I read somewhere that (all) syscalls (as in the method of calling them)
are being obsoleted, unfortunately this makes for a rather poor search
term.
Thus the question: is this true and with what is this being replaced?
[just a link would be sufficient]
Thanks,
MaZe.
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 12:39:16PM +0100, Maciej Zenczykowski wrote:
> I read somewhere that (all) syscalls (as in the method of calling them)
> are being obsoleted, unfortunately this makes for a rather poor search
> term.
> Thus the question: is this true and with what is this being replaced?
> [just a link would be sufficient]
Your source may be mixed up with sysenter, try googling on that.
Or: http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/531/1996
Good luck!
>
> Thanks,
> MaZe.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software
http://lartc.org Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 12:39:16PM +0100, Maciej Zenczykowski wrote:
> > I read somewhere that (all) syscalls (as in the method of calling them)
> > are being obsoleted, unfortunately this makes for a rather poor search
> > term.
> > Thus the question: is this true and with what is this being replaced?
> > [just a link would be sufficient]
I think that he meant this phrase in post-halloween-2.5.txt:
#v+
- Calling syscalls by numeric values is deprecated, and will go away
in the next development series.
#v-
What is new way of calling syscalls?
--
Tomasz Torcz Only gods can safely risk perfection,
[email protected] it's a dangerous thing for a man. -- Alia
|> Playing: stream4.jungletrain.net:8000 ...
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 08:21:13PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> I think that he meant this phrase in post-halloween-2.5.txt:
> #v+
> - Calling syscalls by numeric values is deprecated, and will go away
> in the next development series.
> #v-
>
> What is new way of calling syscalls?
I think this should be sysctls.
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software
http://lartc.org Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 14:21, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> I think that he meant this phrase in post-halloween-2.5.txt:
> #v+
> - Calling syscalls by numeric values is deprecated, and will go away
> in the next development series.
> #v-
>
> What is new way of calling syscalls?
I think Dave means "sysctl" here, not syscalls.
Dave, this probably needs changing in the post-halloween-2.5.txt
document.
Robert Love
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 07:24:59PM -0500, Robert Love wrote:
> > I think that he meant this phrase in post-halloween-2.5.txt:
> > #v+
> > - Calling syscalls by numeric values is deprecated, and will go away
> > in the next development series.
> > #v-
> >
> > What is new way of calling syscalls?
>
> I think Dave means "sysctl" here, not syscalls.
I did.
> Dave, this probably needs changing in the post-halloween-2.5.txt
> document.
I did.
Yet again, that amusing case appears where a thinko has been there
for months without anyone noticing, and once I've fixed it everyone
and his dog spots it 8-)
Dave