Monday 23 November 2009 18:57:51 Janusz Krzysztofik napisał(a):
> Initialy submitted on 2009-11-16
> (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg20629.html).
> Resendig due to fbdev mailing list address changed.
>
> The series consists of 2 patches:
>
> [PATCH 1/2] omapfb: lcd_ams_delta: add support for contrast control
> [PATCH 2/2] OMAP: ams_delta_defconfig: enable LCD class device support
>
> It is intended for 2.6.33, if it's not too late.
Hi,
Now that Tony has changed the series status from New to Awaiting Upstream in
his patchwork queue[1][2], chances of getting it in throungh linux-omap tree,
like a few other omapfb related patches managed to do lately, seem falling
down drastically to me if still not answered by anyone involved in omapfb
development.
Imre,
Could you please take the patches, or give your ack for Tony to take them, or
just point me on the right way to the get them integrated or NAKed, if none
of the former is?
Tomi,
I am not sure if you are the right person for bothering here, but maybe you
could give your comments that would help pushing it forward?
Thanks,
Janusz
[1] http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/62248/
[2] http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/62249/
* Janusz Krzysztofik <[email protected]> [091205 05:54]:
> Monday 23 November 2009 18:57:51 Janusz Krzysztofik napisał(a):
> > Initialy submitted on 2009-11-16
> > (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg20629.html).
> > Resendig due to fbdev mailing list address changed.
> >
> > The series consists of 2 patches:
> >
> > [PATCH 1/2] omapfb: lcd_ams_delta: add support for contrast control
> > [PATCH 2/2] OMAP: ams_delta_defconfig: enable LCD class device support
> >
> > It is intended for 2.6.33, if it's not too late.
>
> Hi,
>
> Now that Tony has changed the series status from New to Awaiting Upstream in
> his patchwork queue[1][2], chances of getting it in throungh linux-omap tree,
> like a few other omapfb related patches managed to do lately, seem falling
> down drastically to me if still not answered by anyone involved in omapfb
> development.
>
> Imre,
> Could you please take the patches, or give your ack for Tony to take them, or
> just point me on the right way to the get them integrated or NAKed, if none
> of the former is?
>
> Tomi,
> I am not sure if you are the right person for bothering here, but maybe you
> could give your comments that would help pushing it forward?
I'd prefer Tomi to merge all the drivers/video/omap code rather
than merge it via linux-omap tree. Ideally with an ack from
Imre where possible.
Tony
> Thanks,
> Janusz
>
> [1] http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/62248/
> [2] http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/62249/
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 22:32 +0100, ext Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Janusz Krzysztofik <[email protected]> [091205 05:54]:
> > Monday 23 November 2009 18:57:51 Janusz Krzysztofik napisał(a):
> > > Initialy submitted on 2009-11-16
> > > (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg20629.html).
> > > Resendig due to fbdev mailing list address changed.
> > >
> > > The series consists of 2 patches:
> > >
> > > [PATCH 1/2] omapfb: lcd_ams_delta: add support for contrast control
> > > [PATCH 2/2] OMAP: ams_delta_defconfig: enable LCD class device support
> > >
> > > It is intended for 2.6.33, if it's not too late.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Now that Tony has changed the series status from New to Awaiting Upstream in
> > his patchwork queue[1][2], chances of getting it in throungh linux-omap tree,
> > like a few other omapfb related patches managed to do lately, seem falling
> > down drastically to me if still not answered by anyone involved in omapfb
> > development.
> >
> > Imre,
> > Could you please take the patches, or give your ack for Tony to take them, or
> > just point me on the right way to the get them integrated or NAKed, if none
> > of the former is?
> >
> > Tomi,
> > I am not sure if you are the right person for bothering here, but maybe you
> > could give your comments that would help pushing it forward?
>
> I'd prefer Tomi to merge all the drivers/video/omap code rather
> than merge it via linux-omap tree. Ideally with an ack from
> Imre where possible.
And I, on the other hand, would like to keep away from the old omapfb
driver =).
Imre, do you still want to be the maintainer of the old omapfb, or how
should we handle it? I didn't have any plans to maintain it, but then
again, perhaps it wouldn't be too much of a burden to have the
(hopefully) few patches for old omapfb in the DSS2 tree.
Tomi
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 22:32 +0100, ext Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Janusz Krzysztofik <[email protected]> [091205 05:54]:
> > Monday 23 November 2009 18:57:51 Janusz Krzysztofik napisał(a):
> > > Initialy submitted on 2009-11-16
> > > (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg20629.html).
> > > Resendig due to fbdev mailing list address changed.
> > >
> > > The series consists of 2 patches:
> > >
> > > [PATCH 1/2] omapfb: lcd_ams_delta: add support for contrast control
> > > [PATCH 2/2] OMAP: ams_delta_defconfig: enable LCD class device support
> > >
> > > It is intended for 2.6.33, if it's not too late.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Now that Tony has changed the series status from New to Awaiting Upstream in
> > his patchwork queue[1][2], chances of getting it in throungh linux-omap tree,
> > like a few other omapfb related patches managed to do lately, seem falling
> > down drastically to me if still not answered by anyone involved in omapfb
> > development.
> >
> > Imre,
> > Could you please take the patches, or give your ack for Tony to take them, or
> > just point me on the right way to the get them integrated or NAKed, if none
> > of the former is?
> >
> > Tomi,
> > I am not sure if you are the right person for bothering here, but maybe you
> > could give your comments that would help pushing it forward?
>
> I'd prefer Tomi to merge all the drivers/video/omap code rather
> than merge it via linux-omap tree. Ideally with an ack from
> Imre where possible.
I talked with Imre, and he's not too keen on maintaining the old omapfb,
so I'll take over it. And perhaps it's easier to have all omap display
related patches in one place.
Tomi