Does anyone have a working NAPI kernel and tulip driver patch against
2.4.18 or so? I will be happy to test this if so.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <[email protected]> <Ben_Greear AT excite.com>
President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear
[email protected] said:
> Does anyone have a working NAPI kernel and tulip driver patch against
> 2.4.18 or so? I will be happy to test this if so.
Yes, I backported the core last week to 2.4.19-rc1 from 2.5.24, but the
patch ought to apply to 2.4.18 with only offset mismatches. I kept a lot
of style cleanups in the patch, but they should be easy to remove if
they cause problems. I'll be backporting the various napified drivers to
2.4 this week.
http://orr.falooley.org/pub/linux/net/
Jason
On Sun, 2002-07-07 at 21:15, Jason Lunz wrote:
>
> [email protected] said:
> > Does anyone have a working NAPI kernel and tulip driver patch against
> > 2.4.18 or so? I will be happy to test this if so.
>
> Yes, I backported the core last week to 2.4.19-rc1 from 2.5.24, but the
> patch ought to apply to 2.4.18 with only offset mismatches. I kept a lot
> of style cleanups in the patch, but they should be easy to remove if
> they cause problems. I'll be backporting the various napified drivers to
> 2.4 this week.
>
> http://orr.falooley.org/pub/linux/net/
Why not use the original patch?
ftp://robur.slu.se/pub/Linux/net-development/NAPI/
--
/Martin
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat
you with experience.
Martin Josefsson wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-07-07 at 21:15, Jason Lunz wrote:
>
>>[email protected] said:
>>
>>>Does anyone have a working NAPI kernel and tulip driver patch against
>>>2.4.18 or so? I will be happy to test this if so.
>>
>>Yes, I backported the core last week to 2.4.19-rc1 from 2.5.24, but the
>>patch ought to apply to 2.4.18 with only offset mismatches. I kept a lot
>>of style cleanups in the patch, but they should be easy to remove if
>>they cause problems. I'll be backporting the various napified drivers to
>>2.4 this week.
>>
>>http://orr.falooley.org/pub/linux/net/
>
>
> Why not use the original patch?
>
> ftp://robur.slu.se/pub/Linux/net-development/NAPI/
The only patches I found there were about 6 months old, and the tulip
patch seems to be based on the tulip driver in 2.4.2. The tulip driver
did not reach stability in the 2.4 series untill about 2.4.9, when it
finally started auto-negotiating correctly.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <[email protected]> <Ben_Greear AT excite.com>
President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear