only for ACPI */
> > @@ -386,6 +390,12 @@ struct cpufreq_driver {
> > */
> > #define CPUFREQ_NO_AUTO_DYNAMIC_SWITCHING BIT(6)
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Set by drivers that want the core to automatically register the cpufreq
> > + * driver as a thermal cooling device.
> > + */
> > +#define CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV BIT(7)
> > +
> > int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data);
> > int cpufreq_unregister_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data);
> >
> > @@ -415,6 +425,17 @@ cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
> > }
> >
> > +static inline void register_cooling_device(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > +{
> > + policy->cdev = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void unregister_cooling_device(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > +{
> > + cpufreq_cooling_unregister(policy->cdev);
> > + policy->cdev = NULL;
> > +}
>
> I thought that we discussed over chat that you wouldn't add any
> wrapper routines. How do you see these getting used ? I will suggest
> that this should be open coded in the core itself.
Agreed.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 4:01 PM Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 25-01-19, 12:32, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> > All cpufreq drivers do similar things to register as a cooling device.
> > Provide a cpufreq driver flag so drivers can just ask the cpufreq core
> > to register the cooling device on their behalf. This allows us to get
> > rid of duplicated code in the drivers.
> >
> > In order to allow this, we add a struct thermal_cooling_device pointer
> > to struct cpufreq_policy so that drivers don't need to store it in a
> > private data structure.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
> > Suggested-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <[email protected]>
> > Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 ++++++
> > include/linux/cpufreq.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > index e35a886e00bc..cf1be057caf4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > @@ -1318,6 +1318,9 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
> > if (cpufreq_driver->ready)
> > cpufreq_driver->ready(policy);
> >
> > + if (cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV)
> > + register_cooling_device(policy);
> > +
> > pr_debug("initialization complete\n");
> >
> > return 0;
> > @@ -1405,6 +1408,9 @@ static int cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu)
> > goto unlock;
> > }
> >
> > + if (cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV)
> > + unregister_cooling_device(policy);
> > +
> > if (cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu)
> > cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu(policy);
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > index bd7fbd6a4478..c7eb59b8ce94 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> >
> > #include <linux/clk.h>
> > #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> > +#include <linux/cpu_cooling.h>
> > #include <linux/completion.h>
> > #include <linux/kobject.h>
> > #include <linux/notifier.h>
> > @@ -151,6 +152,9 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
> >
> > /* For cpufreq driver's internal use */
> > void *driver_data;
> > +
> > + /* Pointer to the cooling device if used for thermal mitigation */
> > + struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
> > };
> >
> > /* Only for ACPI */
> > @@ -386,6 +390,12 @@ struct cpufreq_driver {
> > */
> > #define CPUFREQ_NO_AUTO_DYNAMIC_SWITCHING BIT(6)
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Set by drivers that want the core to automatically register the cpufreq
> > + * driver as a thermal cooling device.
> > + */
> > +#define CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV BIT(7)
> > +
> > int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data);
> > int cpufreq_unregister_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data);
> >
> > @@ -415,6 +425,17 @@ cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
> > }
> >
> > +static inline void register_cooling_device(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > +{
> > + policy->cdev = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void unregister_cooling_device(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > +{
> > + cpufreq_cooling_unregister(policy->cdev);
> > + policy->cdev = NULL;
> > +}
>
> I thought that we discussed over chat that you wouldn't add any
> wrapper routines. How do you see these getting used ? I will suggest
> that this should be open coded in the core itself.
Aah, I understood your earlier comment and the chat to mean that we
could get rid of the #ifdefs. I didn't catch on to the fact you wanted
to get rid of the wrapper routines itself. My bad.
Will respin.
Regards,
Amit