2013-05-14 13:00:54

by Jiang Liu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/2] ACPI, PCI: remove unused global list acpi_pci_roots in pci_root.c

Now the global list acpi_pci_roots pci_root.c is useless, remove it.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <[email protected]>
Cc: Len Brown <[email protected]>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
---
drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 25 +++----------------------
include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
index b80e06e..91ddfd6 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
@@ -65,10 +65,6 @@ static struct acpi_scan_handler pci_root_handler = {
.detach = acpi_pci_root_remove,
};

-/* Lock to protect both acpi_pci_roots lists */
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_pci_root_lock);
-static LIST_HEAD(acpi_pci_roots);
-
static DEFINE_MUTEX(osc_lock);

/**
@@ -423,7 +419,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
}
}

- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&root->node);
root->device = device;
root->segment = segment & 0xFFFF;
strcpy(acpi_device_name(device), ACPI_PCI_ROOT_DEVICE_NAME);
@@ -501,10 +496,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
* TBD: Need PCI interface for enumeration/configuration of roots.
*/

- mutex_lock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
- list_add_tail(&root->node, &acpi_pci_roots);
- mutex_unlock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
-
/*
* Scan the Root Bridge
* --------------------
@@ -518,7 +509,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
"Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
result = -ENODEV;
- goto out_del_root;
+ goto end;
}

/* ASPM setting */
@@ -538,20 +529,13 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
if (system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING) {
pcibios_resource_survey_bus(root->bus);
pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(root->bus);
- }
-
- /* need to after hot-added ioapic is registered */
- if (system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING)
+ /* need to after hot-added ioapic is registered */
pci_enable_bridges(root->bus);
+ }

pci_bus_add_devices(root->bus);
return 1;

-out_del_root:
- mutex_lock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
- list_del(&root->node);
- mutex_unlock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
-
end:
kfree(root);
return result;
@@ -568,9 +552,6 @@ static void acpi_pci_root_remove(struct acpi_device *device)

pci_remove_root_bus(root->bus);

- mutex_lock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
- list_del(&root->node);
- mutex_unlock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
kfree(root);
}

diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
index 22ba56e..4eb9a88 100644
--- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
+++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
@@ -447,7 +447,6 @@ int register_acpi_bus_type(struct acpi_bus_type *);
int unregister_acpi_bus_type(struct acpi_bus_type *);

struct acpi_pci_root {
- struct list_head node;
struct acpi_device * device;
struct pci_bus *bus;
u16 segment;
--
1.8.1.2


2013-05-14 13:00:58

by Jiang Liu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/2] ACPI, pci_root: use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages

Use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages in pci_root.c.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <[email protected]>
Cc: Len Brown <[email protected]>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
---
drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
index 91ddfd6..21dda5a 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
@@ -379,23 +379,24 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
struct acpi_pci_root *root;
u32 flags, base_flags;
bool is_osc_granted = false;
+ acpi_handle handle = device->handle;

root = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_pci_root), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!root)
return -ENOMEM;

segment = 0;
- status = acpi_evaluate_integer(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
+ status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
&segment);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
- printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
+ acpi_handle_err(handle, "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
result = -ENODEV;
goto end;
}

/* Check _CRS first, then _BBN. If no _BBN, default to zero. */
root->secondary.flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
- status = try_get_root_bridge_busnr(device->handle, &root->secondary);
+ status = try_get_root_bridge_busnr(handle, &root->secondary);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
/*
* We need both the start and end of the downstream bus range
@@ -404,16 +405,16 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
* can do is assume [_BBN-0xFF] or [0-0xFF].
*/
root->secondary.end = 0xFF;
- printk(KERN_WARNING FW_BUG PREFIX
- "no secondary bus range in _CRS\n");
- status = acpi_evaluate_integer(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__BBN,
+ acpi_handle_warn(handle,
+ FW_BUG "no secondary bus range in _CRS\n");
+ status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, METHOD_NAME__BBN,
NULL, &bus);
if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
root->secondary.start = bus;
else if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND)
root->secondary.start = 0;
else {
- printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "can't evaluate _BBN\n");
+ acpi_handle_err(handle, "can't evaluate _BBN\n");
result = -ENODEV;
goto end;
}
@@ -425,11 +426,11 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
strcpy(acpi_device_class(device), ACPI_PCI_ROOT_CLASS);
device->driver_data = root;

- printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "%s [%s] (domain %04x %pR)\n",
+ pr_info(PREFIX "%s [%s] (domain %04x %pR)\n",
acpi_device_name(device), acpi_device_bid(device),
root->segment, &root->secondary);

- root->mcfg_addr = acpi_pci_root_get_mcfg_addr(device->handle);
+ root->mcfg_addr = acpi_pci_root_get_mcfg_addr(handle);

/*
* All supported architectures that use ACPI have support for
@@ -473,7 +474,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
dev_info(&device->dev,
"Requesting ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x)\n", flags);

- status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(device->handle, &flags,
+ status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(handle, &flags,
OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAP_STRUCTURE_CONTROL);
if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
is_osc_granted = true;
@@ -505,9 +506,9 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
*/
root->bus = pci_acpi_scan_root(root);
if (!root->bus) {
- printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX
- "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
- root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
+ acpi_handle_err(handle,
+ "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
+ root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
result = -ENODEV;
goto end;
}
@@ -517,8 +518,8 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM)
pcie_clear_aspm(root->bus);
} else {
- pr_info("ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, "
- "disabling ASPM\n");
+ acpi_handle_info(handle,
+ "ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM\n");
pcie_no_aspm();
}

