2008-02-15 20:13:48

by Glauber Costa

Subject: [PATCH] remove is_processor_present prototype

The function itself is defined just below,
so this prototype is not really useful.

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[email protected]>
---
drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 2 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
index 75ccf5d..923fddb 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
@@ -826,8 +826,6 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU
* Acpi processor hotplug support *
****************************************************************************/

-static int is_processor_present(acpi_handle handle);
-
static int is_processor_present(acpi_handle handle)
{
acpi_status status;
--
1.4.2

2008-02-15 20:13:29

by Glauber Costa

Subject: [PATCH] use ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT instead of printk

For consistency, use ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT instead of printk
in acpi_processor_hotplug_notify() for BUS_CHECK and DEVICE_CHECK
events

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[email protected]>
---
drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
index 923fddb..673fb92 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
@@ -890,9 +890,10 @@ acpi_processor_hotplug_notify(acpi_handl
switch (event) {
case ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK:
case ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK:
- printk("Processor driver received %s event\n",
+ ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
+ "Processor driver received %s event\n",
(event == ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK) ?
- "ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK" : "ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK");
+ "ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK" : "ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK"));

if (!is_processor_present(handle))
break;
--
1.4.2