2014-06-01 08:00:40

by Yann Droneaud

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core/platform: remove unused implicit padding in platform_object

Hi Dan,

Le samedi 31 mai 2014 à 15:05 +0300, Dan Carpenter a écrit :
> On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:01:39AM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote:
> > Le vendredi 30 mai 2014 à 23:10 +0300, Dan Carpenter a écrit :
> > > This changelog doesn't match the patch.
> > >
> >
> > Hum, let me guess .... I've failed to set the proper subject prefix
> > to add v6 suffic to PATCH:
> > I've changed the patch title since v5 (from Emil Goode)... so it's like
> > a new one.
> >
> > Is it really necessary to resend the patch ?
>
> Oh. Sorry, I didn't understand what you were trying to say... You're
> right.
>

Sorry about that.

If it's unclear, I should modify the commit message.

> For some reason I just looked at the patch first and then I started
> reading the changelog and got to the bit about GCC on ARM and said
> thought have been describing a different change without reading the
> rest. This was my bad. I should have read more carefully.
>
> Very thourough patch description. :)
>

Thank you.

Regards.

--
Yann Droneaud
OPTEYA


2014-06-01 17:47:35

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core/platform: remove unused implicit padding in platform_object

On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 10:00:16AM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Le samedi 31 mai 2014 ? 15:05 +0300, Dan Carpenter a ?crit :
> > On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:01:39AM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote:
> > > Le vendredi 30 mai 2014 ? 23:10 +0300, Dan Carpenter a ?crit :
> > > > This changelog doesn't match the patch.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hum, let me guess .... I've failed to set the proper subject prefix
> > > to add v6 suffic to PATCH:
> > > I've changed the patch title since v5 (from Emil Goode)... so it's like
> > > a new one.
> > >
> > > Is it really necessary to resend the patch ?
> >
> > Oh. Sorry, I didn't understand what you were trying to say... You're
> > right.
> >
>
> Sorry about that.
>
> If it's unclear, I should modify the commit message.

Nah, it looks good, I'll queue it up this week, thanks.

greg k-h

2014-06-02 08:38:01

by Dan Carpenter

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core/platform: remove unused implicit padding in platform_object

On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 10:00:16AM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Le samedi 31 mai 2014 ? 15:05 +0300, Dan Carpenter a ?crit :
> > On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:01:39AM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote:
> > > Le vendredi 30 mai 2014 ? 23:10 +0300, Dan Carpenter a ?crit :
> > > > This changelog doesn't match the patch.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hum, let me guess .... I've failed to set the proper subject prefix
> > > to add v6 suffic to PATCH:
> > > I've changed the patch title since v5 (from Emil Goode)... so it's like
> > > a new one.
> > >
> > > Is it really necessary to resend the patch ?
> >
> > Oh. Sorry, I didn't understand what you were trying to say... You're
> > right.
> >
>
> Sorry about that.
>
> If it's unclear, I should modify the commit message.

It's clear. Sorry that was my bad.

regards,
dan carpenter