@@ -571,12 +572,13 @@ static void handle_root_bridge_insertion(acpi_handle handle)
struct acpi_device *device;

if (!acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device)) {
- printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi device exists...\n");
+ acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
+ "acpi device exists...\n");
return;
}

if (acpi_bus_scan(handle))
- printk(KERN_ERR "cannot add bridge to acpi list\n");
+ acpi_handle_err(handle, "cannot add bridge to acpi list\n");
}

static void handle_root_bridge_removal(struct acpi_device *device)
@@ -602,7 +604,6 @@ static void handle_root_bridge_removal(struct acpi_device *device)
static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct acpi_pci_root *root;
- struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER };
struct acpi_hp_work *hp_work;
acpi_handle handle;
u32 type;
@@ -613,13 +614,11 @@ static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)

root = acpi_pci_find_root(handle);

- acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
-
switch (type) {
case ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK:
/* bus enumerate */
- printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Bus check notify on %s\n", __func__,
- (char *)buffer.pointer);
+ acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
+ "Bus check notify on %s\n", __func__);
if (!root)
handle_root_bridge_insertion(handle);

@@ -627,27 +626,26 @@ static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)

case ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK:
/* device check */
- printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Device check notify on %s\n", __func__,
- (char *)buffer.pointer);
+ acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
+ "Device check notify on %s\n", __func__);
if (!root)
handle_root_bridge_insertion(handle);
break;

case ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST:
/* request device eject */
- printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Device eject notify on %s\n", __func__,
- (char *)buffer.pointer);
+ acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
+ "Device eject notify on %s\n", __func__);
if (root)
handle_root_bridge_removal(root->device);
break;
default:
- printk(KERN_WARNING "notify_handler: unknown event type 0x%x for %s\n",
- type, (char *)buffer.pointer);
+ acpi_handle_warn(handle,
+ "notify_handler: unknown event type 0x%x\n", type);
break;
}

kfree(hp_work); /* allocated in handle_hotplug_event_bridge */
- kfree(buffer.pointer);
}

static void handle_hotplug_event_root(acpi_handle handle, u32 type,
@@ -661,9 +659,6 @@ static acpi_status __init
find_root_bridges(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
{
acpi_status status;
- char objname[64];
- struct acpi_buffer buffer = { .length = sizeof(objname),
- .pointer = objname };
int *count = (int *)context;

if (!acpi_is_root_bridge(handle))
@@ -671,16 +666,15 @@ find_root_bridges(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)

(*count)++;

- acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
-
status = acpi_install_notify_handler(handle, ACPI_SYSTEM_NOTIFY,
handle_hotplug_event_root, NULL);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
- printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi root: %s notify handler is not installed, exit status: %u\n",
- objname, (unsigned int)status);
+ acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
+ "notify handler is not installed, exit status: %u\n",
+ (unsigned int)status);
else
- printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi root: %s notify handler is installed\n",
- objname);
+ acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
+ "notify handler is installed\n");

return AE_OK;
}
--
1.8.1.2

2013-05-28 22:37:26

by Bjorn Helgaas

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] ACPI, PCI: remove unused global list acpi_pci_roots in pci_root.c

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Jiang Liu <[email protected]> wrote:
> Now the global list acpi_pci_roots pci_root.c is useless, remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <[email protected]>
> Cc: Len Brown <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> ---
> drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 25 +++----------------------
> include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

This and the "use acpi_handle_print()" patch look fine to me.

Rafael, I can take them, or if you want to take them yourself, you can add

Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>

Bjorn

> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> index b80e06e..91ddfd6 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -65,10 +65,6 @@ static struct acpi_scan_handler pci_root_handler = {
> .detach = acpi_pci_root_remove,
> };
>
> -/* Lock to protect both acpi_pci_roots lists */
> -static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_pci_root_lock);
> -static LIST_HEAD(acpi_pci_roots);
> -
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(osc_lock);
>
> /**
> @@ -423,7 +419,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> }
> }
>
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&root->node);
> root->device = device;
> root->segment = segment & 0xFFFF;
> strcpy(acpi_device_name(device), ACPI_PCI_ROOT_DEVICE_NAME);
> @@ -501,10 +496,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> * TBD: Need PCI interface for enumeration/configuration of roots.
> */
>
> - mutex_lock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> - list_add_tail(&root->node, &acpi_pci_roots);
> - mutex_unlock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> -
> /*
> * Scan the Root Bridge
> * --------------------
> @@ -518,7 +509,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
> root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
> result = -ENODEV;
> - goto out_del_root;
> + goto end;
> }
>
> /* ASPM setting */
> @@ -538,20 +529,13 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> if (system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING) {
> pcibios_resource_survey_bus(root->bus);
> pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(root->bus);
> - }
> -
> - /* need to after hot-added ioapic is registered */
> - if (system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING)
> + /* need to after hot-added ioapic is registered */
> pci_enable_bridges(root->bus);
> + }
>
> pci_bus_add_devices(root->bus);
> return 1;
>
> -out_del_root:
> - mutex_lock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> - list_del(&root->node);
> - mutex_unlock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> -
> end:
> kfree(root);
> return result;
> @@ -568,9 +552,6 @@ static void acpi_pci_root_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
>
> pci_remove_root_bus(root->bus);
>
> - mutex_lock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> - list_del(&root->node);
> - mutex_unlock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> kfree(root);
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> index 22ba56e..4eb9a88 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> @@ -447,7 +447,6 @@ int register_acpi_bus_type(struct acpi_bus_type *);
> int unregister_acpi_bus_type(struct acpi_bus_type *);
>
> struct acpi_pci_root {
> - struct list_head node;
> struct acpi_device * device;
> struct pci_bus *bus;
> u16 segment;
> --
> 1.8.1.2
>

