2006-03-31 16:29:12

by Alejandro Bonilla

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: snd_hda_intel on 2.6.16

Hi,

I read about a problem with snd_hda_intel latelly on 2.6.16. I was not having
this on 2.6.15-19 but looks like it is "chip-monking"

I use linux2.6 git and it is still present. Just wanted to let you'll know
about it.

Should anyone need any info, please let me know.

.Alejandro


2006-03-31 16:41:06

by Lee Revell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: snd_hda_intel on 2.6.16

On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 10:29 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I read about a problem with snd_hda_intel latelly on 2.6.16. I was not having
> this on 2.6.15-19 but looks like it is "chip-monking"
>

Too cryptic. What exactly is the problem?

> I use linux2.6 git and it is still present. Just wanted to let you'll know
> about it.
>
> Should anyone need any info, please let me know.
>

Well, for starters, your hardware info ("hda-intel" describes 1000s of
slightly different devices).

Does it work with the latest ALSA CVS or 1.0.11-rc4?

Lee

2006-03-31 16:49:21

by Alejandro Bonilla

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: snd_hda_intel on 2.6.16

On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 11:40:58 -0500, Lee Revell wrote
> On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 10:29 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I read about a problem with snd_hda_intel latelly on 2.6.16. I was not having
> > this on 2.6.15-19 but looks like it is "chip-monking"
> >
>
> Too cryptic. What exactly is the problem?

The sound is like at 1.2x. Just a little bit faster but noticeable.

>
> > I use linux2.6 git and it is still present. Just wanted to let you'll know
> > about it.
> >
> > Should anyone need any info, please let me know.
> >
>
> Well, for starters, your hardware info ("hda-intel" describes 1000s
> of slightly different devices).

0000:00:1b.0 0403: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition
Audio Controller (rev 02)
Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company: Unknown device 30a0
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr-
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort-
<TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 0x10 (64 bytes)
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 50
Region 0: Memory at d8240000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2
Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=55mA
PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+)
Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
Capabilities: [60] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit+ Queue=0/0 Enable-
Address: 0000000000000000 Data: 0000
Capabilities: [70] #10 [0091]

Pretty much, I almost only know it is Conexant.

>
> Does it work with the latest ALSA CVS or 1.0.11-rc4?

I don't know. It was working with 2.6.15-X

.Alejandro

>
> Lee


2006-03-31 16:59:00

by Lee Revell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: snd_hda_intel on 2.6.16

On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 10:49 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
> > Does it work with the latest ALSA CVS or 1.0.11-rc4?
>
> I don't know. It was working with 2.6.15-X

Please test ALSA CVS or 1.0.11-rc4.

Lee

2006-03-31 17:07:20

by Lee Revell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: snd_hda_intel on 2.6.16

On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 10:49 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
> > Does it work with the latest ALSA CVS or 1.0.11-rc4?
>
> I don't know. It was working with 2.6.15-X
>

Disregard last message, it's probably easiest to test the [ALSA PATCH]
that was just posted.

Lee

2006-03-31 17:12:14

by Alejandro Bonilla

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: snd_hda_intel on 2.6.16

On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 12:07:12 -0500, Lee Revell wrote
> On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 10:49 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
> > > Does it work with the latest ALSA CVS or 1.0.11-rc4?
> >
> > I don't know. It was working with 2.6.15-X
> >
>
> Disregard last message, it's probably easiest to test the [ALSA
> PATCH] that was just posted.

I will git fetch soon and see if it got merged and test that out.

Thanks,

.Alejandro


>
> Lee

2006-03-31 17:47:48

by Takashi Iwai

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: snd_hda_intel on 2.6.16

At Fri, 31 Mar 2006 10:49:19 -0600,
Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
>
> On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 11:40:58 -0500, Lee Revell wrote
> > On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 10:29 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I read about a problem with snd_hda_intel latelly on 2.6.16. I was not having
> > > this on 2.6.15-19 but looks like it is "chip-monking"
> > >
> >
> > Too cryptic. What exactly is the problem?
>
> The sound is like at 1.2x. Just a little bit faster but noticeable.

