2008-12-17 17:51:59

by Jaswinder Singh Rajput

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] x86: process.c declare c1e_remove_cpu before they get used

Impact: cleanup

Included asm/idle.h for c1e_remove_cpu declaration.

Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh <[email protected]>
---
arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
index f50f8bf..25313de 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include <linux/ftrace.h>
#include <asm/system.h>
#include <asm/apic.h>
+#include <asm/idle.h>

unsigned long idle_halt;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(idle_halt);
--
1.5.5.1



2008-12-18 12:36:38

by Ingo Molnar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: process.c declare c1e_remove_cpu before they get used


* Jaswinder Singh <[email protected]> wrote:

> Impact: cleanup
>
> Included asm/idle.h for c1e_remove_cpu declaration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> index f50f8bf..25313de 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> #include <linux/ftrace.h>
> #include <asm/system.h>
> #include <asm/apic.h>
> +#include <asm/idle.h>
>
> unsigned long idle_halt;
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(idle_halt);

hm, why is this needed? Have you seen a compiler warning?

Ingo

2008-12-18 18:39:28

by Jaswinder Singh Rajput

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: process.c declare c1e_remove_cpu before they get used

On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 13:36 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> hm, why is this needed? Have you seen a compiler warning?
>

I was getting :

CHECK arch/x86/kernel/process.c
arch/x86/kernel/process.c:284:6: warning: symbol 'c1e_remove_cpu' was not declared. Should it be static?

Thank you,

Jaswinder Singh.

2008-12-18 21:12:19

by Ingo Molnar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: process.c declare c1e_remove_cpu before they get used


* Jaswinder Singh <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 13:36 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > hm, why is this needed? Have you seen a compiler warning?
> >
>
> I was getting :
>
> CHECK arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> arch/x86/kernel/process.c:284:6: warning: symbol 'c1e_remove_cpu' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Thank you,

ah, good. Feel free to include such information in future patches. I've
applied your patch to tip/x86/cleanups, thanks! See below how the final
commit looks like - added the sparse warning as well.

Ingo

--------------->
>From f0bc2202e0373eb8e9b1ddbec930e2e681357db8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaswinder Singh <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:20:05 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] x86: process.c declare c1e_remove_cpu before they get used

Impact: cleanup, avoid sparse warning

Included asm/idle.h for c1e_remove_cpu() declaration. Fixes this
sparse warning:

CHECK arch/x86/kernel/process.c
arch/x86/kernel/process.c:284:6: warning: symbol 'c1e_remove_cpu' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
---
arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
index c622772..b06100f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <asm/idle.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>