2014-07-08 00:45:56

by Laura Abbott

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] of: Use proper types for checking memory overflow

Commit a67a6ed15513541579d38bcbd127e7be170710e5
(of: Check for phys_addr_t overflows in early_init_dt_add_memory_arch)
corrected early_init_dt_add_memory_arch to account for overflows
but did so in an unclean way using ULONG_MAX. There is no
guarantee that sizeof(unsigned long) == sizeof(phys_addr_t).
Check against phys_addr_t instead.

Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <[email protected]>
---
drivers/of/fdt.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c
index b777d8f..b88a68e 100644
--- a/drivers/of/fdt.c
+++ b/drivers/of/fdt.c
@@ -875,24 +875,24 @@ int __init early_init_dt_scan_chosen(unsigned long node, const char *uname,
}

#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK
+#define MAX_PHYS_ADDR ((phys_addr_t)~0)
+
void __init __weak early_init_dt_add_memory_arch(u64 base, u64 size)
{
const u64 phys_offset = __pa(PAGE_OFFSET);
base &= PAGE_MASK;
size &= PAGE_MASK;

- if (sizeof(phys_addr_t) < sizeof(u64)) {
- if (base > ULONG_MAX) {
- pr_warning("Ignoring memory block 0x%llx - 0x%llx\n",
- base, base + size);
- return;
- }
+ if (base > MAX_PHYS_ADDR) {
+ pr_warning("Ignoring memory block 0x%llx - 0x%llx\n",
+ base, base + size);
+ return;
+ }

- if (base + size > ULONG_MAX) {
- pr_warning("Ignoring memory range 0x%lx - 0x%llx\n",
- ULONG_MAX, base + size);
- size = ULONG_MAX - base;
- }
+ if (base + size > MAX_PHYS_ADDR) {
+ pr_warning("Ignoring memory range 0x%lx - 0x%llx\n",
+ ULONG_MAX, base + size);
+ size = MAX_PHYS_ADDR - base;
}

if (base + size < phys_offset) {
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation


2014-07-08 07:15:38

by Geert Uytterhoeven

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Use proper types for checking memory overflow

On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 2:45 AM, Laura Abbott <[email protected]> wrote:
> Commit a67a6ed15513541579d38bcbd127e7be170710e5
> (of: Check for phys_addr_t overflows in early_init_dt_add_memory_arch)
> corrected early_init_dt_add_memory_arch to account for overflows
> but did so in an unclean way using ULONG_MAX. There is no
> guarantee that sizeof(unsigned long) == sizeof(phys_addr_t).
> Check against phys_addr_t instead.

Thanks!

> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <[email protected]>

Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds

2014-07-08 07:26:08

by Nicolas Pitre

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Use proper types for checking memory overflow

On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, Laura Abbott wrote:

> Commit a67a6ed15513541579d38bcbd127e7be170710e5
> (of: Check for phys_addr_t overflows in early_init_dt_add_memory_arch)
> corrected early_init_dt_add_memory_arch to account for overflows
> but did so in an unclean way using ULONG_MAX. There is no
> guarantee that sizeof(unsigned long) == sizeof(phys_addr_t).
> Check against phys_addr_t instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <[email protected]>

> ---
> drivers/of/fdt.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> index b777d8f..b88a68e 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/fdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> @@ -875,24 +875,24 @@ int __init early_init_dt_scan_chosen(unsigned long node, const char *uname,
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK
> +#define MAX_PHYS_ADDR ((phys_addr_t)~0)
> +
> void __init __weak early_init_dt_add_memory_arch(u64 base, u64 size)
> {
> const u64 phys_offset = __pa(PAGE_OFFSET);
> base &= PAGE_MASK;
> size &= PAGE_MASK;
>
> - if (sizeof(phys_addr_t) < sizeof(u64)) {
> - if (base > ULONG_MAX) {
> - pr_warning("Ignoring memory block 0x%llx - 0x%llx\n",
> - base, base + size);
> - return;
> - }
> + if (base > MAX_PHYS_ADDR) {
> + pr_warning("Ignoring memory block 0x%llx - 0x%llx\n",
> + base, base + size);
> + return;
> + }
>
> - if (base + size > ULONG_MAX) {
> - pr_warning("Ignoring memory range 0x%lx - 0x%llx\n",
> - ULONG_MAX, base + size);
> - size = ULONG_MAX - base;
> - }
> + if (base + size > MAX_PHYS_ADDR) {
> + pr_warning("Ignoring memory range 0x%lx - 0x%llx\n",
> + ULONG_MAX, base + size);
> + size = MAX_PHYS_ADDR - base;
> }
>
> if (base + size < phys_offset) {
> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> hosted by The Linux Foundation
>
>

2014-07-11 05:25:23

by Grant Likely

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Use proper types for checking memory overflow

On Tue, 8 Jul 2014 09:24:08 +0200 (CEST), Nicolas Pitre <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, Laura Abbott wrote:
>
> > Commit a67a6ed15513541579d38bcbd127e7be170710e5
> > (of: Check for phys_addr_t overflows in early_init_dt_add_memory_arch)
> > corrected early_init_dt_add_memory_arch to account for overflows
> > but did so in an unclean way using ULONG_MAX. There is no
> > guarantee that sizeof(unsigned long) == sizeof(phys_addr_t).
> > Check against phys_addr_t instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <[email protected]>
>
> Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <[email protected]>

Applied, thanks.

g.

>
> > ---
> > drivers/of/fdt.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> > index b777d8f..b88a68e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/of/fdt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> > @@ -875,24 +875,24 @@ int __init early_init_dt_scan_chosen(unsigned long node, const char *uname,
> > }
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK
> > +#define MAX_PHYS_ADDR ((phys_addr_t)~0)
> > +
> > void __init __weak early_init_dt_add_memory_arch(u64 base, u64 size)
> > {
> > const u64 phys_offset = __pa(PAGE_OFFSET);
> > base &= PAGE_MASK;
> > size &= PAGE_MASK;
> >
> > - if (sizeof(phys_addr_t) < sizeof(u64)) {
> > - if (base > ULONG_MAX) {
> > - pr_warning("Ignoring memory block 0x%llx - 0x%llx\n",
> > - base, base + size);
> > - return;
> > - }
> > + if (base > MAX_PHYS_ADDR) {
> > + pr_warning("Ignoring memory block 0x%llx - 0x%llx\n",
> > + base, base + size);
> > + return;
> > + }
> >
> > - if (base + size > ULONG_MAX) {
> > - pr_warning("Ignoring memory range 0x%lx - 0x%llx\n",
> > - ULONG_MAX, base + size);
> > - size = ULONG_MAX - base;
> > - }
> > + if (base + size > MAX_PHYS_ADDR) {
> > + pr_warning("Ignoring memory range 0x%lx - 0x%llx\n",
> > + ULONG_MAX, base + size);
> > + size = MAX_PHYS_ADDR - base;
> > }
> >
> > if (base + size < phys_offset) {
> > --
> > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> > hosted by The Linux Foundation
> >
> >