Hi,
This patch removes the device name field which is no longer present.
--- linux-2.6.0-test4/drivers/net/3c509.c 2003-08-23 13:14:30.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.0-test4-nvk/drivers/net/3c509.c 2003-08-23 18:34:35.000000000 +0530
@@ -629,8 +629,6 @@
el3_mca_adapter_names[mdev->index], slot + 1);
/* claim the slot */
- strncpy(device->name, el3_mca_adapter_names[mdev->index],
- sizeof(device->name));
mca_device_set_claim(mdev, 1);
if_port = pos4 & 0x03;
On 23 Aug 2003 18:43:29 +0530
Vinay K Nallamothu <[email protected]> wrote:
> This patch removes the device name field which is no longer present.
This doesn't look like the right fix. You can't just
delete these lines, you should rather replace them with
accesses to whatever the MCA device struct name field is.
Hi Dave,
On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 16:17, David S. Miller wrote:
> On 23 Aug 2003 18:43:29 +0530
> Vinay K Nallamothu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > This patch removes the device name field which is no longer present.
>
> This doesn't look like the right fix. You can't just
> delete these lines, you should rather replace them with
> accesses to whatever the MCA device struct name field is.
>
>
Pls find the updated patch (hopefully right this time) below:
Thanks
vinay
--- linux-2.6.0-test4/drivers/net/3c509.c 2003-08-23 13:14:30.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.0-test4-nvk/drivers/net/3c509.c 2003-08-24 17:51:19.000000000 +0530
@@ -629,8 +629,8 @@
el3_mca_adapter_names[mdev->index], slot + 1);
/* claim the slot */
- strncpy(device->name, el3_mca_adapter_names[mdev->index],
- sizeof(device->name));
+ strncpy(mdev->name, el3_mca_adapter_names[mdev->index],
+ sizeof(mdev->name));
mca_device_set_claim(mdev, 1);
if_port = pos4 & 0x03;
On 24 Aug 2003 17:55:40 +0530
Vinay K Nallamothu <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 16:17, David S. Miller wrote:
> > On 23 Aug 2003 18:43:29 +0530
> > Vinay K Nallamothu <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > This patch removes the device name field which is no longer present.
> >
> > This doesn't look like the right fix. You can't just
> > delete these lines, you should rather replace them with
> > accesses to whatever the MCA device struct name field is.
> >
> >
> Pls find the updated patch (hopefully right this time) below:
Applied, thanks.