On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 04:20:00PM -0800, David Cohen wrote:
> This patch removes the unnecessary enum for platform type to handle the
> array of pdatas. We can set pdata directly to pci_device_id struct
> instead.
Ping. comments here? :)
Br, David Cohen
>
> Signed-off-by: David Cohen <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/intel_scu_ipc.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_scu_ipc.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_scu_ipc.c
> index 60ea476a9130..259969d31055 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_scu_ipc.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_scu_ipc.c
> @@ -62,13 +62,6 @@
> #define IPC_RWBUF_SIZE 20 /* IPC Read buffer Size */
> #define IPC_IOC 0x100 /* IPC command register IOC bit */
>
> -enum {
> - SCU_IPC_LINCROFT,
> - SCU_IPC_PENWELL,
> - SCU_IPC_CLOVERVIEW,
> - SCU_IPC_TANGIER,
> -};
> -
> /* intel scu ipc driver data*/
> struct intel_scu_ipc_pdata_t {
> u32 ipc_base;
> @@ -78,35 +71,29 @@ struct intel_scu_ipc_pdata_t {
> u8 irq_mode;
> };
>
> -static struct intel_scu_ipc_pdata_t intel_scu_ipc_pdata[] = {
> - [SCU_IPC_LINCROFT] = {
> - .ipc_base = 0xff11c000,
> - .i2c_base = 0xff12b000,
> - .ipc_len = 0x100,
> - .i2c_len = 0x10,
> - .irq_mode = 0,
> - },
> - [SCU_IPC_PENWELL] = {
> - .ipc_base = 0xff11c000,
> - .i2c_base = 0xff12b000,
> - .ipc_len = 0x100,
> - .i2c_len = 0x10,
> - .irq_mode = 1,
> - },
> - [SCU_IPC_CLOVERVIEW] = {
> - .ipc_base = 0xff11c000,
> - .i2c_base = 0xff12b000,
> - .ipc_len = 0x100,
> - .i2c_len = 0x10,
> - .irq_mode = 1,
> - },
> - [SCU_IPC_TANGIER] = {
> - .ipc_base = 0xff009000,
> - .i2c_base = 0xff00d000,
> - .ipc_len = 0x100,
> - .i2c_len = 0x10,
> - .irq_mode = 0,
> - },
> +static struct intel_scu_ipc_pdata_t intel_scu_ipc_lincroft_pdata = {
> + .ipc_base = 0xff11c000,
> + .i2c_base = 0xff12b000,
> + .ipc_len = 0x100,
> + .i2c_len = 0x10,
> + .irq_mode = 0,
> +};
> +
> +/* Penwell and Cloverview */
> +static struct intel_scu_ipc_pdata_t intel_scu_ipc_penwell_pdata = {
> + .ipc_base = 0xff11c000,
> + .i2c_base = 0xff12b000,
> + .ipc_len = 0x100,
> + .i2c_len = 0x10,
> + .irq_mode = 1,
> +};
> +
> +static struct intel_scu_ipc_pdata_t intel_scu_ipc_tangier_pdata = {
> + .ipc_base = 0xff009000,
> + .i2c_base = 0xff00d000,
> + .ipc_len = 0x100,
> + .i2c_len = 0x10,
> + .irq_mode = 0,
> };
>
> static int ipc_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id);
> @@ -583,15 +570,14 @@ static irqreturn_t ioc(int irq, void *dev_id)
> */
> static int ipc_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> {
> - int err, pid;
> + int err;
> struct intel_scu_ipc_pdata_t *pdata;
> resource_size_t pci_resource;
>
> if (ipcdev.pdev) /* We support only one SCU */
> return -EBUSY;
>
> - pid = id->driver_data;
> - pdata = &intel_scu_ipc_pdata[pid];
> + pdata = (struct intel_scu_ipc_pdata_t *)id->driver_data;
>
> ipcdev.pdev = pci_dev_get(dev);
> ipcdev.irq_mode = pdata->irq_mode;
> @@ -650,11 +636,21 @@ static void ipc_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> }
>
> static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(pci_ids) = {
> - {PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x082a), SCU_IPC_LINCROFT},
> - {PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x080e), SCU_IPC_PENWELL},
> - {PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x08ea), SCU_IPC_CLOVERVIEW},
> - {PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x11a0), SCU_IPC_TANGIER},
> - { 0,}
> + {
> + PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x082a),
> + (kernel_ulong_t)&intel_scu_ipc_lincroft_pdata,
> + }, {
> + PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x080e),
> + (kernel_ulong_t)&intel_scu_ipc_penwell_pdata,
> + }, {
> + PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x08ea),
> + (kernel_ulong_t)&intel_scu_ipc_penwell_pdata,
> + }, {
> + PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x11a0),
> + (kernel_ulong_t)&intel_scu_ipc_tangier_pdata,
> + }, {
> + 0,
> + }
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, pci_ids);
>
> --
> 1.8.4.2
On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 14:57 -0800, David Cohen wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 04:20:00PM -0800, David Cohen wrote:
> > This patch removes the unnecessary enum for platform type to handle the
> > array of pdatas. We can set pdata directly to pci_device_id struct
> > instead.
>
> Ping. comments here? :)
These look fine. Thanks, David!
--
Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay?ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m????????????I?