Faster? You mean pitch or only playback speed?
It's the first report I've heard. Usually, the regression is either
noisy output or silence...

Try position_fix=1, or a different value, if the latest ALSA version
still doesn't work.


> > > I use linux2.6 git and it is still present. Just wanted to let you'll know
> > > about it.
> > >
> > > Should anyone need any info, please let me know.
> > >
> >
> > Well, for starters, your hardware info ("hda-intel" describes 1000s
> > of slightly different devices).
>
> 0000:00:1b.0 0403: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition
> Audio Controller (rev 02)
> Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company: Unknown device 30a0
> Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr-
> Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
> Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort-
> <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
> Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 0x10 (64 bytes)
> Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 50
> Region 0: Memory at d8240000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
> Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2
> Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=55mA
> PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+)
> Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
> Capabilities: [60] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit+ Queue=0/0 Enable-
> Address: 0000000000000000 Data: 0000
> Capabilities: [70] #10 [0091]
>
> Pretty much, I almost only know it is Conexant.

Better check /proc/asound/card0/codec#* files.

Sigh, Conexant. It's a problematic one. They don't give any
technical information.

> >
> > Does it work with the latest ALSA CVS or 1.0.11-rc4?
>
> I don't know. It was working with 2.6.15-X


Any other changes on your system except for kernel?


Takashi

2006-03-31 18:20:39

by Alejandro Bonilla

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: snd_hda_intel on 2.6.16

On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:47:43 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote
> At Fri, 31 Mar 2006 10:49:19 -0600,
> Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 11:40:58 -0500, Lee Revell wrote
> > > On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 10:29 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I read about a problem with snd_hda_intel latelly on 2.6.16. I was not
having
> > > > this on 2.6.15-19 but looks like it is "chip-monking"
> > > >
> > >
> > > Too cryptic. What exactly is the problem?
> >
> > The sound is like at 1.2x. Just a little bit faster but noticeable.
>
> Faster? You mean pitch or only playback speed?

Yes, it is just a bit faster. In speed.

> It's the first report I've heard. Usually, the regression is either
> noisy output or silence...
>
> Try position_fix=1, or a different value, if the latest ALSA version
> still doesn't work.
root@ubuntu:~# echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/HDA\
Intel/module/parameters/position_fix
-bash: /sys/bus/pci/drivers/HDA Intel/module/parameters/position_fix:
Permission denied

It might take me awhile to unload all the modules and try loading it again. :)
I'll get back to you.

and

I will try the new patch when gets merged.

>
> > > > I use linux2.6 git and it is still present. Just wanted to let you'll know
> > > > about it.
> > > >
> > > > Should anyone need any info, please let me know.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Well, for starters, your hardware info ("hda-intel" describes 1000s
> > > of slightly different devices).
> >
> > 0000:00:1b.0 0403: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition
> > Audio Controller (rev 02)
> > Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company: Unknown device 30a0
> > Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr-
> > Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
> > Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort-
> > <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
> > Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 0x10 (64 bytes)
> > Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 50
> > Region 0: Memory at d8240000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
> > Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2
> > Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=55mA
> > PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+)
> > Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
> > Capabilities: [60] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit+ Queue=0/0
Enable-
> > Address: 0000000000000000 Data: 0000
> > Capabilities: [70] #10 [0091]
> >
> > Pretty much, I almost only know it is Conexant.
>
> Better check /proc/asound/card0/codec#* files.

The file is too big, any hint of what you might want to look at?

>
> Sigh, Conexant. It's a problematic one. They don't give any
> technical information.

:|

>
> > >
> > > Does it work with the latest ALSA CVS or 1.0.11-rc4?
> >
> > I don't know. It was working with 2.6.15-X
>
> Any other changes on your system except for kernel?

No, if I boot back to 2.6.15-19 it works.

>
> Takashi


--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)