This change switches to managed resource APIs to allocated resources
such as irq, clock. Hence does away with release statements of the
same resorces in error lables and remove function.
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <[email protected]>
Cc: Zhang Rui <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav <[email protected]>
---
Change since v1:
Passing struct device to devm_clk_get was missing. Fix the same in v2.
drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c | 46 +++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
index 634b6ce..22013ef 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
@@ -1060,7 +1060,7 @@ static int ti_bandgap_tshut_init(struct ti_bandgap *bgp,
int status;
/* Request for gpio_86 line */
- status = gpio_request(gpio_nr, "tshut");
+ status = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, gpio_nr, "tshut");
if (status < 0) {
dev_err(bgp->dev, "Could not request for TSHUT GPIO:%i\n", 86);
return status;
@@ -1071,11 +1071,12 @@ static int ti_bandgap_tshut_init(struct ti_bandgap *bgp,
return status;
}
- status = request_irq(gpio_to_irq(gpio_nr), ti_bandgap_tshut_irq_handler,
- IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, "tshut", NULL);
+ status = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, gpio_to_irq(gpio_nr),
+ ti_bandgap_tshut_irq_handler,
+ IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, "tshut", NULL);
if (status) {
- gpio_free(gpio_nr);
dev_err(bgp->dev, "request irq failed for TSHUT");
+ return status;
}
return 0;
@@ -1104,7 +1105,7 @@ static int ti_bandgap_talert_init(struct ti_bandgap *bgp,
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "get_irq failed\n");
return bgp->irq;
}
- ret = request_threaded_irq(bgp->irq, NULL,
+ ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, bgp->irq, NULL,
ti_bandgap_talert_irq_handler,
IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH | IRQF_ONESHOT,
"talert", bgp);
@@ -1212,21 +1213,17 @@ int ti_bandgap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
}
- bgp->fclock = clk_get(NULL, bgp->conf->fclock_name);
- ret = IS_ERR(bgp->fclock);
- if (ret) {
+ bgp->fclock = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL, bgp->conf->fclock_name);
+ if (IS_ERR(bgp->fclock)) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request fclock reference\n");
- ret = PTR_ERR(bgp->fclock);
- goto free_irqs;
+ return PTR_ERR(bgp->fclock);
}
- bgp->div_clk = clk_get(NULL, bgp->conf->div_ck_name);
- ret = IS_ERR(bgp->div_clk);
- if (ret) {
+ bgp->div_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL, bgp->conf->div_ck_name);
+ if (IS_ERR(bgp->div_clk)) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev,
"failed to request div_ts_ck clock ref\n");
- ret = PTR_ERR(bgp->div_clk);
- goto free_irqs;
+ return PTR_ERR(bgp->div_clk);
}
for (i = 0; i < bgp->conf->sensor_count; i++) {
@@ -1251,7 +1248,6 @@ int ti_bandgap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
clk_rate <= 0) {
ret = -ENODEV;
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "wrong clock rate (%d)\n", clk_rate);
- goto put_clks;
}
ret = clk_set_rate(bgp->div_clk, clk_rate);
@@ -1357,14 +1353,6 @@ remove_sensors:
disable_clk:
if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS(bgp, CLK_CTRL))
clk_disable_unprepare(bgp->fclock);
-put_clks:
- clk_put(bgp->fclock);
- clk_put(bgp->div_clk);
-free_irqs:
- if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS(bgp, TSHUT)) {
- free_irq(gpio_to_irq(bgp->tshut_gpio), NULL);
- gpio_free(bgp->tshut_gpio);
- }
return ret;
}
@@ -1388,16 +1376,6 @@ int ti_bandgap_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS(bgp, CLK_CTRL))
clk_disable_unprepare(bgp->fclock);
- clk_put(bgp->fclock);
- clk_put(bgp->div_clk);
-
- if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS(bgp, TALERT))
- free_irq(bgp->irq, bgp);
-
- if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS(bgp, TSHUT)) {
- free_irq(gpio_to_irq(bgp->tshut_gpio), NULL);
- gpio_free(bgp->tshut_gpio);
- }
return 0;
}
--
1.7.9.5
On 07.10.2014 10:11, Pramod Gurav wrote:
> This change switches to managed resource APIs to allocated resources
> such as irq, clock. Hence does away with release statements of the
> same resorces in error lables and remove function.
>
> Cc: Eduardo Valentin<[email protected]>
> Cc: Zhang Rui<[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav<[email protected]>
> ---
> Change since v1:
>
> Passing struct device to devm_clk_get was missing. Fix the same in v2.
