lirc_imon.c and lirc_sasem.c contain an incoming_packet method that
is using deprecated printk's. Removed blocks replacing with single
dev_info with a %*ph format instead.
Signed-off-by: Amber Thrall <[email protected]>
---
drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_imon.c | 10 ++--------
drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_sasem.c | 10 ++--------
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_imon.c b/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_imon.c
index 7aca44f..232edd5 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_imon.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_imon.c
@@ -606,7 +606,6 @@ static void imon_incoming_packet(struct imon_context *context,
struct device *dev = context->driver->dev;
int octet, bit;
unsigned char mask;
- int i;
/*
* just bail out if no listening IR client
@@ -620,13 +619,8 @@ static void imon_incoming_packet(struct imon_context *context,
return;
}
- if (debug) {
- dev_info(dev, "raw packet: ");
- for (i = 0; i < len; ++i)
- printk("%02x ", buf[i]);
- printk("\n");
- }
-
+ if (debug)
+ dev_info(dev, "raw packet: %*ph\n", len, buf);
/*
* Translate received data to pulse and space lengths.
* Received data is active low, i.e. pulses are 0 and
diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_sasem.c b/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_sasem.c
index c20ef56..2f0463e 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_sasem.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_sasem.c
@@ -573,7 +573,6 @@ static void incoming_packet(struct sasem_context *context,
unsigned char *buf = urb->transfer_buffer;
long ms;
struct timeval tv;
- int i;
if (len != 8) {
dev_warn(&context->dev->dev,
@@ -582,13 +581,8 @@ static void incoming_packet(struct sasem_context *context,
return;
}
- if (debug) {
- printk(KERN_INFO "Incoming data: ");
- for (i = 0; i < 8; ++i)
- printk(KERN_CONT "%02x ", buf[i]);
- printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
- }
-
+ if (debug)
+ dev_info(&context->dev->dev, "Incoming data: %*ph\n", len, buf);
/*
* Lirc could deal with the repeat code, but we really need to block it
* if it arrives too late. Otherwise we could repeat the wrong code.
--
2.1.2