2012-05-03 18:17:53

by Rajiv Andrade

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PULL] TPM: MAINTAINERS contacts update and error report fix


Hi James,

The following changes since commit 08162e6a23d476544adfe1164afe9ea8b34ab859:

Yama: remove an unused variable (2012-04-23 17:20:22 +1000)

are available in the git repository at:
git://github.com/srajiv/tpm.git for-james

The first as the subject implies is just a contacts update, and the second
makes the driver avoid to mistakenly report the disabled and deactivated TPM
states as an error.

Marcel Selhorst (1):
MAINTAINERS: TPM maintainers' contacts update

Rajiv Andrade (1):
TPM: chip disabled state erronously being reported as error

MAINTAINERS | 4 ++--
drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c | 13 +++++++++++--
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c | 6 +++---
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index f31aa0c..731440f 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -6746,10 +6746,10 @@ F: include/linux/shmem_fs.h
F: mm/shmem.c

TPM DEVICE DRIVER
-M: Debora Velarde <[email protected]>
M: Rajiv Andrade <[email protected]>
W: http://tpmdd.sourceforge.net
-M: Marcel Selhorst <[email protected]>
+M: Marcel Selhorst <[email protected]>
+M: Sirrix AG <[email protected]>
W: http://www.sirrix.com
L: [email protected] (moderated for non-subscribers)
S: Maintained
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
index ad7c732..9511abd 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
@@ -827,10 +827,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_pcr_extend);
int tpm_do_selftest(struct tpm_chip *chip)
{
int rc;
- u8 digest[TPM_DIGEST_SIZE];
unsigned int loops;
unsigned int delay_msec = 1000;
unsigned long duration;
+ struct tpm_cmd_t cmd;

duration = tpm_calc_ordinal_duration(chip,
TPM_ORD_CONTINUE_SELFTEST);
@@ -845,7 +845,16 @@ int tpm_do_selftest(struct tpm_chip *chip)
return rc;

do {
- rc = __tpm_pcr_read(chip, 0, digest);
+ /* Attempt to read a PCR value */
+ cmd.header.in = pcrread_header;
+ cmd.params.pcrread_in.pcr_idx = cpu_to_be32(0);
+ rc = tpm_transmit(chip, (u8 *) &cmd, READ_PCR_RESULT_SIZE);
+
+ if (rc < TPM_HEADER_SIZE)
+ return -EFAULT;
+ else
+ rc = be32_to_cpu(cmd.header.out.return_code);
+
if (rc == TPM_ERR_DISABLED || rc == TPM_ERR_DEACTIVATED) {
dev_info(chip->dev,
"TPM is disabled/deactivated (0x%X)\n", rc);
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c
index 76da32e..3251a44 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c
@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
* SLD 9630 TT 1.1 and SLB 9635 TT 1.2 Trusted Platform Module
* Specifications at http://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org
*
- * Copyright (C) 2005, Marcel Selhorst <[email protected]>
- * Sirrix AG - security technologies, http://www.sirrix.com and
+ * Copyright (C) 2005, Marcel Selhorst <[email protected]>
+ * Sirrix AG - security technologies <[email protected]> and
* Applied Data Security Group, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany
* Project-Homepage: http://www.trust.rub.de/projects/linux-device-driver-infineon-tpm/
*
@@ -671,7 +671,7 @@ static void __exit cleanup_inf(void)
module_init(init_inf);
module_exit(cleanup_inf);

-MODULE_AUTHOR("Marcel Selhorst <[email protected]>");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Marcel Selhorst <[email protected]>");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Driver for Infineon TPM SLD 9630 TT 1.1 / SLB 9635 TT 1.2");
MODULE_VERSION("1.9.2");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");






2012-05-03 20:14:46

by Joe Perches

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PULL] TPM: MAINTAINERS contacts update and error report fix

On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 14:10 -0300, Rajiv Andrade wrote:
> The first as the subject implies is just a contacts update, and the second
> makes the driver avoid to mistakenly report the disabled and deactivated TPM
> states as an error.

trivia:

> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
[]
> @@ -845,7 +845,16 @@ int tpm_do_selftest(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> return rc;
>
> do {
> - rc = __tpm_pcr_read(chip, 0, digest);
> + /* Attempt to read a PCR value */
> + cmd.header.in = pcrread_header;
> + cmd.params.pcrread_in.pcr_idx = cpu_to_be32(0);
> + rc = tpm_transmit(chip, (u8 *) &cmd, READ_PCR_RESULT_SIZE);
> +
> + if (rc < TPM_HEADER_SIZE)
> + return -EFAULT;
> + else
> + rc = be32_to_cpu(cmd.header.out.return_code);

The else shouldn't be used here.
Indented code followed by an unindented test is not nice.

> +
> if (rc == TPM_ERR_DISABLED || rc == TPM_ERR_DEACTIVATED) {
> dev_info(chip->dev,
> "TPM is disabled/deactivated (0x%X)\n", rc);

A more kernel style conformant style looks like:

rc = tpm_transmit(chip, (u8 *)&cmd, READ_PCR_RESULT_SIZE);
if (rc < TPM_HEADER_SIZE)
return -EFAULT;

rc = be32_to_cpu(cmd.header.out.return_code);
if (rc == TPM_ERR_DISABLED || rc == TPM_ERR_DEACTIVATED) {
etc...

2012-05-07 17:17:16

by Rajiv Andrade

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PULL] TPM: MAINTAINERS contacts update and error report fix

On 03/05/12 17:14, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 14:10 -0300, Rajiv Andrade wrote:
>> The first as the subject implies is just a contacts update, and the second
>> makes the driver avoid to mistakenly report the disabled and deactivated TPM
>> states as an error.
> trivia:
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
> []
>> @@ -845,7 +845,16 @@ int tpm_do_selftest(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>> return rc;
>>
>> do {
>> - rc = __tpm_pcr_read(chip, 0, digest);
>> + /* Attempt to read a PCR value */
>> + cmd.header.in = pcrread_header;
>> + cmd.params.pcrread_in.pcr_idx = cpu_to_be32(0);
>> + rc = tpm_transmit(chip, (u8 *)&cmd, READ_PCR_RESULT_SIZE);
>> +
>> + if (rc< TPM_HEADER_SIZE)
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> + else
>> + rc = be32_to_cpu(cmd.header.out.return_code);
> The else shouldn't be used here.
> Indented code followed by an unindented test is not nice.
Yep.. I missed it.
>
>> +
>> if (rc == TPM_ERR_DISABLED || rc == TPM_ERR_DEACTIVATED) {
>> dev_info(chip->dev,
>> "TPM is disabled/deactivated (0x%X)\n", rc);
> A more kernel style conformant style looks like:
>
> rc = tpm_transmit(chip, (u8 *)&cmd, READ_PCR_RESULT_SIZE);
> if (rc< TPM_HEADER_SIZE)
> return -EFAULT;
>
> rc = be32_to_cpu(cmd.header.out.return_code);
> if (rc == TPM_ERR_DISABLED || rc == TPM_ERR_DEACTIVATED) {
> etc...
>
>
Thanks for pointing.

James, please ignore, I'll send a better version of this fix.

Rajiv