2013-05-02 10:19:15

by amit daniel kachhap

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH V2] thermal: exynos: Support for TMU regulator defined at device tree

TMU probe function now checks for a device tree defined regulator.
For compatibility reasons it is allowed to probe driver even without
this regulator defined.

Signed-off-by: Luk asz Majewski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <[email protected]>
---

Changes in V2:
* Added log message in regulator_get failure as suggested by Sylwester.
* Used IS_ERR for checking regulator pointer as suggested by Sylwester.

This patch is repost of the patch posted by Lukasz Majewski
(https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2488211/). I have rebased this
patch on top of my TMU re-structured patch series
(http://lwn.net/Articles/548634/). Although I thought of handling
regulator as one type of feature (newly added) but could not do
so as regulator is a board/platform property and not SOC property so
leaving the device tree to define and handle it.

.../devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt | 4 ++++
drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
index 970eeba..ff62f7a 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
@@ -14,6 +14,9 @@
- interrupts : Should contain interrupt for thermal system
- clocks : The main clock for TMU device
- clock-names : Thermal system clock name
+- vtmu-supply: This entry is optional and provides the regulator node supplying
+ voltage to TMU. If needed this entry can be placed inside
+ board/platform specific dts file.

Example 1):

@@ -25,6 +28,7 @@ Example 1):
clocks = <&clock 383>;
clock-names = "tmu_apbif";
status = "disabled";
+ vtmu-supply = <&tmu_regulator_node>;
};

Example 2):
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
index 72446c9..b7c609a 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
#include <linux/of_address.h>
#include <linux/of_irq.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/workqueue.h>
#include "exynos_thermal_common.h"
@@ -52,6 +53,7 @@
* @clk: pointer to the clock structure.
* @temp_error1: fused value of the first point trim.
* @temp_error2: fused value of the second point trim.
+ * @regulator: pointer to the TMU regulator structure.
* @reg_conf: pointer to structure to register with core thermal.
*/
struct exynos_tmu_data {
@@ -65,6 +67,7 @@ struct exynos_tmu_data {
struct mutex lock;
struct clk *clk;
u8 temp_error1, temp_error2;
+ struct regulator *regulator;
struct thermal_sensor_conf *reg_conf;
};

@@ -501,10 +504,23 @@ static int exynos_map_dt_data(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct exynos_tmu_data *data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
struct exynos_tmu_platform_data *pdata = data->pdata;
struct resource res;
+ int ret;

if (!data)
return -ENODEV;

+ /* Try enabling the regulator if found */
+ data->regulator = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "vtmu");
+ if (!IS_ERR(data->regulator)) {
+ ret = regulator_enable(data->regulator);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to enable vtmu\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+ } else {
+ dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Regulator node (vtmu) not found\n");
+ }
+
data->id = of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "tmuctrl");
if (data->id < 0)
data->id = 0;
@@ -669,6 +685,9 @@ static int exynos_tmu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)

clk_unprepare(data->clk);

+ if (!IS_ERR(data->regulator))
+ regulator_disable(data->regulator);
+
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);

return 0;
--
1.7.1


2013-06-19 20:03:44

by Eduardo Valentin

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] thermal: exynos: Support for TMU regulator defined at device tree

On 02-05-2013 06:18, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> TMU probe function now checks for a device tree defined regulator.
> For compatibility reasons it is allowed to probe driver even without
> this regulator defined.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luk asz Majewski <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <[email protected]>

I assume this one got superseeded by the same patch on your 30 patch
series, right?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2731031/


> ---
>
> Changes in V2:
> * Added log message in regulator_get failure as suggested by Sylwester.
> * Used IS_ERR for checking regulator pointer as suggested by Sylwester.
>
> This patch is repost of the patch posted by Lukasz Majewski
> (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2488211/). I have rebased this
> patch on top of my TMU re-structured patch series
> (http://lwn.net/Articles/548634/). Although I thought of handling
> regulator as one type of feature (newly added) but could not do
> so as regulator is a board/platform property and not SOC property so
> leaving the device tree to define and handle it.
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt | 4 ++++
> drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
> index 970eeba..ff62f7a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
> @@ -14,6 +14,9 @@
> - interrupts : Should contain interrupt for thermal system
> - clocks : The main clock for TMU device
> - clock-names : Thermal system clock name
> +- vtmu-supply: This entry is optional and provides the regulator node supplying
> + voltage to TMU. If needed this entry can be placed inside
> + board/platform specific dts file.
>
> Example 1):
>
> @@ -25,6 +28,7 @@ Example 1):
> clocks = <&clock 383>;
> clock-names = "tmu_apbif";
> status = "disabled";
> + vtmu-supply = <&tmu_regulator_node>;
> };
>
> Example 2):
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> index 72446c9..b7c609a 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
> #include <linux/of_address.h>
> #include <linux/of_irq.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> #include "exynos_thermal_common.h"
> @@ -52,6 +53,7 @@
> * @clk: pointer to the clock structure.
> * @temp_error1: fused value of the first point trim.
> * @temp_error2: fused value of the second point trim.
> + * @regulator: pointer to the TMU regulator structure.
> * @reg_conf: pointer to structure to register with core thermal.
> */
> struct exynos_tmu_data {
> @@ -65,6 +67,7 @@ struct exynos_tmu_data {
> struct mutex lock;
> struct clk *clk;
> u8 temp_error1, temp_error2;
> + struct regulator *regulator;
> struct thermal_sensor_conf *reg_conf;
> };
>
> @@ -501,10 +504,23 @@ static int exynos_map_dt_data(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct exynos_tmu_data *data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> struct exynos_tmu_platform_data *pdata = data->pdata;
> struct resource res;
> + int ret;
>
> if (!data)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> + /* Try enabling the regulator if found */
> + data->regulator = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "vtmu");
> + if (!IS_ERR(data->regulator)) {
> + ret = regulator_enable(data->regulator);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to enable vtmu\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> + } else {
> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Regulator node (vtmu) not found\n");
> + }
> +
> data->id = of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "tmuctrl");
> if (data->id < 0)
> data->id = 0;
> @@ -669,6 +685,9 @@ static int exynos_tmu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> clk_unprepare(data->clk);
>
> + if (!IS_ERR(data->regulator))
> + regulator_disable(data->regulator);
> +
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>
> return 0;
>


