The patch below removes an extra "l" in the word.
Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock <[email protected]>
---
sound/soc/samsung/dma.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/samsung/dma.c b/sound/soc/samsung/dma.c
index 2124019..807efa5 100644
--- a/sound/soc/samsung/dma.c
+++ b/sound/soc/samsung/dma.c
@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ dma_pointer(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
/* we seem to be getting the odd error from the pcm library due
* to out-of-bounds pointers. this is maybe due to the dma engine
* not having loaded the new values for the channel before being
- * callled... (todo - fix )
+ * called... (todo - fix )
*/
if (res >= snd_pcm_lib_buffer_bytes(substream)) {
--
1.7.4.1
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Justin P. Mattock
<[email protected]> wrote:
> The patch below removes an extra "l" in the word.
>
> Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jassi Brar <[email protected]>
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 16:00 +0900, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Justin P. Mattock
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The patch below removes an extra "l" in the word.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock <[email protected]>
>
> Acked-by: Jassi Brar <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Liam Girdwood <[email protected]>
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:16:37PM -0800, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
> The patch below removes an extra "l" in the word.
>
> Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock <[email protected]>
Applied.
Please remember to CC maintainers on patches as covered in
Documentation/SubmittingPatches, even trivial patches should be made
visible to maintainers. Please also try to use changelogs for your
patch which resemble other changelogs for the code area you're working
on.
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:16:37PM -0800, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
> > The patch below removes an extra "l" in the word.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock <[email protected]>
>
> Applied.
I don't see it in linux-next as of today though ... ?
>
> Please remember to CC maintainers on patches as covered in
> Documentation/SubmittingPatches, even trivial patches should be made
> visible to maintainers. Please also try to use changelogs for your
> patch which resemble other changelogs for the code area you're working
> on.
>
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 03:26:16PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Feb 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Applied.
> I don't see it in linux-next as of today though ... ?
I do - it's ceade6c81bd913b23bffb3d80909ea430850c79b. I rewrote the
subject line because:
> > Please remember to CC maintainers on patches as covered in
> > Documentation/SubmittingPatches, even trivial patches should be made
> > visible to maintainers. Please also try to use changelogs for your
> > patch which resemble other changelogs for the code area you're working
> > on.
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 03:26:16PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Feb 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > Applied.
>
> > I don't see it in linux-next as of today though ... ?
>
> I do - it's ceade6c81bd913b23bffb3d80909ea430850c79b.
Bah, I had bogus clone of linux-next, sorry for the noise.
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.