In __iommu_get_pages(), the cpu_addr is checked wheather in
atomic_pool range or not. So if the cpu_addr is in atomic_pool
range, it does not need to check twice.
Signed-off-by: YoungJun Cho <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
index ef3e0f3..1d158c2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
@@ -1372,16 +1372,17 @@ static int arm_iommu_mmap_attrs(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
void arm_iommu_free_attrs(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
dma_addr_t handle, struct dma_attrs *attrs)
{
- struct page **pages = __iommu_get_pages(cpu_addr, attrs);
+ struct page **pages;
size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
- if (!pages) {
- WARN(1, "trying to free invalid coherent area: %p\n", cpu_addr);
+ if (__in_atomic_pool(cpu_addr, size)) {
+ __iommu_free_atomic(dev, cpu_addr, handle, size);
return;
}
- if (__in_atomic_pool(cpu_addr, size)) {
- __iommu_free_atomic(dev, cpu_addr, handle, size);
+ pages = __iommu_get_pages(cpu_addr, attrs);
+ if (!pages) {
+ WARN(1, "trying to free invalid coherent area: %p\n", cpu_addr);
return;
}
--
1.7.4.1
YoungJun Cho <[email protected]> wrote @ Mon, 17 Jun 2013 06:18:52 +0200:
> In __iommu_get_pages(), the cpu_addr is checked wheather in
> atomic_pool range or not. So if the cpu_addr is in atomic_pool
> range, it does not need to check twice.
>
> Signed-off-by: YoungJun Cho <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <[email protected]>
Looks ok to me, at least.