2013-05-28 23:12:18

by Rafael J. Wysocki

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] ACPI, PCI: remove unused global list acpi_pci_roots in pci_root.c

On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 04:37:03 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Jiang Liu <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Now the global list acpi_pci_roots pci_root.c is useless, remove it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Len Brown <[email protected]>
> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 25 +++----------------------
> > include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 1 -
> > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> This and the "use acpi_handle_print()" patch look fine to me.
>
> Rafael, I can take them, or if you want to take them yourself, you can add
>
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>

OK, I'll take them.

Thanks,
Rafael


> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > index b80e06e..91ddfd6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > @@ -65,10 +65,6 @@ static struct acpi_scan_handler pci_root_handler = {
> > .detach = acpi_pci_root_remove,
> > };
> >
> > -/* Lock to protect both acpi_pci_roots lists */
> > -static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_pci_root_lock);
> > -static LIST_HEAD(acpi_pci_roots);
> > -
> > static DEFINE_MUTEX(osc_lock);
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -423,7 +419,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&root->node);
> > root->device = device;
> > root->segment = segment & 0xFFFF;
> > strcpy(acpi_device_name(device), ACPI_PCI_ROOT_DEVICE_NAME);
> > @@ -501,10 +496,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> > * TBD: Need PCI interface for enumeration/configuration of roots.
> > */
> >
> > - mutex_lock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> > - list_add_tail(&root->node, &acpi_pci_roots);
> > - mutex_unlock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> > -
> > /*
> > * Scan the Root Bridge
> > * --------------------
> > @@ -518,7 +509,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> > "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
> > root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
> > result = -ENODEV;
> > - goto out_del_root;
> > + goto end;
> > }
> >
> > /* ASPM setting */
> > @@ -538,20 +529,13 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> > if (system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING) {
> > pcibios_resource_survey_bus(root->bus);
> > pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(root->bus);
> > - }
> > -
> > - /* need to after hot-added ioapic is registered */
> > - if (system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING)
> > + /* need to after hot-added ioapic is registered */
> > pci_enable_bridges(root->bus);
> > + }
> >
> > pci_bus_add_devices(root->bus);
> > return 1;
> >
> > -out_del_root:
> > - mutex_lock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> > - list_del(&root->node);
> > - mutex_unlock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> > -
> > end:
> > kfree(root);
> > return result;
> > @@ -568,9 +552,6 @@ static void acpi_pci_root_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
> >
> > pci_remove_root_bus(root->bus);
> >
> > - mutex_lock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> > - list_del(&root->node);
> > - mutex_unlock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> > kfree(root);
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > index 22ba56e..4eb9a88 100644
> > --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > @@ -447,7 +447,6 @@ int register_acpi_bus_type(struct acpi_bus_type *);
> > int unregister_acpi_bus_type(struct acpi_bus_type *);
> >
> > struct acpi_pci_root {
> > - struct list_head node;
> > struct acpi_device * device;
> > struct pci_bus *bus;
> > u16 segment;
> > --
> > 1.8.1.2
> >
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

2013-05-28 23:39:55

by Rafael J. Wysocki

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] ACPI, PCI: remove unused global list acpi_pci_roots in pci_root.c

On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 01:21:08 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 04:37:03 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Jiang Liu <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Now the global list acpi_pci_roots pci_root.c is useless, remove it.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Len Brown <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > ---
> > > drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 25 +++----------------------
> > > include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 1 -
> > > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >
> > This and the "use acpi_handle_print()" patch look fine to me.
> >
> > Rafael, I can take them, or if you want to take them yourself, you can add
> >
> > Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
>
> OK, I'll take them.

Well, if I do that, there will be conflicts between our trees, so I think it's
better if you handle them.

Please add

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

to both.

