2014-06-12 17:48:21

by L. Alberto Giménez

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] staging: rtl8172u: Make ieee80211_crypto_init static

Fix sparse warning.

Signed-off-by: L. Alberto Giménez <[email protected]>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt.c
index 5533221..3be690d 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt.c
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static struct ieee80211_crypto_ops ieee80211_crypt_null = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
};

-int __init ieee80211_crypto_init(void)
+static int __init ieee80211_crypto_init(void)
{
int ret = -ENOMEM;

--
2.0.0.rc0


2014-06-20 00:10:27

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8172u: Make ieee80211_crypto_init static

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 07:40:49PM +0200, L. Alberto Gim?nez wrote:
> Fix sparse warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: L. Alberto Gim?nez <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt.c
> index 5533221..3be690d 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt.c
> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static struct ieee80211_crypto_ops ieee80211_crypt_null = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> };
>
> -int __init ieee80211_crypto_init(void)
> +static int __init ieee80211_crypto_init(void)
> {
> int ret = -ENOMEM;

You obviously did not compile this change :(

greg k-h

2014-06-21 10:04:53

by L. Alberto Giménez

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8172u: Make ieee80211_crypto_init static

On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 05:14:26PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 07:40:49PM +0200, L. Alberto Giménez wrote:
> > Fix sparse warning.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: L. Alberto Giménez <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt.c
> > index 5533221..3be690d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt.c
> > @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static struct ieee80211_crypto_ops ieee80211_crypt_null = {
> > .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > };
> >
> > -int __init ieee80211_crypto_init(void)
> > +static int __init ieee80211_crypto_init(void)
> > {
> > int ret = -ENOMEM;
>
> You obviously did not compile this change :(
>
> greg k-h

Hi Greg,

I'm very sorry for that, I swear I compiled it, but clearly I'm missing something
here.

My patch compiles with a warning, but tag v3.15 (tag where my branch is based) does
not issue this warning:

drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt.c:203:19: warning:
‘ieee80211_crypto_init’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
static int __init ieee80211_crypto_init(void)
^

I thought that __init functions could be static, is there any problem with that? Care
to shed some light here?

Thank you very much
--
L. Alberto Giménez
GnuPG key ID 0xDD4E27AB

2014-06-21 20:16:59

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8172u: Make ieee80211_crypto_init static

On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 12:04:44PM +0200, L. Alberto Giménez wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 05:14:26PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 07:40:49PM +0200, L. Alberto Giménez wrote:
> > > Fix sparse warning.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: L. Alberto Giménez <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt.c
> > > index 5533221..3be690d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt.c
> > > @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static struct ieee80211_crypto_ops ieee80211_crypt_null = {
> > > .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > > };
> > >
> > > -int __init ieee80211_crypto_init(void)
> > > +static int __init ieee80211_crypto_init(void)
> > > {
> > > int ret = -ENOMEM;
> >
> > You obviously did not compile this change :(
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> I'm very sorry for that, I swear I compiled it, but clearly I'm missing something
> here.
>
> My patch compiles with a warning, but tag v3.15 (tag where my branch is based) does
> not issue this warning:
>
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt.c:203:19: warning:
> ‘ieee80211_crypto_init’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> static int __init ieee80211_crypto_init(void)
> ^
>
> I thought that __init functions could be static, is there any problem with that? Care
> to shed some light here?

That function is called by a different file, it can not be static, I
don't know how you were able to successfully build the driver with your
change...