--
You have got to be excited about what you are doing. (L. Lamport)

Eduardo Valentin


Attachments:
signature.asc (295.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature

2013-06-21 04:03:14

by amit daniel kachhap

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] thermal: exynos: Support for TMU regulator defined at device tree

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 1:33 AM, Eduardo Valentin
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 02-05-2013 06:18, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>> TMU probe function now checks for a device tree defined regulator.
>> For compatibility reasons it is allowed to probe driver even without
>> this regulator defined.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luk asz Majewski <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <[email protected]>
>
> I assume this one got superseeded by the same patch on your 30 patch
> series, right?
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2731031/
Yes right. In my re-structuring patch series this one is included.
>
>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in V2:
>> * Added log message in regulator_get failure as suggested by Sylwester.
>> * Used IS_ERR for checking regulator pointer as suggested by Sylwester.
>>
>> This patch is repost of the patch posted by Lukasz Majewski
>> (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2488211/). I have rebased this
>> patch on top of my TMU re-structured patch series
>> (http://lwn.net/Articles/548634/). Although I thought of handling
>> regulator as one type of feature (newly added) but could not do
>> so as regulator is a board/platform property and not SOC property so
>> leaving the device tree to define and handle it.
>>
>> .../devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt | 4 ++++
>> drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
>> index 970eeba..ff62f7a 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
>> @@ -14,6 +14,9 @@
>> - interrupts : Should contain interrupt for thermal system
>> - clocks : The main clock for TMU device
>> - clock-names : Thermal system clock name
>> +- vtmu-supply: This entry is optional and provides the regulator node supplying
>> + voltage to TMU. If needed this entry can be placed inside
>> + board/platform specific dts file.
>>
>> Example 1):
>>
>> @@ -25,6 +28,7 @@ Example 1):
>> clocks = <&clock 383>;
>> clock-names = "tmu_apbif";
>> status = "disabled";
>> + vtmu-supply = <&tmu_regulator_node>;
>> };
>>
>> Example 2):
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
>> index 72446c9..b7c609a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
>> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
>> #include <linux/of_address.h>
>> #include <linux/of_irq.h>
>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>> #include "exynos_thermal_common.h"
>> @@ -52,6 +53,7 @@
>> * @clk: pointer to the clock structure.
>> * @temp_error1: fused value of the first point trim.
>> * @temp_error2: fused value of the second point trim.
>> + * @regulator: pointer to the TMU regulator structure.
>> * @reg_conf: pointer to structure to register with core thermal.
>> */
>> struct exynos_tmu_data {
>> @@ -65,6 +67,7 @@ struct exynos_tmu_data {
>> struct mutex lock;
>> struct clk *clk;
>> u8 temp_error1, temp_error2;
>> + struct regulator *regulator;
>> struct thermal_sensor_conf *reg_conf;
>> };
>>
>> @@ -501,10 +504,23 @@ static int exynos_map_dt_data(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> struct exynos_tmu_data *data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> struct exynos_tmu_platform_data *pdata = data->pdata;
>> struct resource res;
>> + int ret;
>>
>> if (!data)
>> return -ENODEV;
>>
>> + /* Try enabling the regulator if found */
>> + data->regulator = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "vtmu");
>> + if (!IS_ERR(data->regulator)) {
>> + ret = regulator_enable(data->regulator);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to enable vtmu\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Regulator node (vtmu) not found\n");
>> + }
>> +
>> data->id = of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "tmuctrl");
>> if (data->id < 0)
>> data->id = 0;
>> @@ -669,6 +685,9 @@ static int exynos_tmu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> clk_unprepare(data->clk);
>>
>> + if (!IS_ERR(data->regulator))
>> + regulator_disable(data->regulator);
>> +
>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>>
>> return 0;
>>
>
>
> --
> You have got to be excited about what you are doing. (L. Lamport)
>
> Eduardo Valentin
>