Quoting "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>:
> On Tuesday, February 01, 2011, matthieu castet wrote:
> Well, in my not so humble opinion the amount of random fixes required by the
> entire NX protection of kernel "data" pages is simply unacceptable.
What's the relation between this bug and NX protection of kernel "data" ?
Matthieu
On Tuesday, February 01, 2011, [email protected] wrote:
> Quoting "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>:
>
> > On Tuesday, February 01, 2011, matthieu castet wrote:
> > Well, in my not so humble opinion the amount of random fixes required by the
> > entire NX protection of kernel "data" pages is simply unacceptable.
>
> What's the relation between this bug and NX protection of kernel "data" ?
Sorry, I confused threads.
Rafael