"MILLIONS OF LINES OF UNIX® CODE" DISCOVERED BY "MIT MATHEMATICIANS"
P: Darl McBride
W: http://www.sco.com/
W: http://www.thescogroup.com/
S: The Dark Matter Theory of Linux which explains why the kernel
tarball is so much larger than can be reasonably expected and is
ever-expanding. Even legal discovery seeking the code "with
specificity" cannot find these millions of lines without the
closest judicial assistance.
W: http://www.novell.com/ -- it's our UNIX®, we didn't sell it to
Caldera when we sold them... well
not much really.
W: http://www.berkeley.edu/ -- it's mostly our Unix in UNIX®.
W: http://www.opengroup.org/ -- it's our ® in UNIX®.
W: http://www.sgi.com/ -- our search finds no Darl^H^H Dark Matter
in Linux.
W: http://www.legal.ibm.com/ -- "we spell Linux 'LINUX®'".
W: http://www.eng.ibm.com/ -- "we would like to spell Linux 'LNX' bt
Lns Trvlds hs trd mrk".
--
gdt/2004-04-01
Glen Turner wrote:
>
> "MILLIONS OF LINES OF UNIX? CODE" DISCOVERED BY "MIT MATHEMATICIANS"
> P: Darl McBride
> W: http://www.sco.com/
> W: http://www.thescogroup.com/
> S: The Dark Matter Theory of Linux which explains why the kernel
> tarball is so much larger than can be reasonably expected and is
> ever-expanding. Even legal discovery seeking the code "with
> specificity" cannot find these millions of lines without the
> closest judicial assistance.
> W: http://www.novell.com/ -- it's our UNIX?, we didn't sell it to
> Caldera when we sold them... well
> not much really.
> W: http://www.berkeley.edu/ -- it's mostly our Unix in UNIX?.
> W: http://www.opengroup.org/ -- it's our ? in UNIX?.
> W: http://www.sgi.com/ -- our search finds no Darl^H^H Dark Matter
> in Linux.
> W: http://www.legal.ibm.com/ -- "we spell Linux 'LINUX?'".
> W: http://www.eng.ibm.com/ -- "we would like to spell Linux 'LNX' bt
> Lns Trvlds hs trd mrk".
ROTFL.
--
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
Can't you see
It all makes perfect sense
Expressed in dollar and cents
Pounds shillings and pence
(Roger Waters)