No available servers is more an error message than something informational. It
should also be rate-limited, else we're going to flood our logs on a busy
director, if all real servers are out of order with a weight of zero.
Signed-off-by: Sven Wegener <[email protected]>
---
Actually, do we need this message at all? The wrr scheduler is the only one
printing an error message in such a case.
net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_wrr.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_wrr.c b/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_wrr.c
index 749fa04..85c680a 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_wrr.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_wrr.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/net.h>
#include <net/ip_vs.h>
@@ -169,7 +170,7 @@ ip_vs_wrr_schedule(struct ip_vs_service *svc, const struct sk_buff *skb)
*/
if (mark->cw == 0) {
mark->cl = &svc->destinations;
- IP_VS_INFO("ip_vs_wrr_schedule(): "
+ IP_VS_ERR_RL("ip_vs_wrr_schedule(): "
"no available servers\n");
dest = NULL;
goto out;
--
1.5.3.7
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:30:21PM +0100, Sven Wegener wrote:
> No available servers is more an error message than something informational. It
> should also be rate-limited, else we're going to flood our logs on a busy
> director, if all real servers are out of order with a weight of zero.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sven Wegener <[email protected]>
Hi Sven,
this looks good to me.
Acked-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> Actually, do we need this message at all? The wrr scheduler is the only one
> printing an error message in such a case.
I was wondering about that too. Though I'd err on the side of adding
it to the other schedulers as neccessary rather than removing it here.
But if you'd rather just get rid of it, I have no strong objections.
--
Horms
From: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:19:09 +0900
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:30:21PM +0100, Sven Wegener wrote:
> > No available servers is more an error message than something informational. It
> > should also be rate-limited, else we're going to flood our logs on a busy
> > director, if all real servers are out of order with a weight of zero.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sven Wegener <[email protected]>
>
> Hi Sven,
>
> this looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
Applied, thanks.