Use standard PM state macros PCI_Dx instead of numeric 0/1/2..
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <[email protected]>
Cc: Forest Bond <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
Cc: Devendra Naga <[email protected]>
Cc :Joe Perches <[email protected]>
Cc: Marcos Paulo de Souza <[email protected]>
Cc: Bill Pemberton <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
---
drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c b/drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c
index 08b250f..7f36a71 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c
@@ -3370,8 +3370,8 @@ viawget_resume(struct pci_dev *pcid)
PSMgmtObject pMgmt = pDevice->pMgmt;
int power_status; // to silence the compiler
- power_status = pci_set_power_state(pcid, 0);
- power_status = pci_enable_wake(pcid, 0, 0);
+ power_status = pci_set_power_state(pcid, PCI_D0);
+ power_status = pci_enable_wake(pcid, PCI_D0, 0);
pci_restore_state(pcid);
if (netif_running(pDevice->dev)) {
spin_lock_irq(&pDevice->lock);
--
1.7.1
ping...?
On 2013/6/27 20:57, Yijing Wang wrote:
> Use standard PM state macros PCI_Dx instead of numeric 0/1/2..
>
> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <[email protected]>
> Cc: Forest Bond <[email protected]>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
> Cc: Devendra Naga <[email protected]>
> Cc :Joe Perches <[email protected]>
> Cc: Marcos Paulo de Souza <[email protected]>
> Cc: Bill Pemberton <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> ---
> drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c b/drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c
> index 08b250f..7f36a71 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c
> @@ -3370,8 +3370,8 @@ viawget_resume(struct pci_dev *pcid)
> PSMgmtObject pMgmt = pDevice->pMgmt;
> int power_status; // to silence the compiler
>
> - power_status = pci_set_power_state(pcid, 0);
> - power_status = pci_enable_wake(pcid, 0, 0);
> + power_status = pci_set_power_state(pcid, PCI_D0);
> + power_status = pci_enable_wake(pcid, PCI_D0, 0);
> pci_restore_state(pcid);
> if (netif_running(pDevice->dev)) {
> spin_lock_irq(&pDevice->lock);
>
--
Thanks!
Yijing
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 09:14:06AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
> ping...?
You are asking yourself the status of a patch? Interesting...
> On 2013/6/27 20:57, Yijing Wang wrote:
You sent this after I closed my staging tree, so it will be applied
after 3.11-rc1 is out, don't worry, it's not lost.
thanks,
greg k-h
On 2013/7/2 9:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 09:14:06AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
>> ping...?
>
> You are asking yourself the status of a patch? Interesting...
>
>> On 2013/6/27 20:57, Yijing Wang wrote:
>
> You sent this after I closed my staging tree, so it will be applied
> after 3.11-rc1 is out, don't worry, it's not lost.
Hi Greg,
I get it, thanks for your reply.
Thanks!
Yijing.
> .
>
--
Thanks!
Yijing