Since test4-bk2 I've still had increasing problems with the
airo/airo_cs driver... test4-bk2 operates but generates an awful lot of
frame errors... I've tried test5-bk1 , bk3 and bk5 and they fail to even
be able to associate with the AP at all and totally unusable... As soon
as the driver and/or card are removed it causes an oops unlike earlier
test versions which would just lock the whole machine up...
Has anyone else been noticing these problems with a Cisco Aironet 350?
I've got it in a Sony Vaio PCG-C1MWP and use it on two networks which
use either a LinkSys WAP11 or an Orinoco AP-1000 with the same
results...
Regards,
Jeremy
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 13:00, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
> Since test4-bk2 I've still had increasing problems with the
> airo/airo_cs driver... test4-bk2 operates but generates an awful lot of
> frame errors... I've tried test5-bk1 , bk3 and bk5 and they fail to even
> be able to associate with the AP at all and totally unusable... As soon
> as the driver and/or card are removed it causes an oops unlike earlier
> test versions which would just lock the whole machine up...
i have a cisco 340 in my thinkpad t21 that has been fine so far
(especially after Rusty fixed the detection problems)
>
> Has anyone else been noticing these problems with a Cisco Aironet 350?
> I've got it in a Sony Vaio PCG-C1MWP and use it on two networks which
> use either a LinkSys WAP11 or an Orinoco AP-1000 with the same
> results...
>
> Regards,
> Jeremy
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 03:01:41AM +1000, Sven Dowideit wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 13:00, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
> > Since test4-bk2 I've still had increasing problems with the
> > airo/airo_cs driver... test4-bk2 operates but generates an awful lot of
> > frame errors... I've tried test5-bk1 , bk3 and bk5 and they fail to even
> > be able to associate with the AP at all and totally unusable... As soon
> > as the driver and/or card are removed it causes an oops unlike earlier
> > test versions which would just lock the whole machine up...
> i have a cisco 340 in my thinkpad t21 that has been fine so far
> (especially after Rusty fixed the detection problems)
Hmm... with test4-bk2 I have on the average twice as many frame errors
as I do packets being sent it seems... The test5-bk[135] I've tried
won't even associate with the APs... I would think it was a problem with
the AP but it's two different AP units (brands and models) as well it
worked fine with the older 2.4.20 kernel...
> >
> > Has anyone else been noticing these problems with a Cisco Aironet 350?
> > I've got it in a Sony Vaio PCG-C1MWP and use it on two networks which
> > use either a LinkSys WAP11 or an Orinoco AP-1000 with the same
> > results...
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jeremy
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/