subject says it all....
I remember there was a discussion and a patch floating around that
implemented SYSCALL/SYSRET, just want to know what happened to it....
TJ
--
_________________________________________________________________________
Terje Eggestad [email protected]
Scali Scalable Linux Systems http://www.scali.com
Olaf Helsets Vei 6 tel: +47 22 62 89 61 (OFFICE)
P.O.Box 70 Bogerud +47 975 31 574 (MOBILE)
N-0621 Oslo fax: +47 22 62 89 51
NORWAY
_________________________________________________________________________
On Mon 19-11-01 16:38:45, Terje Eggestad wrote:
> subject says it all....
>
> I remember there was a discussion and a patch floating around that
> implemented SYSCALL/SYSRET, just want to know what happened to it....
discarded
--
<sig in construction>
ons, 2001-11-21 kl. 22:54 skrev Pavel Machek:
>
> On Mon 19-11-01 16:38:45, Terje Eggestad wrote:
> > subject says it all....
> >
> > I remember there was a discussion and a patch floating around that
> > implemented SYSCALL/SYSRET, just want to know what happened to it....
>
> discarded
Because there was no perf benefit or because the patch was in poor
quality?
>
> --
> <sig in construction>
--
_________________________________________________________________________
Terje Eggestad [email protected]
Scali Scalable Linux Systems http://www.scali.com
Olaf Helsets Vei 6 tel: +47 22 62 89 61 (OFFICE)
P.O.Box 70 Bogerud +47 975 31 574 (MOBILE)
N-0621 Oslo fax: +47 22 62 89 51
NORWAY
_________________________________________________________________________
On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 02:54:02PM +0100, Terje Eggestad wrote:
> Cool,
>
> do you happen top know where the patch is? On e that I can apply to
> stock 2.4.1x??
x86-64 is on ftp.x86-64.org
If you mean SYSENTER/SYSEXIT IIRC there were two indepdent patches for that
from Manfred Spraul and from Ingo Molnar. You have to ask them if they kept
any of them uptodate.
-Andi