From: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
This breaks the earlier patch to support AB9540 apart into
smaller pieces, and uses the platform device ID to enforce
which version of the ASIC is being used.
Sam: seeking ACKs for these, [1/4] could possibly go into
the -rc series if you find time for it.
Linus Walleij (4):
mfd/ab8500: fix error path bug
mfd/ab8500: add version detection and enforcing
mfd/ab8500: parametrize IRQ masks and registers
mfd/ab8500: support AB9540 variant
arch/arm/mach-ux500/board-mop500.c | 1 -
.../mach-ux500/include/mach/irqs-board-mop500.h | 2 +-
drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c | 301 ++++++++++++++++----
drivers/mfd/ab8500-i2c.c | 15 +-
include/linux/mfd/abx500.h | 7 -
include/linux/mfd/abx500/ab8500-gpio.h | 4 +-
include/linux/mfd/abx500/ab8500-sysctrl.h | 43 +++
include/linux/mfd/abx500/ab8500.h | 114 +++++++-
include/linux/regulator/ab8500.h | 70 +++++-
9 files changed, 487 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
--
1.7.8
Hi Linus,
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 05:09:07PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> From: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
>
> This breaks the earlier patch to support AB9540 apart into
> smaller pieces, and uses the platform device ID to enforce
> which version of the ASIC is being used.
>
> Sam: seeking ACKs for these, [1/4] could possibly go into
> the -rc series if you find time for it.
Yes, I will add it to my final fixes pull request to the other Linus.
Could you please fix patch #1 according to Maxime's comments and remove the
board-mop500.c diff from patch #2 ?
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Samuel Ortiz <[email protected]> wrote:
> Could you please fix patch #1 according to Maxime's comments and remove the
> board-mop500.c diff from patch #2 ?
OK I've sent out a v2 revision of the patches, thanks!
Yours,
Linus Walleij