Thanks,
Rafael


> > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > > index b80e06e..91ddfd6 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > > @@ -65,10 +65,6 @@ static struct acpi_scan_handler pci_root_handler = {
> > > .detach = acpi_pci_root_remove,
> > > };
> > >
> > > -/* Lock to protect both acpi_pci_roots lists */
> > > -static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_pci_root_lock);
> > > -static LIST_HEAD(acpi_pci_roots);
> > > -
> > > static DEFINE_MUTEX(osc_lock);
> > >
> > > /**
> > > @@ -423,7 +419,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&root->node);
> > > root->device = device;
> > > root->segment = segment & 0xFFFF;
> > > strcpy(acpi_device_name(device), ACPI_PCI_ROOT_DEVICE_NAME);
> > > @@ -501,10 +496,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> > > * TBD: Need PCI interface for enumeration/configuration of roots.
> > > */
> > >
> > > - mutex_lock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> > > - list_add_tail(&root->node, &acpi_pci_roots);
> > > - mutex_unlock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> > > -
> > > /*
> > > * Scan the Root Bridge
> > > * --------------------
> > > @@ -518,7 +509,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> > > "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
> > > root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
> > > result = -ENODEV;
> > > - goto out_del_root;
> > > + goto end;
> > > }
> > >
> > > /* ASPM setting */
> > > @@ -538,20 +529,13 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> > > if (system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING) {
> > > pcibios_resource_survey_bus(root->bus);
> > > pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(root->bus);
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - /* need to after hot-added ioapic is registered */
> > > - if (system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING)
> > > + /* need to after hot-added ioapic is registered */
> > > pci_enable_bridges(root->bus);
> > > + }
> > >
> > > pci_bus_add_devices(root->bus);
> > > return 1;
> > >
> > > -out_del_root:
> > > - mutex_lock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> > > - list_del(&root->node);
> > > - mutex_unlock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> > > -
> > > end:
> > > kfree(root);
> > > return result;
> > > @@ -568,9 +552,6 @@ static void acpi_pci_root_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
> > >
> > > pci_remove_root_bus(root->bus);
> > >
> > > - mutex_lock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> > > - list_del(&root->node);
> > > - mutex_unlock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> > > kfree(root);
> > > }
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > > index 22ba56e..4eb9a88 100644
> > > --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > > +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > > @@ -447,7 +447,6 @@ int register_acpi_bus_type(struct acpi_bus_type *);
> > > int unregister_acpi_bus_type(struct acpi_bus_type *);
> > >
> > > struct acpi_pci_root {
> > > - struct list_head node;
> > > struct acpi_device * device;
> > > struct pci_bus *bus;
> > > u16 segment;
> > > --
> > > 1.8.1.2
> > >
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

2013-05-30 17:34:04

by Bjorn Helgaas

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] ACPI, pci_root: use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 09:00:39PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> Use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages in pci_root.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <[email protected]>
> Cc: Len Brown <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> ---
> drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> index 91ddfd6..21dda5a 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -379,23 +379,24 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> struct acpi_pci_root *root;
> u32 flags, base_flags;
> bool is_osc_granted = false;
> + acpi_handle handle = device->handle;
>
> root = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_pci_root), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!root)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> segment = 0;
> - status = acpi_evaluate_integer(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
> + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
> &segment);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
> + acpi_handle_err(handle, "can't evaluate _SEG\n");

I previously acked this, but I noticed that we are making a mix of
dev_printk() and acpi_handle_printk() here. The difference is like this:

acpi PNP0A08:00: ACPI _OSC support notification failed, disabling PCIe ASPM
ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0: ACPI _OSC support notification failed, disabling PCIe ASPM

I'm not sure which direction we should go here, but I think we should
choose one or the other and use it consistently. Personally, I think the
internal DSDT names should be available *somewhere*, but not necessarily
used in run-of-the-mill chit-chat. For that reason, I prefer
dev_printk(), though I have the feeling that Rafael is moving toward
eliminating the struct acpi_device, so he might prefer
acpi_handle_printk().