>
> drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c | 46 +++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
> index 634b6ce..22013ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
> @@ -1060,7 +1060,7 @@ static int ti_bandgap_tshut_init(struct ti_bandgap *bgp,
> int status;
>
> /* Request for gpio_86 line */
> - status = gpio_request(gpio_nr, "tshut");
> + status = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, gpio_nr, "tshut");
> if (status< 0) {
> dev_err(bgp->dev, "Could not request for TSHUT GPIO:%i\n", 86);
> return status;
> @@ -1071,11 +1071,12 @@ static int ti_bandgap_tshut_init(struct ti_bandgap *bgp,
> return status;
> }
>
> - status = request_irq(gpio_to_irq(gpio_nr), ti_bandgap_tshut_irq_handler,
> - IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, "tshut", NULL);
> + status = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, gpio_to_irq(gpio_nr),
> + ti_bandgap_tshut_irq_handler,
> + IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, "tshut", NULL);
> if (status) {
> - gpio_free(gpio_nr);
> dev_err(bgp->dev, "request irq failed for TSHUT");
> + return status;
> }
>
> return 0;
Remove two more lines:
if (status)
dev_err(bgp->dev, "request irq failed for TSHUT");
return status;
> @@ -1104,7 +1105,7 @@ static int ti_bandgap_talert_init(struct ti_bandgap *bgp,
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "get_irq failed\n");
> return bgp->irq;
> }
> - ret = request_threaded_irq(bgp->irq, NULL,
> + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, bgp->irq, NULL,
> ti_bandgap_talert_irq_handler,
> IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> "talert", bgp);
> @@ -1212,21 +1213,17 @@ int ti_bandgap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
> }
>
> - bgp->fclock = clk_get(NULL, bgp->conf->fclock_name);
> - ret = IS_ERR(bgp->fclock);
> - if (ret) {
> + bgp->fclock = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL, bgp->conf->fclock_name);
> + if (IS_ERR(bgp->fclock)) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request fclock reference\n");
> - ret = PTR_ERR(bgp->fclock);
> - goto free_irqs;
> + return PTR_ERR(bgp->fclock);
> }
>
> - bgp->div_clk = clk_get(NULL, bgp->conf->div_ck_name);
> - ret = IS_ERR(bgp->div_clk);
> - if (ret) {
> + bgp->div_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL, bgp->conf->div_ck_name);
> + if (IS_ERR(bgp->div_clk)) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> "failed to request div_ts_ck clock ref\n");
> - ret = PTR_ERR(bgp->div_clk);
> - goto free_irqs;
> + return PTR_ERR(bgp->div_clk);
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i< bgp->conf->sensor_count; i++) {
> @@ -1251,7 +1248,6 @@ int ti_bandgap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> clk_rate<= 0) {
> ret = -ENODEV;
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "wrong clock rate (%d)\n", clk_rate);
> - goto put_clks;
> }
>
> ret = clk_set_rate(bgp->div_clk, clk_rate);
Fallback, rewriting ret value and attempting to set wrong clk_rate?
> @@ -1357,14 +1353,6 @@ remove_sensors:
> disable_clk:
> if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS(bgp, CLK_CTRL))
> clk_disable_unprepare(bgp->fclock);
> -put_clks:
> - clk_put(bgp->fclock);
> - clk_put(bgp->div_clk);
> -free_irqs:
> - if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS(bgp, TSHUT)) {
> - free_irq(gpio_to_irq(bgp->tshut_gpio), NULL);
> - gpio_free(bgp->tshut_gpio);
> - }
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -1388,16 +1376,6 @@ int ti_bandgap_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS(bgp, CLK_CTRL))
> clk_disable_unprepare(bgp->fclock);
> - clk_put(bgp->fclock);
> - clk_put(bgp->div_clk);
> -
> - if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS(bgp, TALERT))
> - free_irq(bgp->irq, bgp);
> -
> - if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS(bgp, TSHUT)) {
> - free_irq(gpio_to_irq(bgp->tshut_gpio), NULL);
> - gpio_free(bgp->tshut_gpio);
> - }
>
> return 0;
> }
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 2:50 AM, Vladimir Zapolskiy <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 07.10.2014 10:11, Pramod Gurav wrote:
>>
>> This change switches to managed resource APIs to allocated resources
>> such as irq, clock. Hence does away with release statements of the
>> same resorces in error lables and remove function.
>>
>> Cc: Eduardo Valentin<[email protected]>
>> Cc: Zhang Rui<[email protected]>
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav<[email protected]>
>> ---
>> Change since v1:
>>
>> Passing struct device to devm_clk_get was missing. Fix the same in v2.
>>
>> drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c | 46
>> +++++++--------------------
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
>> b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
>> index 634b6ce..22013ef 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
>> @@ -1060,7 +1060,7 @@ static int ti_bandgap_tshut_init(struct ti_bandgap
>> *bgp,
>> int status;
>>
>> /* Request for gpio_86 line */
>> - status = gpio_request(gpio_nr, "tshut");
>> + status = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, gpio_nr, "tshut");
>> if (status< 0) {
>> dev_err(bgp->dev, "Could not request for TSHUT GPIO:%i\n",
>> 86);
>> return status;
>> @@ -1071,11 +1071,12 @@ static int ti_bandgap_tshut_init(struct ti_bandgap
>> *bgp,
>> return status;
>> }
>>
>> - status = request_irq(gpio_to_irq(gpio_nr),
>> ti_bandgap_tshut_irq_handler,
>> - IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, "tshut", NULL);
>> + status = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, gpio_to_irq(gpio_nr),
>> + ti_bandgap_tshut_irq_handler,
>> + IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, "tshut", NULL);
>> if (status) {
>> - gpio_free(gpio_nr);
>> dev_err(bgp->dev, "request irq failed for TSHUT");
>> + return status;
>> }
>>
>> return 0;
>
>
> Remove two more lines:
>
> if (status)
> dev_err(bgp->dev, "request irq failed for TSHUT");
>
> return status;
Thanks fore comment. Will do this here. Same can be done in another
function which requests one more irq.
>
>
>> @@ -1104,7 +1105,7 @@ static int ti_bandgap_talert_init(struct ti_bandgap
>> *bgp,
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "get_irq failed\n");
>> return bgp->irq;
>> }
>> - ret = request_threaded_irq(bgp->irq, NULL,
>> + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, bgp->irq, NULL,
>> ti_bandgap_talert_irq_handler,
>> IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH | IRQF_ONESHOT,
>> "talert", bgp);
>> @@ -1212,21 +1213,17 @@ int ti_bandgap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - bgp->fclock = clk_get(NULL, bgp->conf->fclock_name);
>> - ret = IS_ERR(bgp->fclock);
>> - if (ret) {
>> + bgp->fclock = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL,
>> bgp->conf->fclock_name);
>> + if (IS_ERR(bgp->fclock)) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request fclock
>> reference\n");
>> - ret = PTR_ERR(bgp->fclock);
>> - goto free_irqs;
>> + return PTR_ERR(bgp->fclock);
>> }
>>
>> - bgp->div_clk = clk_get(NULL, bgp->conf->div_ck_name);
>> - ret = IS_ERR(bgp->div_clk);
>> - if (ret) {
>> + bgp->div_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL,
>> bgp->conf->div_ck_name);
>> + if (IS_ERR(bgp->div_clk)) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>> "failed to request div_ts_ck clock ref\n");
>> - ret = PTR_ERR(bgp->div_clk);
>> - goto free_irqs;
>> + return PTR_ERR(bgp->div_clk);
>> }
>>
>> for (i = 0; i< bgp->conf->sensor_count; i++) {
>> @@ -1251,7 +1248,6 @@ int ti_bandgap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> clk_rate<= 0) {
>> ret = -ENODEV;
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "wrong clock rate (%d)\n", clk_rate);
>> - goto put_clks;
>> }
>>
>> ret = clk_set_rate(bgp->div_clk, clk_rate);
>
>
> Fallback, rewriting ret value and attempting to set wrong clk_rate?
>
My wrong. will return -ENODEV in error case in v3.
>
>> @@ -1357,14 +1353,6 @@ remove_sensors:
>> disable_clk:
>> if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS(bgp, CLK_CTRL))
>> clk_disable_unprepare(bgp->fclock);
>> -put_clks:
>> - clk_put(bgp->fclock);
>> - clk_put(bgp->div_clk);
>> -free_irqs:
>> - if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS(bgp, TSHUT)) {
>> - free_irq(gpio_to_irq(bgp->tshut_gpio), NULL);
>> - gpio_free(bgp->tshut_gpio);
>> - }
>>
>> return ret;
>> }
>> @@ -1388,16 +1376,6 @@ int ti_bandgap_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS(bgp, CLK_CTRL))
>> clk_disable_unprepare(bgp->fclock);
>> - clk_put(bgp->fclock);
>> - clk_put(bgp->div_clk);
>> -
>> - if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS(bgp, TALERT))
>> - free_irq(bgp->irq, bgp);
>> -
>> - if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS(bgp, TSHUT)) {
>> - free_irq(gpio_to_irq(bgp->tshut_gpio), NULL);
>> - gpio_free(bgp->tshut_gpio);
>> - }
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Thanks and Regards
Pramod