2014-01-06 20:15:37

by John W. Linville

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] wl1251 patches from linux-n900 tree

On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 10:47:29AM +0100, Pali Roh?r wrote:
> On Sunday 08 December 2013 10:24:58 Pali Roh?r wrote:
> > Hello, I'm sending wl1251 patches from linux-n900 tree [1] for
> > comments. More patches come from David's monitor & packet
> > injection work. Patches are tested with 3.12 rc5 kernel on
> > Nokia N900.
> >
> > Second version contains new patch for fixing NULL pointer
> > dereference which sometimes cause kernel panic and fixes code
> > suggested by Pavel Machek.

> So far, there are no new comments for patches 01, 03-13 and 16.
> Are there any other problems with that patches or can be accepted
> for upstream?

They are probably fine to merge now. Of course, I was still deleting
wl12xx patches when they were originally posted, so I'll need someone
to resend the patches to me...

John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
[email protected] might be all we have. Be ready.


2014-01-06 20:26:15

by Johannes Berg

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] wl1251 patches from linux-n900 tree

On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 15:00 -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 10:47:29AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Sunday 08 December 2013 10:24:58 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > Hello, I'm sending wl1251 patches from linux-n900 tree [1] for
> > > comments. More patches come from David's monitor & packet
> > > injection work. Patches are tested with 3.12 rc5 kernel on
> > > Nokia N900.
> > >
> > > Second version contains new patch for fixing NULL pointer
> > > dereference which sometimes cause kernel panic and fixes code
> > > suggested by Pavel Machek.
>
> > So far, there are no new comments for patches 01, 03-13 and 16.
> > Are there any other problems with that patches or can be accepted
> > for upstream?
>
> They are probably fine to merge now. Of course, I was still deleting
> wl12xx patches when they were originally posted, so I'll need someone
> to resend the patches to me...

But please please don't CC half the world again!

johannes

2014-01-06 22:03:09

by Pavel Machek

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] wl1251 patches from linux-n900 tree

Hi!

> > > Hello, I'm sending wl1251 patches from linux-n900 tree [1] for
> > > comments. More patches come from David's monitor & packet
> > > injection work. Patches are tested with 3.12 rc5 kernel on
> > > Nokia N900.
> > >
> > > Second version contains new patch for fixing NULL pointer
> > > dereference which sometimes cause kernel panic and fixes code
> > > suggested by Pavel Machek.
>
> > So far, there are no new comments for patches 01, 03-13 and 16.
> > Are there any other problems with that patches or can be accepted
> > for upstream?
>
> They are probably fine to merge now. Of course, I was still deleting
> wl12xx patches when they were originally posted, so I'll need someone
> to resend the patches to me...

I'll try to help with that (Pali has his development machine under
repairs), but I'll have to hunt it in archives, too...

--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

2014-01-07 12:15:15

by Pavel Machek

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] wl1251 patches from linux-n900 tree

Hi!

> > > Second version contains new patch for fixing NULL pointer
> > > dereference which sometimes cause kernel panic and fixes code
> > > suggested by Pavel Machek.
>
> > So far, there are no new comments for patches 01, 03-13 and 16.
> > Are there any other problems with that patches or can be accepted
> > for upstream?
>
> They are probably fine to merge now. Of course, I was still deleting
> wl12xx patches when they were originally posted, so I'll need someone
> to resend the patches to me...

Patches should be in your inbox now, with subjects "[PATCH v3 13/13]
wl1251:". I hand selected patches 01, 03-13 and 16. I was doing
forwarding by hand, sorry for extra (fwd) in 06/13.

Best regards,
Pavel

--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

2014-01-16 00:21:24

by Pavel Machek

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] wl1251 patches from linux-n900 tree

On Mon 2014-01-06 15:00:50, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 10:47:29AM +0100, Pali Roh?r wrote:
> > On Sunday 08 December 2013 10:24:58 Pali Roh?r wrote:
> > > Hello, I'm sending wl1251 patches from linux-n900 tree [1] for
> > > comments. More patches come from David's monitor & packet
> > > injection work. Patches are tested with 3.12 rc5 kernel on
> > > Nokia N900.
> > >
> > > Second version contains new patch for fixing NULL pointer
> > > dereference which sometimes cause kernel panic and fixes code
> > > suggested by Pavel Machek.
>
> > So far, there are no new comments for patches 01, 03-13 and 16.
> > Are there any other problems with that patches or can be accepted
> > for upstream?
>
> They are probably fine to merge now. Of course, I was still deleting
> wl12xx patches when they were originally posted, so I'll need someone
> to resend the patches to me...

Ping? Did they get merged? Did you receive the patches?

Regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

2014-01-16 20:30:32

by John W. Linville

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] wl1251 patches from linux-n900 tree

On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 01:21:21AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2014-01-06 15:00:50, John W. Linville wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 10:47:29AM +0100, Pali Roh?r wrote:
> > > On Sunday 08 December 2013 10:24:58 Pali Roh?r wrote:
> > > > Hello, I'm sending wl1251 patches from linux-n900 tree [1] for
> > > > comments. More patches come from David's monitor & packet
> > > > injection work. Patches are tested with 3.12 rc5 kernel on
> > > > Nokia N900.
> > > >
> > > > Second version contains new patch for fixing NULL pointer
> > > > dereference which sometimes cause kernel panic and fixes code
> > > > suggested by Pavel Machek.
> >
> > > So far, there are no new comments for patches 01, 03-13 and 16.
> > > Are there any other problems with that patches or can be accepted
> > > for upstream?
> >
> > They are probably fine to merge now. Of course, I was still deleting
> > wl12xx patches when they were originally posted, so I'll need someone
> > to resend the patches to me...
>
> Ping? Did they get merged? Did you receive the patches?

They are already available in wireless-next.

--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
[email protected] might be all we have. Be ready.