Bjorn

> result = -ENODEV;
> goto end;
> }
>
> /* Check _CRS first, then _BBN. If no _BBN, default to zero. */
> root->secondary.flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
> - status = try_get_root_bridge_busnr(device->handle, &root->secondary);
> + status = try_get_root_bridge_busnr(handle, &root->secondary);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> /*
> * We need both the start and end of the downstream bus range
> @@ -404,16 +405,16 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> * can do is assume [_BBN-0xFF] or [0-0xFF].
> */
> root->secondary.end = 0xFF;
> - printk(KERN_WARNING FW_BUG PREFIX
> - "no secondary bus range in _CRS\n");
> - status = acpi_evaluate_integer(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__BBN,
> + acpi_handle_warn(handle,
> + FW_BUG "no secondary bus range in _CRS\n");
> + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, METHOD_NAME__BBN,
> NULL, &bus);
> if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
> root->secondary.start = bus;
> else if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND)
> root->secondary.start = 0;
> else {
> - printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "can't evaluate _BBN\n");
> + acpi_handle_err(handle, "can't evaluate _BBN\n");
> result = -ENODEV;
> goto end;
> }
> @@ -425,11 +426,11 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> strcpy(acpi_device_class(device), ACPI_PCI_ROOT_CLASS);
> device->driver_data = root;
>
> - printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "%s [%s] (domain %04x %pR)\n",
> + pr_info(PREFIX "%s [%s] (domain %04x %pR)\n",
> acpi_device_name(device), acpi_device_bid(device),
> root->segment, &root->secondary);
>
> - root->mcfg_addr = acpi_pci_root_get_mcfg_addr(device->handle);
> + root->mcfg_addr = acpi_pci_root_get_mcfg_addr(handle);
>
> /*
> * All supported architectures that use ACPI have support for
> @@ -473,7 +474,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> dev_info(&device->dev,
> "Requesting ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x)\n", flags);
>
> - status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(device->handle, &flags,
> + status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(handle, &flags,
> OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAP_STRUCTURE_CONTROL);
> if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
> is_osc_granted = true;
> @@ -505,9 +506,9 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> */
> root->bus = pci_acpi_scan_root(root);
> if (!root->bus) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX
> - "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
> - root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
> + acpi_handle_err(handle,
> + "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
> + root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
> result = -ENODEV;
> goto end;
> }
> @@ -517,8 +518,8 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM)
> pcie_clear_aspm(root->bus);
> } else {
> - pr_info("ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, "
> - "disabling ASPM\n");
> + acpi_handle_info(handle,
> + "ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM\n");
> pcie_no_aspm();
> }
>
> @@ -571,12 +572,13 @@ static void handle_root_bridge_insertion(acpi_handle handle)
> struct acpi_device *device;
>
> if (!acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device)) {
> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi device exists...\n");
> + acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> + "acpi device exists...\n");
> return;
> }
>
> if (acpi_bus_scan(handle))
> - printk(KERN_ERR "cannot add bridge to acpi list\n");
> + acpi_handle_err(handle, "cannot add bridge to acpi list\n");
> }
>
> static void handle_root_bridge_removal(struct acpi_device *device)
> @@ -602,7 +604,6 @@ static void handle_root_bridge_removal(struct acpi_device *device)
> static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> struct acpi_pci_root *root;
> - struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER };
> struct acpi_hp_work *hp_work;
> acpi_handle handle;
> u32 type;
> @@ -613,13 +614,11 @@ static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
>
> root = acpi_pci_find_root(handle);
>
> - acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
> -
> switch (type) {
> case ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK:
> /* bus enumerate */
> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Bus check notify on %s\n", __func__,
> - (char *)buffer.pointer);
> + acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> + "Bus check notify on %s\n", __func__);
> if (!root)
> handle_root_bridge_insertion(handle);
>
> @@ -627,27 +626,26 @@ static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
>
> case ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK:
> /* device check */
> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Device check notify on %s\n", __func__,
> - (char *)buffer.pointer);
> + acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> + "Device check notify on %s\n", __func__);
> if (!root)
> handle_root_bridge_insertion(handle);
> break;
>
> case ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST:
> /* request device eject */
> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Device eject notify on %s\n", __func__,
> - (char *)buffer.pointer);
> + acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> + "Device eject notify on %s\n", __func__);
> if (root)
> handle_root_bridge_removal(root->device);
> break;
> default:
> - printk(KERN_WARNING "notify_handler: unknown event type 0x%x for %s\n",
> - type, (char *)buffer.pointer);
> + acpi_handle_warn(handle,
> + "notify_handler: unknown event type 0x%x\n", type);
> break;
> }
>
> kfree(hp_work); /* allocated in handle_hotplug_event_bridge */
> - kfree(buffer.pointer);
> }
>
> static void handle_hotplug_event_root(acpi_handle handle, u32 type,
> @@ -661,9 +659,6 @@ static acpi_status __init
> find_root_bridges(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
> {
> acpi_status status;
> - char objname[64];
> - struct acpi_buffer buffer = { .length = sizeof(objname),
> - .pointer = objname };
> int *count = (int *)context;
>
> if (!acpi_is_root_bridge(handle))
> @@ -671,16 +666,15 @@ find_root_bridges(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
>
> (*count)++;
>
> - acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
> -
> status = acpi_install_notify_handler(handle, ACPI_SYSTEM_NOTIFY,
> handle_hotplug_event_root, NULL);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi root: %s notify handler is not installed, exit status: %u\n",
> - objname, (unsigned int)status);
> + acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> + "notify handler is not installed, exit status: %u\n",
> + (unsigned int)status);
> else
> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi root: %s notify handler is installed\n",
> - objname);
> + acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> + "notify handler is installed\n");
>
> return AE_OK;
> }
> --
> 1.8.1.2
>

2013-05-30 19:43:04

by Rafael J. Wysocki

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] ACPI, pci_root: use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages

On Thursday, May 30, 2013 11:33:56 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 09:00:39PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> > Use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages in pci_root.c.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Len Brown <[email protected]>
> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > index 91ddfd6..21dda5a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > @@ -379,23 +379,24 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> > struct acpi_pci_root *root;
> > u32 flags, base_flags;
> > bool is_osc_granted = false;
> > + acpi_handle handle = device->handle;
> >
> > root = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_pci_root), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!root)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > segment = 0;
> > - status = acpi_evaluate_integer(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
> > + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
> > &segment);
> > if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
> > - printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
> > + acpi_handle_err(handle, "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
>
> I previously acked this, but I noticed that we are making a mix of
> dev_printk() and acpi_handle_printk() here. The difference is like this:
>
> acpi PNP0A08:00: ACPI _OSC support notification failed, disabling PCIe ASPM
> ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0: ACPI _OSC support notification failed, disabling PCIe ASPM
>
> I'm not sure which direction we should go here, but I think we should
> choose one or the other and use it consistently. Personally, I think the
> internal DSDT names should be available *somewhere*, but not necessarily
> used in run-of-the-mill chit-chat. For that reason, I prefer
> dev_printk(), though I have the feeling that Rafael is moving toward
> eliminating the struct acpi_device, so he might prefer
> acpi_handle_printk().

I really don't care that much, but I agree that they should be used
consistently.

