inline this one line function used in driver_info structure
Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
Cc: Emil Goode <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/usb/asix_devices.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/asix_devices.c b/drivers/net/usb/asix_devices.c
index 8a7582b..a41926a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/usb/asix_devices.c
+++ b/drivers/net/usb/asix_devices.c
@@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ static int ax88772_bind(struct usbnet *dev, struct usb_interface *intf)
return 0;
}
-static void ax88772_unbind(struct usbnet *dev, struct usb_interface *intf)
+static inline void ax88772_unbind(struct usbnet *dev, struct usb_interface *intf)
{
kfree(dev->driver_priv);
}
--
1.8.4.5
Hello.
On 06/21/2014 12:40 AM, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> inline this one line function used in driver_info structure
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
> Cc: Emil Goode <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/net/usb/asix_devices.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/asix_devices.c b/drivers/net/usb/asix_devices.c
> index 8a7582b..a41926a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/usb/asix_devices.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/asix_devices.c
> @@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ static int ax88772_bind(struct usbnet *dev, struct usb_interface *intf)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void ax88772_unbind(struct usbnet *dev, struct usb_interface *intf)
> +static inline void ax88772_unbind(struct usbnet *dev, struct usb_interface *intf)
> {
> kfree(dev->driver_priv);
> }
gcc is perfectly capable of figuring that out. No need to use *inline*
outside the *.h files.
WBR, Sergei
On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 22:40 +0200, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> inline this one line function used in driver_info structure
That precisely is this the reason not to inline this.
It is used as a function pointer. gcc must generate
a non-inlined version of the function.
Your patch has zero effect and suggests something that is
actually wrong.
Regards
Oliver