These sentences are not proper English due to the typos. I had initially caught
one of them while trying to understand the regmap feature, and then I just ran
the vim spell checker, and went through all the items that would need to be
fixed for this header file.
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp <[email protected]>
---
include/linux/regmap.h | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/regmap.h b/include/linux/regmap.h
index e559078..1f6643c 100644
--- a/include/linux/regmap.h
+++ b/include/linux/regmap.h
@@ -122,9 +122,9 @@ typedef void (*regmap_unlock)(void *);
* volatile_table (see below) is not, the check is performed on
* such table (a register is volatile if it belongs to one of
* the ranges specified by volatile_table).
- * @precious_reg: Optional callback returning true if the rgister
+ * @precious_reg: Optional callback returning true if the register
* should not be read outside of a call from the driver
- * (eg, a clear on read interrupt status register). If this
+ * (e.g., a clear on read interrupt status register). If this
* field is NULL but precious_table (see below) is not, the
* check is performed on such table (a register is precious if
* it belongs to one of the ranges specified by precious_table).
@@ -136,9 +136,9 @@ typedef void (*regmap_unlock)(void *);
* are not overridden).
* @reg_read: Optional callback that if filled will be used to perform
* all the reads from the registers. Should only be provided for
- * devices whos read operation cannot be represented as a simple read
- * operation on a bus such as SPI, I2C, etc. Most of the devices do
- * not need this.
+ * devices whose read operation cannot be represented as a simple
+ * read operation on a bus such as SPI, I2C, etc. Most of the
+ * devices do not need this.
* @reg_write: Same as above for writing.
* @fast_io: Register IO is fast. Use a spinlock instead of a mutex
* to perform locking. This field is ignored if custom lock/unlock
--
1.8.5.1
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 02:13:41PM +0000, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> These sentences are not proper English due to the typos. I had initially caught
> one of them while trying to understand the regmap feature, and then I just ran
> the vim spell checker, and went through all the items that would need to be
> fixed for this header file.
Applied, please do use subject lines consistent with the subsystem.