Thanks,
Rafael


> > result = -ENODEV;
> > goto end;
> > }
> >
> > /* Check _CRS first, then _BBN. If no _BBN, default to zero. */
> > root->secondary.flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
> > - status = try_get_root_bridge_busnr(device->handle, &root->secondary);
> > + status = try_get_root_bridge_busnr(handle, &root->secondary);
> > if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> > /*
> > * We need both the start and end of the downstream bus range
> > @@ -404,16 +405,16 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> > * can do is assume [_BBN-0xFF] or [0-0xFF].
> > */
> > root->secondary.end = 0xFF;
> > - printk(KERN_WARNING FW_BUG PREFIX
> > - "no secondary bus range in _CRS\n");
> > - status = acpi_evaluate_integer(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__BBN,
> > + acpi_handle_warn(handle,
> > + FW_BUG "no secondary bus range in _CRS\n");
> > + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, METHOD_NAME__BBN,
> > NULL, &bus);
> > if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
> > root->secondary.start = bus;
> > else if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND)
> > root->secondary.start = 0;
> > else {
> > - printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "can't evaluate _BBN\n");
> > + acpi_handle_err(handle, "can't evaluate _BBN\n");
> > result = -ENODEV;
> > goto end;
> > }
> > @@ -425,11 +426,11 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> > strcpy(acpi_device_class(device), ACPI_PCI_ROOT_CLASS);
> > device->driver_data = root;
> >
> > - printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "%s [%s] (domain %04x %pR)\n",
> > + pr_info(PREFIX "%s [%s] (domain %04x %pR)\n",
> > acpi_device_name(device), acpi_device_bid(device),
> > root->segment, &root->secondary);
> >
> > - root->mcfg_addr = acpi_pci_root_get_mcfg_addr(device->handle);
> > + root->mcfg_addr = acpi_pci_root_get_mcfg_addr(handle);
> >
> > /*
> > * All supported architectures that use ACPI have support for
> > @@ -473,7 +474,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> > dev_info(&device->dev,
> > "Requesting ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x)\n", flags);
> >
> > - status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(device->handle, &flags,
> > + status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(handle, &flags,
> > OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAP_STRUCTURE_CONTROL);
> > if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
> > is_osc_granted = true;
> > @@ -505,9 +506,9 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> > */
> > root->bus = pci_acpi_scan_root(root);
> > if (!root->bus) {
> > - printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX
> > - "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
> > - root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
> > + acpi_handle_err(handle,
> > + "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
> > + root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
> > result = -ENODEV;
> > goto end;
> > }
> > @@ -517,8 +518,8 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> > if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM)
> > pcie_clear_aspm(root->bus);
> > } else {
> > - pr_info("ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, "
> > - "disabling ASPM\n");
> > + acpi_handle_info(handle,
> > + "ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM\n");
> > pcie_no_aspm();
> > }
> >
> > @@ -571,12 +572,13 @@ static void handle_root_bridge_insertion(acpi_handle handle)
> > struct acpi_device *device;
> >
> > if (!acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device)) {
> > - printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi device exists...\n");
> > + acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> > + "acpi device exists...\n");
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > if (acpi_bus_scan(handle))
> > - printk(KERN_ERR "cannot add bridge to acpi list\n");
> > + acpi_handle_err(handle, "cannot add bridge to acpi list\n");
> > }
> >
> > static void handle_root_bridge_removal(struct acpi_device *device)
> > @@ -602,7 +604,6 @@ static void handle_root_bridge_removal(struct acpi_device *device)
> > static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
> > {
> > struct acpi_pci_root *root;
> > - struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER };
> > struct acpi_hp_work *hp_work;
> > acpi_handle handle;
> > u32 type;
> > @@ -613,13 +614,11 @@ static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
> >
> > root = acpi_pci_find_root(handle);
> >
> > - acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
> > -
> > switch (type) {
> > case ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK:
> > /* bus enumerate */
> > - printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Bus check notify on %s\n", __func__,
> > - (char *)buffer.pointer);
> > + acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> > + "Bus check notify on %s\n", __func__);
> > if (!root)
> > handle_root_bridge_insertion(handle);
> >
> > @@ -627,27 +626,26 @@ static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
> >
> > case ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK:
> > /* device check */
> > - printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Device check notify on %s\n", __func__,
> > - (char *)buffer.pointer);
> > + acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> > + "Device check notify on %s\n", __func__);
> > if (!root)
> > handle_root_bridge_insertion(handle);
> > break;
> >
> > case ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST:
> > /* request device eject */
> > - printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Device eject notify on %s\n", __func__,
> > - (char *)buffer.pointer);
> > + acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> > + "Device eject notify on %s\n", __func__);
> > if (root)
> > handle_root_bridge_removal(root->device);
> > break;
> > default:
> > - printk(KERN_WARNING "notify_handler: unknown event type 0x%x for %s\n",
> > - type, (char *)buffer.pointer);
> > + acpi_handle_warn(handle,
> > + "notify_handler: unknown event type 0x%x\n", type);
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > kfree(hp_work); /* allocated in handle_hotplug_event_bridge */
> > - kfree(buffer.pointer);
> > }
> >
> > static void handle_hotplug_event_root(acpi_handle handle, u32 type,
> > @@ -661,9 +659,6 @@ static acpi_status __init
> > find_root_bridges(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
> > {
> > acpi_status status;
> > - char objname[64];
> > - struct acpi_buffer buffer = { .length = sizeof(objname),
> > - .pointer = objname };
> > int *count = (int *)context;
> >
> > if (!acpi_is_root_bridge(handle))
> > @@ -671,16 +666,15 @@ find_root_bridges(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
> >
> > (*count)++;
> >
> > - acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
> > -
> > status = acpi_install_notify_handler(handle, ACPI_SYSTEM_NOTIFY,
> > handle_hotplug_event_root, NULL);
> > if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> > - printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi root: %s notify handler is not installed, exit status: %u\n",
> > - objname, (unsigned int)status);
> > + acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> > + "notify handler is not installed, exit status: %u\n",
> > + (unsigned int)status);
> > else
> > - printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi root: %s notify handler is installed\n",
> > - objname);
> > + acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> > + "notify handler is installed\n");
> >
> > return AE_OK;
> > }
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

