2014-07-31 10:12:47

by Peter Ujfalusi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: edma: Do not change the error code returned from edma_alloc_slot

In case of edma_alloc_slot() failure during probe we should return the error
unchanged to make debugging easier.

Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <[email protected]>
---
drivers/dma/edma.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/edma.c b/drivers/dma/edma.c
index 69f1f5250120..2953de0f53f3 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/edma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/edma.c
@@ -1048,7 +1048,7 @@ static int edma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
ecc->dummy_slot = edma_alloc_slot(ecc->ctlr, EDMA_SLOT_ANY);
if (ecc->dummy_slot < 0) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can't allocate PaRAM dummy slot\n");
- return -EIO;
+ return ecc->dummy_slot;
}

dma_cap_zero(ecc->dma_slave.cap_mask);
--
2.0.2


2014-07-31 10:12:55

by Peter Ujfalusi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] dmaengine: edma: Do not register second device when booted with DT

DT boot does not yet support more than one edma device. To avoid issues at
runtime we should not register the second device when the kernel is booted
with DT.

Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <[email protected]>
---
drivers/dma/edma.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/edma.c b/drivers/dma/edma.c
index 2953de0f53f3..d99351361fcb 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/edma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/edma.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>

#include <linux/platform_data/edma.h>

@@ -1133,7 +1134,7 @@ static int edma_init(void)
}
}

- if (EDMA_CTLRS == 2) {
+ if (!of_have_populated_dt() && EDMA_CTLRS == 2) {
pdev1 = platform_device_register_full(&edma_dev_info1);
if (IS_ERR(pdev1)) {
platform_driver_unregister(&edma_driver);
--
2.0.2

2014-07-31 12:07:07

by Vinod Koul

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: edma: Do not change the error code returned from edma_alloc_slot

On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 01:12:37PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> In case of edma_alloc_slot() failure during probe we should return the error
> unchanged to make debugging easier.

Applied both

Thanks

--
~Vinod