From: Shaibal Dutta <[email protected]>
Garbage collector work does not have to be bound to the CPU that scheduled
it. By moving work to the power-efficient workqueue, the selection of
CPU executing the work is left to the scheduler. This extends idle
residency times and conserves power.
This functionality is enabled when CONFIG_WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT is selected.
Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov <[email protected]>
Cc: James Morris <[email protected]>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <[email protected]>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Shaibal Dutta <[email protected]>
[[email protected]: Rebased to latest kernel version. Added
commit message.]
Signed-off-by: Zoran Markovic <[email protected]>
---
net/ipv4/inetpeer.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inetpeer.c b/net/ipv4/inetpeer.c
index 48f4244..87155aa 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inetpeer.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inetpeer.c
@@ -161,7 +161,8 @@ static void inetpeer_gc_worker(struct work_struct *work)
list_splice(&list, &gc_list);
spin_unlock_bh(&gc_lock);
- schedule_delayed_work(&gc_work, gc_delay);
+ queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq,
+ &gc_work, gc_delay);
}
/* Called from ip_output.c:ip_init */
@@ -576,7 +577,8 @@ static void inetpeer_inval_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
list_add_tail(&p->gc_list, &gc_list);
spin_unlock_bh(&gc_lock);
- schedule_delayed_work(&gc_work, gc_delay);
+ queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq,
+ &gc_work, gc_delay);
}
void inetpeer_invalidate_tree(struct inet_peer_base *base)
--
1.7.9.5
Hello.
On 31-01-2014 3:40, Zoran Markovic wrote:
> From: Shaibal Dutta <[email protected]>
> Garbage collector work does not have to be bound to the CPU that scheduled
> it. By moving work to the power-efficient workqueue, the selection of
> CPU executing the work is left to the scheduler. This extends idle
> residency times and conserves power.
> This functionality is enabled when CONFIG_WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT is selected.
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
> Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov <[email protected]>
> Cc: James Morris <[email protected]>
> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <[email protected]>
> Cc: Patrick McHardy <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Shaibal Dutta <[email protected]>
> [[email protected]: Rebased to latest kernel version. Added
> commit message.]
> Signed-off-by: Zoran Markovic <[email protected]>
> ---
> net/ipv4/inetpeer.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/inetpeer.c b/net/ipv4/inetpeer.c
> index 48f4244..87155aa 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/inetpeer.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/inetpeer.c
> @@ -161,7 +161,8 @@ static void inetpeer_gc_worker(struct work_struct *work)
> list_splice(&list, &gc_list);
> spin_unlock_bh(&gc_lock);
>
> - schedule_delayed_work(&gc_work, gc_delay);
> + queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq,
> + &gc_work, gc_delay);
Please align the continuation line under the next character after ( on the
broken up line.
> @@ -576,7 +577,8 @@ static void inetpeer_inval_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
> list_add_tail(&p->gc_list, &gc_list);
> spin_unlock_bh(&gc_lock);
>
> - schedule_delayed_work(&gc_work, gc_delay);
> + queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq,
> + &gc_work, gc_delay);
Same here. This is according to networking coding style.
WBR, Sergei