On 2017年10月24日 09:21, Andi Kleen wrote:
> kemi <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>> I'll see if I can find some
>>> time to implement the above in a nice way.
>>
>> Agree. Maybe something like test_and_set_bit() would be more suitable.
>
> test_and_set_bit is a very different operation for the CPU because
> it is atomic for both. But we want the initial read to not
> be atomic.
>
I meant to express the meaning of test before setting bit.
Apologize to make you confused.
> If you add special functions use a different variant that is only
> atomic for the set.
>
> -Andi
>
From 1582099983404462782@xxx Tue Oct 24 01:22:00 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1582062716863867471
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums