From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <[email protected]>
Make sure client drivers will still build on systems
without reset control support.
Signed-off-by: Ivan T. Ivanov <[email protected]>
Cc: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephen Warren <[email protected]>
Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]>
Cc: Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
---
include/linux/reset.h | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/reset.h b/include/linux/reset.h
index 6082247..0df3e30 100644
--- a/include/linux/reset.h
+++ b/include/linux/reset.h
@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
struct device;
struct reset_control;
+#if defined(CONFIG_RESET_CONTROLLER)
+
int reset_control_reset(struct reset_control *rstc);
int reset_control_assert(struct reset_control *rstc);
int reset_control_deassert(struct reset_control *rstc);
@@ -14,4 +16,46 @@ struct reset_control *devm_reset_control_get(struct device *dev, const char *id)
int device_reset(struct device *dev);
+#else /* !CONFIG_RESET_CONTROLLER */
+
+/*
+ * Make sure client drivers will still build on systems without
+ * reset control support.
+ */
+static inline int reset_control_reset(struct reset_control *rstc)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int reset_control_assert(struct reset_control *rstc)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int reset_control_deassert(struct reset_control *rstc)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline struct reset_control *
+reset_control_get(struct device *dev, const char *id)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline void reset_control_put(struct reset_control *rstc){}
+
+static inline struct reset_control *
+devm_reset_control_get(struct device *dev, const char *id)
+{
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static inline int device_reset(struct device *dev)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+#endif
+
#endif
--
1.7.9.5
Hi Ivan,
Am Donnerstag, den 10.10.2013, 12:14 +0300 schrieb Ivan T. Ivanov:
> From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <[email protected]>
>
> Make sure client drivers will still build on systems
> without reset control support.
the stubs should at least return errors, but then this turns a compile
time error into a runtime error for devices that don't work without
being properly reset.
Please also refer to this thread:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-June/174758.html
regards
Philipp
> Signed-off-by: Ivan T. Ivanov <[email protected]>
> Cc: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
> Cc: Stephen Warren <[email protected]>
> Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]>
> Cc: Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
> ---
> include/linux/reset.h | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/reset.h b/include/linux/reset.h
> index 6082247..0df3e30 100644
> --- a/include/linux/reset.h
> +++ b/include/linux/reset.h
> @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
> struct device;
> struct reset_control;
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_RESET_CONTROLLER)
> +
> int reset_control_reset(struct reset_control *rstc);
> int reset_control_assert(struct reset_control *rstc);
> int reset_control_deassert(struct reset_control *rstc);
> @@ -14,4 +16,46 @@ struct reset_control *devm_reset_control_get(struct device *dev, const char *id)
>
> int device_reset(struct device *dev);
>
> +#else /* !CONFIG_RESET_CONTROLLER */
> +
> +/*
> + * Make sure client drivers will still build on systems without
> + * reset control support.
> + */
> +static inline int reset_control_reset(struct reset_control *rstc)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int reset_control_assert(struct reset_control *rstc)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int reset_control_deassert(struct reset_control *rstc)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct reset_control *
> +reset_control_get(struct device *dev, const char *id)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void reset_control_put(struct reset_control *rstc){}
> +
> +static inline struct reset_control *
> +devm_reset_control_get(struct device *dev, const char *id)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int device_reset(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#endif
> +
> #endif
Hi,
On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 11:51 +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 10.10.2013, 12:14 +0300 schrieb Ivan T. Ivanov:
> > From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <[email protected]>
> >
> > Make sure client drivers will still build on systems
> > without reset control support.
>
> the stubs should at least return errors, but then this turns a compile
> time error into a runtime error for devices that don't work without
> being properly reset.
>
> Please also refer to this thread:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-June/174758.html
>
I have missed this one. Is there conclusion on the topic? I have
followed approach taken by clock and regulator consumer API.
Regards,
Ivan
> regards
> Philipp
>