2013-05-31 16:20:39

by Jiang Liu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] ACPI, pci_root: use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages

On Fri 31 May 2013 03:51:51 AM CST, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, May 30, 2013 11:33:56 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 09:00:39PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
>>> Use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages in pci_root.c.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: Len Brown <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>> ---
>>> drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
>>> index 91ddfd6..21dda5a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
>>> @@ -379,23 +379,24 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>>> struct acpi_pci_root *root;
>>> u32 flags, base_flags;
>>> bool is_osc_granted = false;
>>> + acpi_handle handle = device->handle;
>>>
>>> root = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_pci_root), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> if (!root)
>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>>
>>> segment = 0;
>>> - status = acpi_evaluate_integer(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
>>> + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
>>> &segment);
>>> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
>>> - printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
>>> + acpi_handle_err(handle, "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
>>
>> I previously acked this, but I noticed that we are making a mix of
>> dev_printk() and acpi_handle_printk() here. The difference is like this:
>>
>> acpi PNP0A08:00: ACPI _OSC support notification failed, disabling PCIe ASPM
>> ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0: ACPI _OSC support notification failed, disabling PCIe ASPM
>>
>> I'm not sure which direction we should go here, but I think we should
>> choose one or the other and use it consistently. Personally, I think the
>> internal DSDT names should be available *somewhere*, but not necessarily
>> used in run-of-the-mill chit-chat. For that reason, I prefer
>> dev_printk(), though I have the feeling that Rafael is moving toward
>> eliminating the struct acpi_device, so he might prefer
>> acpi_handle_printk().
>
> I really don't care that much, but I agree that they should be used
> consistently.
Hi Bjorn and Rafael,
I will work on this tomorrow. In some cases, only handle is
available, so we
could only use acpi_handle_printk(). So I think the directly may be:
use dev_printk()
if possible, otherwise use acpi_handle_printk() instead. Is that the
right way to go?
Regards!
Gerry

>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
>
>>> result = -ENODEV;
>>> goto end;
>>> }
>>>
>>> /* Check _CRS first, then _BBN. If no _BBN, default to zero. */
>>> root->secondary.flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
>>> - status = try_get_root_bridge_busnr(device->handle, &root->secondary);
>>> + status = try_get_root_bridge_busnr(handle, &root->secondary);
>>> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
>>> /*
>>> * We need both the start and end of the downstream bus range
>>> @@ -404,16 +405,16 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>>> * can do is assume [_BBN-0xFF] or [0-0xFF].
>>> */
>>> root->secondary.end = 0xFF;
>>> - printk(KERN_WARNING FW_BUG PREFIX
>>> - "no secondary bus range in _CRS\n");
>>> - status = acpi_evaluate_integer(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__BBN,
>>> + acpi_handle_warn(handle,
>>> + FW_BUG "no secondary bus range in _CRS\n");
>>> + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, METHOD_NAME__BBN,
>>> NULL, &bus);
>>> if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
>>> root->secondary.start = bus;
>>> else if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND)
>>> root->secondary.start = 0;
>>> else {
>>> - printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "can't evaluate _BBN\n");
>>> + acpi_handle_err(handle, "can't evaluate _BBN\n");
>>> result = -ENODEV;
>>> goto end;
>>> }
>>> @@ -425,11 +426,11 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>>> strcpy(acpi_device_class(device), ACPI_PCI_ROOT_CLASS);
>>> device->driver_data = root;
>>>
>>> - printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "%s [%s] (domain %04x %pR)\n",
>>> + pr_info(PREFIX "%s [%s] (domain %04x %pR)\n",
>>> acpi_device_name(device), acpi_device_bid(device),
>>> root->segment, &root->secondary);
>>>
>>> - root->mcfg_addr = acpi_pci_root_get_mcfg_addr(device->handle);
>>> + root->mcfg_addr = acpi_pci_root_get_mcfg_addr(handle);
>>>
>>> /*
>>> * All supported architectures that use ACPI have support for
>>> @@ -473,7 +474,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>>> dev_info(&device->dev,
>>> "Requesting ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x)\n", flags);
>>>
>>> - status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(device->handle, &flags,
>>> + status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(handle, &flags,
>>> OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAP_STRUCTURE_CONTROL);
>>> if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
>>> is_osc_granted = true;
>>> @@ -505,9 +506,9 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>>> */
>>> root->bus = pci_acpi_scan_root(root);
>>> if (!root->bus) {
>>> - printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX
>>> - "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
>>> - root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
>>> + acpi_handle_err(handle,
>>> + "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
>>> + root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
>>> result = -ENODEV;
>>> goto end;
>>> }
>>> @@ -517,8 +518,8 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>>> if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM)
>>> pcie_clear_aspm(root->bus);
>>> } else {
>>> - pr_info("ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, "
>>> - "disabling ASPM\n");
>>> + acpi_handle_info(handle,
>>> + "ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM\n");
>>> pcie_no_aspm();
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -571,12 +572,13 @@ static void handle_root_bridge_insertion(acpi_handle handle)
>>> struct acpi_device *device;
>>>
>>> if (!acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device)) {
>>> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi device exists...\n");
>>> + acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
>>> + "acpi device exists...\n");
>>> return;
>>> }
>>>
>>> if (acpi_bus_scan(handle))
>>> - printk(KERN_ERR "cannot add bridge to acpi list\n");
>>> + acpi_handle_err(handle, "cannot add bridge to acpi list\n");
>>> }
>>>
>>> static void handle_root_bridge_removal(struct acpi_device *device)
>>> @@ -602,7 +604,6 @@ static void handle_root_bridge_removal(struct acpi_device *device)
>>> static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
>>> {
>>> struct acpi_pci_root *root;
>>> - struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER };
>>> struct acpi_hp_work *hp_work;
>>> acpi_handle handle;
>>> u32 type;
>>> @@ -613,13 +614,11 @@ static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
>>>
>>> root = acpi_pci_find_root(handle);
>>>
>>> - acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
>>> -
>>> switch (type) {
>>> case ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK:
>>> /* bus enumerate */
>>> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Bus check notify on %s\n", __func__,
>>> - (char *)buffer.pointer);
>>> + acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
>>> + "Bus check notify on %s\n", __func__);
>>> if (!root)
>>> handle_root_bridge_insertion(handle);
>>>
>>> @@ -627,27 +626,26 @@ static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
>>>
>>> case ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK:
>>> /* device check */
>>> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Device check notify on %s\n", __func__,
>>> - (char *)buffer.pointer);
>>> + acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
>>> + "Device check notify on %s\n", __func__);
>>> if (!root)
>>> handle_root_bridge_insertion(handle);
>>> break;
>>>
>>> case ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST:
>>> /* request device eject */
>>> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Device eject notify on %s\n", __func__,
>>> - (char *)buffer.pointer);
>>> + acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
>>> + "Device eject notify on %s\n", __func__);
>>> if (root)
>>> handle_root_bridge_removal(root->device);
>>> break;
>>> default:
>>> - printk(KERN_WARNING "notify_handler: unknown event type 0x%x for %s\n",
>>> - type, (char *)buffer.pointer);
>>> + acpi_handle_warn(handle,
>>> + "notify_handler: unknown event type 0x%x\n", type);
>>> break;
>>> }
>>>
>>> kfree(hp_work); /* allocated in handle_hotplug_event_bridge */
>>> - kfree(buffer.pointer);
>>> }
>>>
>>> static void handle_hotplug_event_root(acpi_handle handle, u32 type,
>>> @@ -661,9 +659,6 @@ static acpi_status __init
>>> find_root_bridges(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
>>> {
>>> acpi_status status;
>>> - char objname[64];
>>> - struct acpi_buffer buffer = { .length = sizeof(objname),
>>> - .pointer = objname };
>>> int *count = (int *)context;
>>>
>>> if (!acpi_is_root_bridge(handle))
>>> @@ -671,16 +666,15 @@ find_root_bridges(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
>>>
>>> (*count)++;
>>>
>>> - acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
>>> -
>>> status = acpi_install_notify_handler(handle, ACPI_SYSTEM_NOTIFY,
>>> handle_hotplug_event_root, NULL);
>>> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>>> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi root: %s notify handler is not installed, exit status: %u\n",
>>> - objname, (unsigned int)status);
>>> + acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
>>> + "notify handler is not installed, exit status: %u\n",
>>> + (unsigned int)status);
>>> else
>>> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi root: %s notify handler is installed\n",
>>> - objname);
>>> + acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
>>> + "notify handler is installed\n");
>>>
>>> return AE_OK;
>>> }
>>

