2009-12-23 13:13:21

by Tobias Klauser

Subject: [PATCH] regulator/lp3971: Storage class should be before const qualifier

The C99 specification states in section 6.11.5:

The placement of a storage-class specifier other than at the beginning
of the declaration specifiers in a declaration is an obsolescent
feature.

Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <[email protected]>
---
drivers/regulator/lp3971.c | 10 +++++-----
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/lp3971.c b/drivers/regulator/lp3971.c
index 76d08c2..9416f0c 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/lp3971.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/lp3971.c
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static int lp3971_set_bits(struct lp3971 *lp3971, u8 reg, u16 mask, u16 val);
#define LP3971_BUCK2_BASE 0x29
#define LP3971_BUCK3_BASE 0x32

-const static int buck_base_addr[] = {
+static const int buck_base_addr[] = {
LP3971_BUCK1_BASE,
LP3971_BUCK2_BASE,
LP3971_BUCK3_BASE,
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ const static int buck_base_addr[] = {
#define LP3971_BUCK_TARGET_VOL1_REG(x) (buck_base_addr[x])
#define LP3971_BUCK_TARGET_VOL2_REG(x) (buck_base_addr[x]+1)

-const static int buck_voltage_map[] = {
+static const int buck_voltage_map[] = {
0, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, 1050, 1100,
1150, 1200, 1250, 1300, 1350, 1400, 1450, 1500,
1550, 1600, 1650, 1700, 1800, 1900, 2500, 2800,
@@ -96,17 +96,17 @@ const static int buck_voltage_map[] = {
#define LDO_VOL_CONTR_SHIFT(x) ((x & 1) << 2)
#define LDO_VOL_CONTR_MASK 0x0f

-const static int ldo45_voltage_map[] = {
+static const int ldo45_voltage_map[] = {
1000, 1050, 1100, 1150, 1200, 1250, 1300, 1350,
1400, 1500, 1800, 1900, 2500, 2800, 3000, 3300,
};

-const static int ldo123_voltage_map[] = {
+static const int ldo123_voltage_map[] = {
1800, 1900, 2000, 2100, 2200, 2300, 2400, 2500,
2600, 2700, 2800, 2900, 3000, 3100, 3200, 3300,
};

-const static int *ldo_voltage_map[] = {
+static const int *ldo_voltage_map[] = {
ldo123_voltage_map, /* LDO1 */
ldo123_voltage_map, /* LDO2 */
ldo123_voltage_map, /* LDO3 */
--
1.6.3.3

2009-12-23 14:03:14

by Mark Brown

Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator/lp3971: Storage class should be before const qualifier

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 02:13:17PM +0100, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> The C99 specification states in section 6.11.5:
>
> The placement of a storage-class specifier other than at the beginning
> of the declaration specifiers in a declaration is an obsolescent
> feature.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>

2009-12-24 10:13:17

by Liam Girdwood

Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator/lp3971: Storage class should be before const qualifier

On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 14:13 +0100, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> The C99 specification states in section 6.11.5:
>
> The placement of a storage-class specifier other than at the beginning
> of the declaration specifiers in a declaration is an obsolescent
> feature.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/lp3971.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>

Applied.

Thanks

Liam