2013-10-22 01:50:01

by Freddy Xin

Subject: [PATCH 1/1] [PATCH resubmit] ax88179_178a: Correct the RX error definition in RX header

From: Freddy Xin <[email protected]>

Correct the definition of AX_RXHDR_CRC_ERR and
AX_RXHDR_DROP_ERR. They are BIT29 and BIT31 in pkt_hdr
seperately.

Signed-off-by: Freddy Xin <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/usb/ax88179_178a.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/ax88179_178a.c b/drivers/net/usb/ax88179_178a.c
index 3569293..3bcd0d9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/usb/ax88179_178a.c
+++ b/drivers/net/usb/ax88179_178a.c
@@ -36,8 +36,8 @@
#define AX_RXHDR_L4_TYPE_TCP 16
#define AX_RXHDR_L3CSUM_ERR 2
#define AX_RXHDR_L4CSUM_ERR 1
-#define AX_RXHDR_CRC_ERR ((u32)BIT(31))
-#define AX_RXHDR_DROP_ERR ((u32)BIT(30))
+#define AX_RXHDR_CRC_ERR ((u32)BIT(29))
+#define AX_RXHDR_DROP_ERR ((u32)BIT(31))
#define AX_ACCESS_MAC 0x01
#define AX_ACCESS_PHY 0x02
#define AX_ACCESS_EEPROM 0x04
--
1.7.10.4

2013-10-22 06:15:50

by David Miller

Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] [PATCH resubmit] ax88179_178a: Correct the RX error definition in RX header

Submit these, not individually as single patches, but as a patch set,
the first one with subject "[PATCH 1/2]" and the second with
subject "[PATCH 2/2]"

You have to do this, because it is absolutely essentially to let
me know which patch gets applies first and which one gets applied
second. The two patches are to the same file, so if you don't
tell me the order, they won't apply cleanly at all.