2013-05-31 19:18:56

by Bjorn Helgaas

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] ACPI, pci_root: use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages

On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Jiang Liu <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri 31 May 2013 03:51:51 AM CST, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Thursday, May 30, 2013 11:33:56 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 09:00:39PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
>>>> Use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages in pci_root.c.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <[email protected]>
>>>> Cc: Len Brown <[email protected]>
>>>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
>>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
>>>> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
>>>> index 91ddfd6..21dda5a 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
>>>> @@ -379,23 +379,24 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>>>> struct acpi_pci_root *root;
>>>> u32 flags, base_flags;
>>>> bool is_osc_granted = false;
>>>> + acpi_handle handle = device->handle;
>>>>
>>>> root = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_pci_root), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> if (!root)
>>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>>>
>>>> segment = 0;
>>>> - status = acpi_evaluate_integer(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
>>>> + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
>>>> &segment);
>>>> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
>>>> - printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
>>>> + acpi_handle_err(handle, "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
>>>
>>> I previously acked this, but I noticed that we are making a mix of
>>> dev_printk() and acpi_handle_printk() here. The difference is like this:
>>>
>>> acpi PNP0A08:00: ACPI _OSC support notification failed, disabling PCIe ASPM
>>> ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0: ACPI _OSC support notification failed, disabling PCIe ASPM
>>>
>>> I'm not sure which direction we should go here, but I think we should
>>> choose one or the other and use it consistently. Personally, I think the
>>> internal DSDT names should be available *somewhere*, but not necessarily
>>> used in run-of-the-mill chit-chat. For that reason, I prefer
>>> dev_printk(), though I have the feeling that Rafael is moving toward
>>> eliminating the struct acpi_device, so he might prefer
>>> acpi_handle_printk().
>>
>> I really don't care that much, but I agree that they should be used
>> consistently.
> Hi Bjorn and Rafael,
> I will work on this tomorrow. In some cases, only handle is
> available, so we
> could only use acpi_handle_printk(). So I think the directly may be:
> use dev_printk()
> if possible, otherwise use acpi_handle_printk() instead. Is that the
> right way to go?

That sounds good to me.

Bjorn